How many times has this been previously cited? Fine, it's on Page 15 of the Summary for Policy Makers in the IPCC's AR5 report:
I see.
Your repetition of this point is based on two things.
1) the deniers dishonesty
2) your lack of understanding
Your bloggers and lobbyists know full well that the comment about the 15 year period is a statement against cherry picking the dates, they just take those lines out of context to fool you into thinking they mean the opposite. In layman's term, the line is wiggly but going up, when you pick an early high point and draw a line to a later low point on the wiggly line you are cherry picking the dates in full knowledge that the line is heading up. Just as they predicted.
And you, who can fooled by high school level manipulation of graphs, who can't read a graph or the full IPCC report, you just repeat those false claims from your bloggers without understanding how foolish it makes you look. You've been shown this graphic numerous times, but here it is again. It shows how you can pick those cherry picked dates. And yes, that is a legit chart of global surface temperature showing your blogger/lobbyist claims as foolish.
You are spectacularly wrong.
As usual, you are wrong because you can't understand the science or the reports.
You are an easy mark.