Toronto Escorts

GOP Rep. Louie Gohmert publicly identifies person purported to be whistleblower

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
GOP Rep. Louie Gohmert publicly identifies person purported to be whistleblower

"This is unacceptable and there should be consequences," said one Democratic lawmaker.

By KYLE CHENEY and JOHN BRESNAHAN

12/11/2019 09:58 PM EST

Updated: 12/11/2019 10:55 PM EST

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) on Wednesday night publicly named a person that some Republicans and allies of President Donald Trump claim is the alleged whistleblower who first brought the Trump-Ukraine scandal to light.

Gohmert identified the person, who POLITICO is not naming, during remarks at a Judiciary Committee meeting on articles of impeachment against Trump. Gohmert named the person as he ticked through a list of witnesses he said the committee should hear from before voting on impeachment.

Gohmert did not identify the person as the potential whistleblower, but Republicans have demanded that the whistleblower be subpoenaed to testify, a call that Democrats have swatted away as irresponsible and even dangerous.

Democrats say any effort to identify the whistleblower could endanger the person's life and chill future whistleblowers from revealing alleged wrongdoing in government.

Asked by POLITICO about his decision to mention the name of the purported whistleblower, Gohmert said he was simply "naming witnesses to the case."

"I could care less who the whistleblower is," Gohmert said, repeating the name along with the names of two former National Security Council aides as witnesses he wants to hear from.

Gohmert said the persion he identified was someone he considers a "fact witness." Asked if he was worried about the appropriateness of identifying the person publicly or whether he might have violated whistleblower protection statutes, Gohmert said, "You need to do your homework."

No other lawmakers on the panel, or on the House Intelligence Committee, have publicly named the person, though the individual’s identity has been circulated online by a small number of Trump-aligned figures and media outlets. POLITICO has not independently verified the whistleblower’s identity.

House Intelligence Committee Adam Schiff, who led the Ukraine investigation, warned colleagues last month that any attempt by lawmakers to identify the whistleblower could be an ethics violation. He said the whistleblower had a statutory right to anonymity and to be shielded form reprisal — and he said the whistleblower also had the legal right to contact Congress.

Schiff's office declined to comment Wednesday night.

Though Democrats on the committee didn't acknowledge Gohmert's comment, one Democratic lawmaker reacted furiously.

"House Republicans just committed an incredible and outrageous breach," tweeted Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.). “The President threatened the whistleblower with violence, and whether the person just named is the whistleblower or not they were just put in real danger. This is unacceptable and there should be consequences."

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/11/gohmert-whistleblower-impeachment-083234
 

Gooseifur

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2019
3,765
405
83
The Democrats claim to not no who it is. How can they make this accusation if they don't know who it is?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
81,388
18,080
113
The Democrats claim to not no who it is. How can they make this accusation if they don't know who it is?
'Cuz Trump confirmed it with the partial transcript he released.
No need to even use the whistle blower, Trump gave all the evidence needed.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
47,240
8,195
113
Toronto
The right continue to show what scum they are. Zero morality. Anything to hopefully gain an advantage.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,879
3,506
113
The right continue to show what scum they are. Zero morality. Anything to hopefully gain an advantage.
Because the govt has never thrown whistle blowers in jail before have they?
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
47,240
8,195
113
Toronto
Whistleblowing isn't a crime. They are putting the guy's life in danger.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,879
3,506
113
Whistleblowing isn't a crime. They are putting the guy's life in danger.
It isn't? Ask Assange, Manning and the host of other ones thrown in Jail the last twenty or so years?

Oh wait, if they do it in favor of the military industrial complex then it's fine.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
81,388
18,080
113
It isn't? Ask Assange, Manning and the host of other ones thrown in Jail the last twenty or so years?

Oh wait, if they do it in favor of the military industrial complex then it's fine.
Assange should be in jail for political interference.
If he stuck to impartial whistle blowing instead of colluding with Trump/Stone/Putin he'd still be championed.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,879
3,506
113
Assange should be in jail for political interference.
If he stuck to impartial whistle blowing instead of colluding with Trump/Stone/Putin he'd still be championed.
By impartial you mean only exposing Republicans?

