This is a oft-repeated and erroneous argument against Trump that largely ignores recent history. Trump fairs no worse than recent Republican candidates with minority voters. Some would say he's improved the Republican vote at the margins enough to win in 2016 and possibly 2020.
If you think the Republican party is anti-minority, that's fine. I don't want to have that debate on this thread.
You Americans and your race-thingy. 'Minority' was a politico-parliamentary term long before you started using it to refer to population groups you wished you didn't have to deal with.
Even if he were to win again in 2020, I'm confident that it would only by through be a repeat of 2016's undemocratic farce, when votes of 304 party hacks out-weighed the votes of a the majority of 67 million American citizens. Trump managed only a minority of the vote.
Ever since, Trump's minority have devoutly wished they didn't have to deal with the majority, so they vilify, abuse and disadvantage them at every opportunity. And just as with the racial version of majority/minority, they and the country would fare much better if they'd focus on what they have in common and find ways to prosper together. Little progress so far — politically or racially.
Those who don't learn …