It's not analagous to civilian murder. Any person can murdered in the civilian context.It's the crime of murder, literally, or attempted murder if you fail to kill anyone. Your notion that you cannot be charged because the person you were shooting at wasn't where you thought they were, or who you thought they were, is just plain wrong.
Oh, I see now, this is why you keep coming back to this definition. Because according to you, and your twisted little mind, you can therefore almost never prove that someone didn't think anyone was a civilian. By this definition, anyone can kill anyone in war and just say 'I thought they were not civilian' and then be absolved of murder. Regardless of what they based their belief on, as long as they think someone's not a civilian they therefore can kill them and thus, being a civilian is a moot point. So Israel can kill civilian police in their police stations (sorry to go back here blackrock) and Hamas can kill pregnant settlers as long as they all thought for some reason that their targets were not civilians.To prove something like that you'd likely need the attacker to confess to it, pretty hard to prove, so what we are talking about is largely academic--unless the attackers actually steps up and says, "Gee I really thought they were Palestinian civilians and I was intent on killing a few of those."
Well I am sure the ZOG has you on their list now...To my personal beliefs, there is still some anti-semitism in this world and it is well deserved. Read some background info on these billboards in the predominantly Jewish areas. The all of these funds / charities are tax free and a lot of them goes into military spending. Don't even get me into the US spending 3 billion dollars of their own money to buy new fighter jets for Israel. Israel's exemption from the NPT, despite having a nuclear weapons. Now they are claiming bloody murder on the Iranian's for seeking the technology as well. In my personal opinion, they are just as bad as the Nazi's, to what they are doing to the Palestinian people. They haven't learned shit.... now they are in a position of power, exerting it over another body with substantially less resources than they have. Many of the people killed by the IDF, should be considered war-crimes, as the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan.
Before you even bring up anything about the Holocaust.... look at Jews today and their influence and power on the modern world/economy. I find the holocaust is used as "an excuse" to prove there is anti-semitism in this world. The Holocaust happened 70 years ago, we know there is still significant amount of anti-semitism in this world, but it does not stem from the holocaust, but modern day activities from their primary state Israel. How about we talk about anti-muslim/islamic/middle eastern discrimination? By far, today that is far more of a cause of concern in the modern day world.
Correct. It is not analagous to murder. It is murder. That's why, say, Robert Semrau was charged with murder and not with some arcane war crime. War crimes tribunals come into play only when nations refuse to investigate their own transgressions. Generally it's left to the ordinary national courts, as in the Semrau case. In fact it's a violation of the ICC charter, for example, for the ICC to get involved in a case that has been competently handled by the local court system.It's not analagous to civilian murder.
You fail at reading, and comprehension, you have no idea what you are talking about, and you should probably just give up on life.Oh, I see now, this is why you keep coming back to this definition. Because according to you, and your twisted little mind, you can therefore almost never prove that someone didn't think anyone was a civilian.
You just keep making shit up. Are you delusional. Where did I say anything about which courts had jurisdiction over the offense.Correct. It is not analagous to murder. It is murder. That's why, say, Robert Semrau was charged with murder and not with some arcane war crime. War crimes tribunals come into play only when nations refuse to investigate their own transgressions. Generally it's left to the ordinary national courts, as in the Semrau case. In fact it's a violation of the ICC charter, for example, for the ICC to get involved in a case that has been competently handled by the local court system.
Of course if you were a real lawyer you would have known that.
Correct. You can in fact attempt murder against someone who isn't there, or more accurately, isn't who you thought they were.By your logic a crime can be committed against a class of people who arn't even there!
Me too. Something along the lines of, "Gee I was wrong, but I made a bit shit out of myself, and now I can't figure out how to get out of it gracefully". It has happened to rld on a few threads now--go ahead, ask him about the Haddiths of Aisha.I sense as migraine coming on for Rid.
Nice statement. You think that some people hate the Jews but it's their own fault.To my personal beliefs, there is still some anti-semitism in this world and it is well deserved...
Not what I meant at all. You've shown one more time you read something that's not there at all, but we're use to that.Me too. Something along the lines of, "Gee I was wrong, but I made a bit shit out of myself, and now I can't figure out how to get out of it gracefully". It has happened to rld on a few threads now--go ahead, ask him about the Haddiths of Aisha.
You plainly can be charged with attempted murder for trying to kill someone who isn't there, if you make a positive act towards killing them, in the full belief that they are there, and that your act will result in their death.
Both sides are SCUM. And Israel is now engaged in it's own holocaust.and your point is?
That's ok your posts are usually devoid of any real content. I'd say 1 in 20 max you've actually got something to say.Not what I meant at all. You've shown one more time you read something that's not there at all, but we're use to that.
No Migrane. No analogies. Just a clear recognition that since Fuji was just going to spout his unsubstantiated opinions with nothing but hot air to back them up, I was actually going to have to take a text off the shelf and argue from authority:Me too. Something along the lines of, "Gee I was wrong, but I made a bit shit out of myself, and now I can't figure out how to get out of it gracefully". It has happened to rld on a few threads now--go ahead, ask him about the Haddiths of Aisha.
You plainly can be charged with attempted murder for trying to kill someone who isn't there, if you make a positive act towards killing them, in the full belief that they are there, and that your act will result in their death.
Coming from a time honoured practitioner of oil slick vacuous posts, there's not much weight behind your critiques.That's ok your posts are usually devoid of any real content. I'd say 1 in 20 max you've actually got something to say.
