Now you are making up claims in order to continue your denial of the validity of the paper.
Nope, just questioning how 99.94% was arrived at & appears the author may have had his pencil on the scale
Its idiotic that you think you would need to judge the scientific validity of a theory by a person opinion poll, rather then assessing the peer assessed and published scientific research into a subject.
your position is 99.94 % of scientist agree with the position that the climate is changing, due to CO2 levels and caused by human actions, specifically the burning of fossil fuels
It turns out (according to post 201) that many of those papers did not explicitly investigate all of those multiple issues
So something is gone off the track. 99.94% ????? i knew that was far too precise & far too close to 100% to be correct
Those scientists may have been mis-represented
You are not neutral, you are denying the validity of all the research presented here based on your personal feelings.
I have not denied anything.
I am questioning certain aspects such as extrapolation to 800,000 years past and extrapolation into the future & the use of carbon dating well in excess of its usable range.
I am questioning the accuracy/ precision of 99.94%
I am questioning scientific consensus being substituted for scientific methodology
I am questioning how a scientific illiterate moron can state his position is absolute when clearly his understanding of science is below a grade 10 level
I am also questioning when I see false authority abused
However I have never stated the scientist are right, nor have I stated they are wrong
As stated many time before I am neutral
You do not acknowledge my right to not agree with you and by default you do not acknowledge my right to dis-agree with you
That would make your position absolute & that is not possible with predictive science
I can not be a denier if I am neutral
You have been caught mis-representing yourself and others , that makes you a liar
You have also been shown to not understand very simple grade 10 level scientific principals, that makes you a moron
Now why should anyone believe a liar and a moron ?