Reasons enough to keep quiet.Pallydin said:Geez....and I thought *I* was supposed to be the paranoid one around here.
I don't think .............., I don't understand ................
PAL
How amusing.....you *do* realize that the proposed new formats for the Hamilton TERB party (based on privacy and discretion) is just what had been proposed in the first place but were shouted down as being outlandish and unnecessary precautions? If only some people had listened back then instead of having to learn the hard way.....well, things would still be a go for September 9th without a moment of interruption or confusion.Skids-kid said:Let's resurect the damn party and have a good time inspite of the efforts of some to .....................
Pallydin said:How amusing.....you *do* realize that the proposed new formats for the Hamilton TERB party (based on privacy and discretion) is just what had been proposed in the first place but were shouted down as being outlandish and unnecessary precautions? If only some people had listened back then instead of having to learn the hard way.....well, things would still be a go for September 9th without a moment of interruption or confusion.
I didn't want to have to say "We told you so" but since some people have decided to be asses about it:
We told you so.
Don't get pissy with some of us because we saw it months ago. Be pissy with those who blindly fell into the situation things are in now.
Oh, and since people have finally come around to doing things right for once, I'd be willing to help in any way as well.
PAL
You really do have the blinders on my friend.. The "proposed new formats" are not "(based on privacy and discrection)". They are, in fact , the way the guest list will be controlled. At one time everyone was welcome at a Hamilton Terb Party, sadly times have changed.Pallydin said:How amusing.....you *do* realize that the proposed new formats for the Hamilton TERB party (based on privacy and discretion) is just what had been proposed in the first place but were shouted down as being outlandish and unnecessary precautions? If only some people had listened back then instead of having to learn the hard way.....well, things would still be a go for September 9th without a moment of interruption or confusion.
I didn't want to have to say "We told you so" but since some people have decided to be asses about it:
We told you so.
Don't get pissy with some of us because we saw it months ago. Be pissy with those who blindly fell into the situation things are in now.
Oh, and since people have finally come around to doing things right for once, I'd be willing to help in any way as well.
PAL
All together, now:Trelew said:It's a party for crying out loud not a meeting of an organization to rule the world through SPs!
Since that big brick of obviousness that slammed into your head seems not to have fazed you in the least, I will point out that a guest list is the one way to ensure both privacy and discretion due to there being nobody allowed but those on the list. How exactly would a guest list be anything but that? And did you *seriously* not see that?Skids-kid said:You really do have the blinders on my friend.. The "proposed new formats" are not "(based on privacy and discrection)". They are, in fact , the way the guest list will be controlled.
Well, the "few days" Gentle Ben had requested to get things back on track *have* passed now, so I don't see what problem people could have with the Halloween party at this stage. I think people are mad the ball was dropped with a party that was supposed to be "rain or shine, flames or no flames,6 people or 60, the party is going to happen" and now some want to take it out on someone else instead of admitting they didn't consider everything (or even the obvious).Trelew said:Just out of curosity, it seems there are a couple that are reacting rather badly about the Halloween party. Last I checked the Sept 9th party seemed to have been cancelled and there was interest in having a party but not at a SC. So we manage to get one going at a bar for Halloween. What is the problem?
That's an easy one: people should be encouraged to sign up for the guest list as a "maybe" (and the guest list should be broken into "expected" and "maybe" for this very reason) and then it doesn't matter if they show up but they can if they find the time (while not skewing the numbers for expected guests). My concern would be for those who lurk without a handle to be used on a guest list or people brought by others from outside the online community (hobbyist or provider).secret_touch said:Having a "guest list" for security purposes sounds fine and dandy but what about people (hobbyists and providers) who only at last minute will know if they will make it or not?
Pallydin said:
Given the nature of the problem trying to be avoided, perhaps it would be better to arrange an exclusion list? Surely there is someone you could put near the door who can visually identify the rabble to have them left out?
PAL
Funny.....I don't ever recall either myself or Trelew leaving TERB. I personally found GTAC to be an amusing read and I saw some posts of Trelew's over there but I think you'll find most people on TERB did (although some refused to admit it).surehand said:But I've had enough of this Crap.....there is a reason why Pal and Trew left us to revel in the other board