Hot or not?

Which would you prefer?

  • Not great looking but great lover

    Votes: 62 66.7%
  • Great looking but not great lover

    Votes: 31 33.3%

  • Total voters
    93
Angela@Mirage said:
Great response! If a person has a bad attitude or thinks they are God, the sex sucks.
Totally agree with you there Angela... the type of person of whom I am referring to would be one that has a willingness to learn... should also be willing to experiment and have few inhibitions... maybe just inexperienced would be a better term.
 
I'll definitely take someone that is average looking but a good lover.

A good lover doesn't even mean they already have to have the skills but rather I define a good lover as someone that is open minded and willing to discover sex and our bodies alongside me. I've had my share of people that are close minded and only like sex one way and no matter how good looking they are I'm not going to be sexually fulfilled.
 

a 1 player

Smells like manly roses.
Feb 24, 2004
9,728
8
0
on your girlfriend
Myself, I would rather take someone who is physically unattractive, but who has the whole package except for looks. I need to be stimulated mentally to be stimulated sexually, (for anything longer than a one night stand).
 
a 1 player said:
Myself, I would rather take someone who is physically unattractive, but who has the whole package except for looks. I need to be stimulated mentally to be stimulated sexually, (for anything longer than a one night stand).
So... a butter face, w/ excellent, experimental, uninhibited, insatiable, nympho type attitude?:D
 

a 1 player

Smells like manly roses.
Feb 24, 2004
9,728
8
0
on your girlfriend
Cycleguy007 said:
So... a butter face, w/ excellent, experimental, uninhibited, insatiable, nympho type attitude?:D
If she has a great attitude, is intelligent, fun to be with, a sense of humor, and not too much emotional baggage I would date her in a heartbeat.
 

to-guy69

New member
Mar 28, 2004
1,469
0
0
Sonic Temple
Depends on how you define "not great looking" (i.e. below average? average? above average?) because you may not get to experience how great a lover she is depending on your standards. Looks also become much more subjective in that middle range as oppose to either extreme (i.e. Ophra Winfrey isn't beautiful and Cindy Crawford isn't ugly).
 

RTRD

Registered User
Sep 26, 2003
6,004
3
0
Let me go on record....

Kyra_to said:
I'll definitely take someone that is average looking but a good lover.

A good lover doesn't even mean they already have to have the skills but rather I define a good lover as someone that is open minded and willing to discover sex and our bodies alongside me. I've had my share of people that are close minded and only like sex one way and no matter how good looking they are I'm not going to be sexually fulfilled.

...that I am REALLY average looking, and REALLY prepared to be open minded when dealing with you sexually. I might even let you bring your strap on toy. You just can't tell Gen that I did. :p
 
MLAM said:
...that I am REALLY average looking, and REALLY prepared to be open minded when dealing with you sexually. I might even let you bring your strap on toy. You just can't tell Gen that I did.
Sweet talker! ;)

What if I wanted to invite Gen along?
 

RTRD

Registered User
Sep 26, 2003
6,004
3
0
She is only going to get angry....

Kyra_to said:
Sweet talker!

What if I wanted to invite Gen along?
...that I let you peg me first...so, we'd better leave her out of it. :p
 

hickorysticks

New member
Nov 1, 2008
68
0
0
a 1 player said:
Myself, I would rather take someone who is physically unattractive, but who has the whole package except for looks. I need to be stimulated mentally to be stimulated sexually, (for anything longer than a one night stand).
Dido

Plus beauty is in the eye of the beholder...
 
Toronto Escorts