Except now the new WP expose shows just how complicit both parties were.

Asssnge published the unvarnished truth. That's it. He would have done the same if he had emails showing GOP rigged the primaries as well.

That's what the Dems did. And they gave never denied it. Because they got caught Red handed.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
81,388
18,080
113
By impartial you mean only exposing Republicans?
Had Assange just continued to whistle blow on American surveillance and wars he'd be a hero.
Instead he used his inside intel to help Putin put Trump in power.

He took out a vendetta on Clinton only, there were GOP emails stolen and never released.
 

Gooseifur

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2019
3,765
405
83
'Cuz Trump confirmed it with the partial transcript he released.
No need to even use the whistle blower, Trump gave all the evidence needed.
That's not the point. Schiff and his crew keep claiming they don't know who the whistle blower is. If that's the case, how do they know he's being outed by Gohmert. Could they be lying? Democrats aren't capable of lying are they?
 

Gooseifur

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2019
3,765
405
83
The right continue to show what scum they are. Zero morality. Anything to hopefully gain an advantage.
That's not the point, the Dems claimed they don't know who this person is, which is bullshit. How would they know Gohmert is trying to out the whistle blower if they don't know who it is?
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,447
1,331
113
The Democrats claim to not no who it is. How can they make this accusation if they don't know who it is?
They investigated the allegation and the preponderence of the evidence presented thus far supports the allegation...from MULTIPLE sources
 

Gooseifur

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2019
3,765
405
83
They investigated the allegation and the preponderence of the evidence presented thus far supports the allegation...from MULTIPLE sources
That's not the point I was making I agree with you, however the Dems claim they don't know who it is. That's complete bullshit. They lied they know exactly who it is. They lied to the American public during the hearings. Adam Schiff himself said he didn't know who it was yet, he calls out Gohmert for trying to out him. How is this possible if they claim they don't know his identity.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,447
1,331
113
That's not the point I was making I agree with you, however the Dems claim they don't know who it is. That's complete bullshit. They lied they know exactly who it is. They lied to the American public during the hearings. Adam Schiff himself said he didn't know who it was yet, he calls out Gohmert for trying to out him. How is this possible if they claim they don't know his identity.
Its from a pretty small pool of people. They probably know its one of 5 or 6 people.
 

Gooseifur

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2019
3,765
405
83
Its from a pretty small pool of people. They probably know its one of 5 or 6 people.
I disagree, they know exactly who it is, that's why they are making such a big deal out of Gohmert outing him or her.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,879
3,506
113
Had Assange just continued to whistle blow on American surveillance and wars he'd be a hero.
Instead he used his inside intel to help Putin put Trump in power.

He took out a vendetta on Clinton only, there were GOP emails stolen and never released.
What emails? Prove it.

And are you saying the Character of a Presidential candidate isn't up for scrutiny? That obvious corruption of the primary process should be hidden from primary voters just because you don't like the other guy?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
81,388
18,080
113
What emails? Prove it.

And are you saying the Character of a Presidential candidate isn't up for scrutiny? That obvious corruption of the primary process should be hidden from primary voters just because you don't like the other guy?
Emails.
https://www.wired.com/2017/01/russia-hacked-older-republican-emails-fbi-director-says/

Character.
Trump has committed fraud with Trump U, Trump Foundation and his taxes, that we know of.
He's a bullshit artist with 53 accusations of sexual assault against him and multiple suits in action.
The Biden conspiracy theory is slightly crazier than the pizzagate conspiracy theory.

Your judge of character is fucked up.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
47,240
8,195
113
Toronto
That's not the point,
That is MY point.

the Dems claimed they don't know who this person is, which is bullshit. How would they know Gohmert is trying to out the whistle blower if they don't know who it is?
That's not the point. ;) LOL

It could have been any one of the 350 million people that live in the U.S. and in every single case, none of that changes trump's actions. He is being impeached on his actions, not who spilled the beans. Go ahead and keep trying to change the narrative.
 
Toronto Escorts