Pickering Angels

Huckabee, Palin top list of 2012 GOP contenders, poll says

jwmorrice

Gentleman by Profession
Jun 30, 2003
7,133
1
0
In the laboratory.
Huckabee, Palin top list of 2012 GOP contenders, poll says

* Story Highlights
* Poll: 34 percent of Republicans, those leaning to GOP likely to back Mike Huckabee
* Sarah Palin gets backing of 32 percent, within poll's margin of error
* Ex-Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney places third in poll
* Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is just behind Romney

By Paul Steinhauser
CNN Deputy Political Director

WASHINGTON (CNN) --
Are you ready yet?

Barack Obama is more than six weeks away from assuming the presidency, and the next Iowa caucuses are more than three years away, but a national poll out Friday suggests that former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin top the list of potential 2012 Republican presidential hopefuls.

Huckabee leads in the CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll released Friday. The survey is an early measure of possible support for the next GOP presidential nomination.

Thirty-four percent of Republicans and independents who lean toward the GOP said they are very likely to support the former Arkansas governor as the Republican nominee in 2012.

Huckabee surprised many by winning this year's Republican Iowa caucuses and seven other contests before dropping out of the race in March and backing Sen. John McCain.

Palin, McCain's running mate, is 2 percentage points behind Huckabee, at 32 percent. Considering the survey's sampling error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points, Palin and Huckabee are basically tied.

"It might come as a surprise to some that Palin does better than Huckabee among GOP men, but that Huckabee beats Palin among Republican women. Palin's strength is also concentrated among older Republicans, but Huckabee may have a slight edge among conservative Republicans," said Keating Holland, CNN's polling director.

Among voters who consider themselves born again or evangelicals, Huckabee holds a 9-percentage point lead over Palin, with the Alaska governor ahead by 7 points among those not in that group.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney is in third place in the poll, with 28 percent of those questioned saying they are very likely to support him as the GOP nominee in 2012. Romney gave up his bid for the White House in February and backed McCain.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is 1 percentage point behind Romney, at 27 percent. In 2007, Gingrich flirted with making a stab at the Republican nomination but decided against jumping into the race.

Twenty-three percent said they would be very likely to support former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani if he decides to run again. Giuliani was the front-runner in many polls in late 2007 before performing poorly in the early primaries and caucuses. He dropped out of the race for the White House in January and immediately backed McCain.

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, who's considered a rising star in the GOP, grabs the backing of 19 percent, with Florida Gov. Charlie Crist at 7 percent.

"Jindal and Crist are relative unknowns. The fact that they get much less support than the others is likely a function of name recognition rather than a true measure of their potential base of support," Holland said.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
50,413
9,409
113
Toronto
Four years is an eternity.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
shack said:
Four years is an eternity.
jwmorrice said:
"Jindal and Crist are relative unknowns. The fact that they get much less support than the others is likely a function of name recognition rather than a true measure of their potential base of support,"
It’s way, way too early to make any sort of predictions about the 2012 Primaries.
 

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
19,071
5,443
113
Lewiston, NY
Especially ...

shack said:
Four years is an eternity.
When the whole friggin 4 years is talking about the next election! That is a real losers lineup for the Republicans, though. Four long years may not be enough for them to get their shit together!:D
 
O

OnTheWayOut

newguy27 said:
oh please. it's too far away. Wasn't Edwards the saviour after Kerry lost?
Exactly. 4 years ago who had heard of Obama? These polls and speculation are worthless. I'm gonna go jerk off to Sarah now ........:p
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,490
11
38
They're looking for who to throw to the wolves. Remember Kim Campbell.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
DonQuixote said:
If its those two I totally agree.
Four years is an eternity in politics. On September 20, 2001 would you have predicted the President's current approval ratings?*



*And yes I can count but the point's the same.
 

skypilot

Rebistrad Suer
Jan 10, 2003
2,249
0
0
Over home
shakenbake said:
That is exactly what is wrong with the GOP today. They are so blind to see that they MUST separate the church from the state if they are to get anywhere, today.
Absolutely right. The GOP has turned into a regional party based on fundamental christianity.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
50,413
9,409
113
Toronto
skypilot said:
Absolutely right. The GOP has turned into a regional party based on fundamental christianity.
Because that's what's helped get them elected. When they discover that won't work indefinitely they will amazingly (NOT) abandon some of those so called principles to regain power. It's always, always, always about power and whatever it takes to get it and retain it.
 

Mongrel4u

Guest
May 27, 2005
3,427
3
0
shakenbake said:
That is exactly what is wrong with the GOP today. They are so blind to see that they MUST separate the church from the state if they are to get anywhere, today.
The church has no place in politics and running a country whatsoever
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
Mongrel4u said:
The church has no place in politics and running a country whatsoever
It entirely depends on what you mean by the term "the church" do you mean a particular denomination or faith; or that religion has no place in politics. If the later, that is one of the things that has cost the Democratic Party dearly over the past forty plus years. Since the vast majority of the U.S. electorate disagrees with you.
 

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
19,071
5,443
113
Lewiston, NY
But, But ....

shakenbake said:
That is exactly what is wrong with the GOP today. They are so blind to see that they MUST separate the church from the state if they are to get anywhere, today.
Jesus wouldn't let them!:rolleyes:
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Tad early don't you think......

OTB
 
Mar 19, 2006
8,767
0
0
Aardvark154 said:
Four years is an eternity in politics. On September 20, 2001 would you have predicted the President's current approval ratings?*
On September 20th I would have.

If I recall his numbers were not so good before Sep 11. If not for the attacks, I believe Bush would have been a 1 term lame duck, just like daddy.
 

Cobster

New member
Apr 29, 2002
10,422
0
0
Palin is a moron. Once she opened her mouth, her poll numbers started to reflect what an idiot she was since people didn't hold her in high regard.

She cheated on her hubby (twice), cokehead son over which she has no control over (sends him off to Iraq), pregnant teen daugher (so much for family values) and a pregnancy cover-up.


PLEASE.
 

train

New member
Jul 29, 2002
6,992
0
0
Above 7
shakenbake said:
That is exactly what is wrong with the GOP today. They are so blind to see that they MUST separate the church from the state if they are to get anywhere, today.
Totally agree - the religious bumpkin vote as represented by Huckleberry Hound and Palin is bringing them down.
 
Toronto Escorts