You may like a good debate, but your history needs some brushing up.I too love a good debate.
Firstly we do hear lots about other genocides, the US Congress is still debating whether or not to condemn the prior events in Turkey. We also still hear plenty about Rwanda and in fact Native Americans. It is a myth we don't hear about other genocides. IT all depends on your focus, had lunch with a guy from Estonia yesterday and had a long talk about the genocide against the Kulaks in Russia.The prime reason we do not hear about other genocides, is beacue people have gotten over them. No one holds anyone hostage, and makes the current generation feel guilty consistently as the Jews do to the Germans. The holocaust has become a central focus of Jewish ethnic groups. Which is strange, as Jews have been exiled, and perscucated since antiquity. See list: http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/expelled.htm
You also clearly don't know much about Judiasm. Their previous persecutions and troubles, including the captivity in Egypt, the destruction of the temple, the war with the Romans and the diaspora are central to their identity and how they think about themselves and their religion. You just arn't well informed enough to understand that. Don't mistake your own ignorance for someone else's.
Because the Nazi attempts to exterminate large groups of people were a) very well documented after WWII and b) we were involved in the war to bring that empire to an end. You can see a similar heightened interest in say Rwanda because of our involvement there.Thus why solely focus on Germans?
This is a terrible analogy. Despite what 19th century German nationalist historians will tell you, the Romans had no interest in settling in Germany and never really occupied it. And to compare the migration of the tribes in classical times, (Goths, Ostragoths, Lombards, Vandals, Franks etc) to the attempted extermination of a segment of your own population and foreign population is just daft. You also fail to take into account that many of the Jews killed had families settled in Germany for hundreds of years. And I don't know what you mean by failure to assimilate. Many of the Jews killed in the holocaust were decorated veterans of WWI who had sacrificed and suffered for Germany in the trenches. If by "assimilate" you mean "did not abandon their religion" you would be right. But they spoke the language, dressed the same, paid taxes, worked in the same jobs, taught at universities, made popular movies, were important musicians...what more do you suggest they should have done to assimilate?Secondly Germanic tribes also got rid of the Roman invaders, like Spain got rid of the Moors. Did the Germans of old not have a claim to the land of their ancestors? To expell people of a foreign culture, who refused to assimilate, and had amassed much of the wealth? Keep the land and its wealth for their own offspring? Keep in mind there was no political correctness in pre WW2 Germany.
People who misuse evolutionary theory in this fashion are the kind of folks who give science a bad name. It also shows an ignorance of basic evolutionary science and misunderstanding of Darwin. If you like we can go down that road.To say otherwise is contradictory to evolutionary theory. Ethnic groups compete for resources, and that has been the prime cause of many genocides.
So you are suggesting there is nothing to condemn in the Holocaust. I think you need a moral overhaul.Currently Jews are quite keen on keeping Israel a Jewish state, with Jewish customs, and represent Jewish interests. Why should others be condemned for doing the same?
I think you got it backwards. Do you mean Germans killing Jews?I disagree with the fact that Jewish organizations consistantly remind us of the holoucaust to teach "tolerance", as much as to convince others of their moral bankrupcy. Creating movies which feature Jews killing Germans does not help people become more tolerent; it inflames others. Demanding reperations from the current generations hard work also does not help.
Making movies that show that is called history. I guess you think we should not face up to our real history because it is too painful for you. So much for history. And you have a problem with the group that committed a crime paying compensation to the victims? I guess we should just give them a pass.
Wrong again. Not only does evolutionary theory not work that way, Jews were not a threat to the survival of the German people. The key factual underpinning of your assertion does not exist.Again not to condone Hitler, or the Nazi's. What happened in Germany was an expression of the very human instinct to favor one's ethnic group, to ensure the survival of the group.





