Oh dear...
BiggieE said:
Most of my friends and family carry a gun when away from home....
None of them have ever had to use their guns....
Good thing they carry them then. If you've never used your gun, does that not (perhaps) mean that you don't need to carry it? After all, since it's concealed and only
you know it's there, it can't have done anything real to contribute to your safety...it's clearly all in your head.
I believe that if you live in an environment where you can't feel comfortable walking around without a gun, then there's something wrong with your environment. Introducing more potential for violence, by carrying a gun of your own, does nothing to solve the problem.
If the danger where you live (wherever that is) is so great that you feel you need a gun (but, then again, you've never used it so perhaps you are just paranoid) then you should focus your energy in changing your environment to make it a safer place.
My home is safe without guns and I can walk anywhere I want to go at any time of day or night without needing a gun to make me feel safe. This is the kind of home I want and if I ever felt unsafe being unarmed here, I'd do whatever it took to bring back the safety I enjoy today. What I would
not ever do, is escalate the situation by adding another gun (carried by me) to the mix.
A gun, especially a pistol or other sidearm, exists for the
sole and only purpose of inflicting serious injury or death to another person. It is not a case of a useful tool that can be dangerous if used incorrectly (like a car, hammer, or baseball bat); it is a case of a tool that is specifically designed to be an instrument of homicide. Everyone who carries a gun is adding one more weapon to an environment where weapons should not exist. Nothing about that is progressive, helpful, or appropriate.
It makes no difference whether you are trained in the use of the weapon or not; it is still a killing machine that has no place in civilised human society. Stupidly enough, many NRA members even object to a skills-based licensing requirement to carry a concealed weapon. Why, after all, should one be required to demonstrate that they can use a gun correctly before they are allowed to carry a lethal weapon in public? Maybe we should distribute "public" guns in phone-booth and other easily accessible locations. That way, people are saved the hassle of dealing with that unsightly bulge in their jacket and could just pick up a public gun whenever they needed one...you could even rig these devices to require that a quarter be deposited for every bullet fired.
I know many Americans who favour serious gun control. It is clearly only a segment of American society that has gone off the deep-end with regard to this issue. Still America suffers more gun-related injuries per-capita than any country in the world that is not an active war-zone. Simultaneously, our friends to the south have some of the most rediculously lenient gun laws inthe world...coincidence? Sure!
Zog.