Here's One Global Warming Study Nobody Wants You To See

[JohnLarue]

[I don't have an agenda, that's you projecting

.
Somehow I do not believe you
Perhaps it something to do with your constant bullshitting

The IPCC working papers represent a good summary of the science now, you really should check them out.

It seems most of the links you provide have some odor attached to them
If a scientific consensus is being touted as the final word, then they are definaty questionable

Because when you are looking at the 'greatest crime/sin in history' and you're too lazy to do enough research to see if its true,

Too lazy??
WTF
I was able to determine it looks like Carbon 14 dating has been used well beyond its useful limitations.

You have a lot of nerve of accusing anyone of anything wrt science when it is clear you do not understand the subject matter
You are an idiot & without morals

yet spend endless pages here on personal attacks it really makes your own agenda apparent.

My agenda?
I am only interested in the truth & want to ensure nobody is mislead (by a lying idiot)

If you spent as much time in one day posting here in basic research, you'd be much better informed.

Too funny
Says the scientific moron
Hows that gasoline calculation coming?
Still having trouble with weighted averages?
still think there are special isotopes specifically for climate studies ?

How can you be so uninformed about science beyond the grade 10 level & still have the guts to question what someone else knows?
What an idiot

Look stupid, I cold forget 90% of what I know & still be far more informed than you
You do not understand what you preach about

 

[Frankfooter]

.
It seems most of the links you provide have some odor attached to them
If a scientific consensus is being touted as the final word, then they are definaty questionable

The IPCC reports are never 'the final word', same with the latest papers on consensus.
For instance, you really should read the executive summary of the latest IPCC report on climate change.
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/AR5_SYR_FINAL_SPM.pdf

That report synthesizes the findings of thousands of scientists from over 100 countries into one executive report, with numbers, confidence levels of findings and links to to the original works with all the data.
Those reports take years of work and are updated every 5 or so years.

Details of the organization and reports are here.
http://www.ipcc.ch/

 

[JohnLarue]

The IPCC reports are never 'the final word', same with the latest papers on consensus.

then you stop promoting them as such & instead learn about what you preach

For instance, you really should read the executive summary of the latest IPCC report on climate change.
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/AR5_SYR_FINAL_SPM.pdf

For someone who does not understand what a half life is , yet quotes carbon dating as if it as infallible as gravity, you should not be telling anyone what they should really read.
You have years of reading to do before you will be in a position to understand what you promote with absolute certainty
You have years of learning after that before you will be a position to tell others what they should read.

And I have yet to mention how your links invariably have a biased baked in.
You have noone but yourself to blame for your lack of credibility

That report synthesizes the findings of thousands of scientists from over 100 countries into one executive report, with numbers, confidence levels of findings and links to to the original works with all the data.
Those reports take years of work and are updated every 5 or so years.

And they wind up with 99.94% ?
Again I am skeptical

Details of the organization and reports are here.
http://www.ipcc.ch/

Yawn