HUNTER BIDEN exposed
- Thread starter hedo rick
- Start date
No. Why would it be relevant?
Is Joe going to hire him to run things in the white house?
Hunter is a reflection of his family. In other words he is a reflection of Joe. People have to suspect he's a perv too. Do you really think a family like that would put their country's interest first? Wouldn't they be more susceptible to the influence of China? Isn't it embarrassing to have a family of pervs ruling the country? I think most people would say yes. What happened to those Me Too women?
You continue to believe this is a legit story despite a lack of credible evidence.The only reason China makes deals with Hunter is because of his father. There is no other reason, so the two are linked. Hunter is in a unique position to sell out his country. Hunter often mentions in the leaks that Joe gets a percentage of the profits, so both are selling out.
Guiliani on the bidens
Mayor Guiliani talks hunter biden: "A bag man for his dad..."www.bitchute.com
Joe Biden has denied it. Hunter Biden is not running for office.
Lol...but of course...it's easy to look the other way if you're dead set on "just not Trump"...
Trying for a little reality, nobody is going to vote for Hunter Biden any more than they will; vote for any of the Donald's brood...
How are they going to blackmail him now that the dark web is flooded with his deepfakes and 'emails'?
Seems that if you were going to blackmail someone you'd say publicly there is something like a 'piss tape' and then keep threatening to release it for more money or influence for your country.
No one is saying all the evidence is in. There's just a rational basis for a formal investigation.
As to "belief" (which is actually the appropriate term to use, pending formal investigation) can you think of a rational reason for a Chinese or Ukrainian company to put Hunter Biden on their board or to do business with Hunter Biden other than to engage the influence of Joe Biden? I can't. If you can't either, maybe you should be putting the burden on Joe and Hunter to explain themselves, or suffer the consequences of the court of public opinion. Voters always have to make decisions based on imperfect information.
Hunter Biden has a law degree from Yale and is partner in an investment and advisory firm, more qualified than Kushner and Ivanka have as Senior White House Advisors.
We already know this. It has been investigated already and revealed no evidence of wrongdoing. The fact that Rudy Colludey shows up with a copy of a hard drive obtained from Russian Intelligence Officers 2 weeks before the election looks exactly like what it is.
Sorry, but Hunter Biden was in no way qualified to sit on the board of a Ukrainian energy firm. (Not to mention his struggles with drug addiction, etc.).
Because Kushner and Ivanka's roles are political, there are no definitive qualifications for their jobs.
p.s. A law degree does not equip you for a career in investment advice in the least!
Last edited:
Sorry, but it's never been "investigated". As far as anyone knows, the FBI are currently still following through on their investigation arising from Hunter's laptop. They certainly haven't announced that that they closed their investigation.
Your observation about timing and political opportunism is fair, but is in no way helpful to determining the truth of the allegations. These kind allegations aren't comparable to sexual harassment allegations that aren't pursued for decades, as the inference in sexual misconduct cases is that something so personal would be pursued more promptly. Instead, what is being alleged here is the type of behaviour that is typically covered up and can take a long time to unearth ( especially while the Democrats were in power).
LOL. And you know he was not qualified how? I do not doubt that his last name helped but how do you know apart from that he was not qualified. Are junior and Eric qualified to run the greatest real estate empire in the history of the world? I guess the interview process was quite grueling. How about Rudy's son's job at the WH. I could go on but you get my drift.
Your selective outrage is really quite funny and transparent.
Maybe the Biden name did help but he I wouldn't be surprised if he was more qualified to sit on the energy board than some of the Ukraine people were...he was a graduate from Yale law school, that's not too bad...
As far as your comment of 'struggles with drug addiction' he has come out about that, and if we had to examine the 535 members of congress and their families I'm sure there would be some pretty ugly stories involved...maybe even in the Trump family.
Biden had a law degree (which means very little to a role on a energy company board), had been discharged from military service over drug abuse, and didn't have a job prior to his appointment to the Bourisma board. He had no management experience in the energy industry, no specialized knowledge related to doing business in the Ukraine (I don't think he even spoke the language), and no experience shepherding a company through corruption investigations. In short, whatever corporate career he had, and as irrelevant as it was, was washed up.
You tell me how he was qualified. It must be a well kept secret, because Joe Biden's campaign hasn't let anyone know! LOL!
As a member of a number of boards presently and in the past I can tell you that a member need not have experience in the particular industry. He was a corporate lawyer I obviously do not know him but generally speaking that may well give him the skill set required. I do not doubt that his last name was an important and perhaps critical and maybe the only reason he was hired. I do not know but even if that is the case I am missing what you see as a problem or how he is different than anyone else with a famous and perhaps powerful parent. What does that have to do with Joe other than to divert from your fearless leaders ineptitude.
That is of course a rhetorical question although i can hardly wait for your no doubt silly answer.
