Neverenuff$ said:
...Geez The Liberals had 12 years to "Give us something" .. I guess giving it to us up the Ass reduced methane emissions anyway ...
Don't forget the current Lieberal Leacher Dion was Enironment minister for 17 months ... he didn't even have a clean air plan , just Toss the word Koyoto around and diss the Americans...
before that he was unity minister so he couldn't have known about adscam either...
now of course the Liberals tell us that the Environment is our number one concern and only "they" can fix it .. Like Canadian Unity and Health and .....
all the other near disasters they fixed..
oooops almost ranted there
The Libs held power for 12 years but remember the responsibility for the environment is predominantly within provincial jurisdiction. So on the subject of global warming, why aren't you blaming Conservative premier Ralph Klein? He was the (shudder) environment minister in Don Getty's government before becoming the premier in 1992. So he had previous environmental experience, even more time than the federal Liberals did and emissions were within his provincial jurisdiction. So it was HIS fucking job to curb emissions but he, like most of those Alberta conservatives, just hid his head in the sand and hoped it would all go away. Just like Stockwell and Rona and Harper.
Meanwhile, Dion was Environment Minister for 17 months, starting in July 2004. That isn't very long but he DID get a few things done:
http://www.liberal.ca/members_e.aspx?id=2369
"Among his accomplishments as Environment Minister, Mr. Dion won international agreement to extend the Kyoto protocol beyond 2012 at the follow-up to the Kyoto Conference on Climate Change in Montreal in December 2005. This followed his announcement, in April 2005, of Project Green – an updated climate change plan to honour its Kyoto commitments. In June 2005, Mr. Dion also announced $9.2 million in funding to help protect species at risk and their habitat."
This is part of the CBC Kyoto timeline. I've shown only the events that occurred during Dion's tenure as environment minister:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/kyoto/timeline.html
[2004]
Sept. 30: Russia approves Kyoto and later formally ratifies it, giving the protocol enough support for it to go into force in February 2005.
December: Canada finally abandons attempt to win emission credits for exporting clean natural gas and hydroelectric power to the U.S.
2005
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
January: Several media organizations say Ottawa is about to announce a revamp of its 2002 Kyoto implementation plan.
Feb. 16: Kyoto Protocol formally goes into force. Canada still has not released details of how it will achieve its Kyoto commitments.
March 23: The federal government and Canada's car makers reach an agreement on emissions standards. Automakers agree that its new vehicles will cut emissions by 5.3 megatonnes by 2010 as part of Ottawa's Kyoto plan.
April 6: The minority Liberal government offers to pull a controversial provision dealing with the Kyoto accord from its budget bill. The opposition Conservatives, NDP and Bloc Québécois have all said they would vote against the budget because of the provision, which would make greenhouse gas emissions a controlled substance so Ottawa could regulate them. In order to appease the opposition, Liberal House leader Tony Valeri offers a deal to Conservative House leader Jay Hill that will allow the finance committee to reject the proposal.
April 13: The federal government announces details of its Kyoto implementation plan, which revamps the plan it put in place almost three years earlier. The government pledges $10 billion to cut greenhouse gases by 270 megatonnes a year by 2008-2012. The plan relaxes emission targets for large industrial polluters.
April 14: Environmentalists say parts of Ottawa's new plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions will be good for the Atlantic region. The Atlantic chapter of the Sierra Club of Canada says promoting the use of alternative energy sources is ideal because Atlantic Canada has a high wind potential. But they're disappointed with the targets set for large polluters. Large companies create almost half of the country's emissions, but they are only required to reduce them by about 14 per cent.
A Yukon environmental group says federal plans fall far short of what's needed. The Yukon Conservation Society says the government is only promising to consult with large firms that produce about 50 per cent of Canada's greenhouse gas emissions, rather than force them to cut their CO2 production.
Nov. 3: Alberta files a formal objection to the federal government's plans to implement the Kyoto accord and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Alberta has long opposed the Kyoto accord, saying it will hurt the province's lucrative oil and gas industry. Provincial Environment Minister Guy Boutilier says Alberta should be allowed to put its own legislation in place to regulate greenhouse gas emissions."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephane_Dion
..."Canada's poor Kyoto implementation record did not prevent Dion from earning high praise for his work chairing the U.N. Climate Change summit (COP 11/MOP 1) in Montreal in 2005. [36] Later, when Dion's record as environment minister was under scrutiny in the closing days of the Liberal leadership campaign, former Sierra Club of Canada director and current leader of the Green Party of Canada Elizabeth May came to his defence, calling him a "very very good environment minister."[37]
So would you like to reconsider your earlier statement: "Don't forget the current Lieberal Leacher Dion was Enironment minister for 17 months ... he didn't even have a clean air plan , just Toss the word Koyoto around and diss the Americans...".