Girls Do Porn Cameraman Pleads Guilty, Admits to Lying to Women

[Charlemagne]

This could be the start to ending porn. With Mormon republicans taking over congress and the senate.

Utah led states in porn streams in 2008 I believe. Their members are so horny that porn is always one of the main focuses of their conferences. They use to harass kids about masturbating, til Mike Wallace asked Gordon B. Hinckley about it being inappropriate, on 60 Minutes. Now they ask in vague ways, I think.

When I was active (this was at age 17), my ex-bishop asked if I watched porn and said that he had to have software running at home because of his curiosity. This guy was a high level exec at Procter and Gamble during this time.

Passing a "worthiness" interview is required for a lot of things in the LDS Church, including being able to go to the temple.

 

[glamphotographer]

Utah led states in porn streams in 2008 I believe. Their members are so horny that porn is always one of the main focuses of their conferences. They use to harass kids about masturbating, til Mike Wallace asked Gordon B. Hinckley about it being inappropriate, on 60 Minutes. Now they ask in vague ways, I think.

When I was active (this was at age 17), my ex-bishop asked if I watched porn and said that he had to have software running at home because of his curiosity. This guy was a high level exec at Procter and Gamble during this time.

Passing a "worthiness" interview is required for a lot of things in the LDS Church, including being able to go to the temple.

So they can only see porn for themselves but we can't? I get it. LOL.

 

[Charlemagne]

So they can only see porn for themselves but we can't? I get it. LOL.

People don't understand how dangerous Mormons are. Utah is pretty much a theocracy.

 

[SchlongConery]

When I was younger it was also legal to sleep with a 12 year old
That would be another reason why so many people are "rapists"
Esp with the 16+ crowds

Most of these new laws came into force in past 20 years
Doesn't change the fact they are a steaming pile of horse nonsense

This Forum is pretty interesting in that the anonymity allows us to see into the minds of men like TeeJay who are free to express who they really are.

Can anyone top a rabid anti-masker, anti-vaxxer, conspiracy tin-foiler, COVID-is-nothing-more-than-a-flu, who dismisses laws against having sex with little girls under 12 as "horse nonsense"?

I hope TERB never bans the TeeJay handle as we all now really know what kind of a person he really is and don't have to worry about him just getting anew handle to continue his Life-of-Terb.

 

[Goodoer]

This could be the start to ending porn. With Mormon republicans taking over congress and the senate.

You shut your mouth! (It's pretty much all I got left...)

 

[Goodoer]

This could be the start to ending porn. With Mormon republicans taking over congress and the senate.

You shut your mouth! (It's pretty much all I got left...)

The best GDP was Emily Willis. GDP made her famous.

The really did land some epic babes... I still like the 'normal' looking ladies that turned out to be such lovers of cock...

I think the guys also did MomPOV as well. That was also my "go to"... Women in my age bracket taking hot beef injections... Hot!

 

[Valcazar]

When I was younger it was also legal to sleep with a 12 year old
That would be another reason why so many people are "rapists"
Esp with the 16+ crowds

Most of these new laws came into force in past 20 years
Doesn't change the fact they are a steaming pile of horse nonsense

Age of consent is still 12 if you are less than 2 years older than them. Unless you were talking about when you were 14 years old it hasn't been 12 for over 100 years unless you are talking about the specific loophole that you could get married at 12 in some jurisdictions with parental consent until 2015.

As for the other nonsense, why haven't all these people been arrested and convicted for rape over the last 20 years since you seem to think it is inevitable with a positive consent standard?

 

[TeeJay]

As for the other nonsense, why haven't all these people been arrested and convicted for rape over the last 20 years since you seem to think it is inevitable with a positive consent standard?

They have been
Haven't you noticed all the 20+ year old cases with women suddenly "remembering" they were raped?

 

[Valcazar]

They have been
Haven't you noticed all the 20+ year old cases with women suddenly "remembering" they were raped?

I haven't really.
Even if true, that has nothing to do with affirmative consent being the standard since 1992.
That would be a statute of limitations issue. Canada doesn't have any time limit for the more serious crimes. I don't think it ever has.

 

[TeeJay]

I haven't really.
Even if true, that has nothing to do with affirmative consent being the standard since 1992.
That would be a statute of limitations issue. Canada doesn't have any time limit for the more serious crimes. I don't think it ever has.

Nope not at all
Limitation is US concept only

Does UK? I don't know....

 

[Valcazar]

Nope not at all
Limitation is US concept only

Does UK? I don't know....

UK doesn't for anything over a certain level of crime. Same as Canada (I always assumed Canada followed the British model.)
Limitation isn't a US only concept, it is common throughout the world. It is Canada and the UK that are the minority.

 

[IM469]

I get really torn between politically correct and the point that mature people take responsibility for their own behaviour and stupid decisions.

If anyone releases to the public private sex videos/ photos for profit or revenge - throw the book at the bastard/ bastardess.

but ...

" they were told that the footage would only be available on DVDs in brick-and-mortar porn stores in Australia and New Zealand, and wouldn't reach their own communities. "

They willingly did porn on a commercial media for distribution. Even the if the distributors originally sold it on DVDs - they can't stop content getting eventually copied on the internet. They are not in control of the content at that stage.

If I was the judge I would be torn by the dishonesty of the producers and financially rewarding stupidity. Fraud charges for the producers but $ 50 100 K based on lost royalties. on the porno they agreed to make.

Obviously I'm not judge material.

 

[curr3n_c1000]

I get really torn between politically correct and the point that mature people take responsibility for their own behaviour and stupid decisions.

If anyone releases to the public private sex videos/ photos for profit or revenge - throw the book at the bastard/ bastardess.

but ...

" they were told that the footage would only be available on DVDs in brick-and-mortar porn stores in Australia and New Zealand, and wouldn't reach their own communities. "

They willingly did porn on a commercial media for distribution. Even the if the distributors originally sold it on DVDs - they can't stop content getting eventually copied on the internet. They are not in control of the content at that stage.

If I was the judge I would be torn by the dishonesty of the producers and financially rewarding stupidity. Fraud charges for the producers but $ 50 100 K based on lost royalties. on the porno they agreed to make.

Obviously I'm not judge material.

And thank God you are not one.

The mental gymnastics you are going through to justify your hatred towards these women is disgusting.

Newsflash, the GDP site owners practices are the ones trial, not the women or your beliefs of them.

 

[Male4Strapon]

And thank God you are not one.

The mental gymnastics you are going through to justify your hatred towards these women is disgusting.

Newsflash, the GDP site owners practices are the ones trial, not the women or your beliefs of them.

I don't mean to speak on IM469's behalf but how does what he said suggest hatred of women? These women agreed to do porn........... but they believed it would only be shown in a porn shop.
Once you agree to a camera in an intimate act (even if with your significant other) you risk it being exposed either intentionally or accidentally. These girls should know better than to believe it will never ever go beyond the walls of the shop. IM469 even said the site owners should have the book thrown at them.
I feel badly for these girls not only for being victims but also for their shocking ignorance. People who derive income from creating porn that they themselves don't star in probably aren't the finest of characters and don't deserve to be taken at their word and promises.

 

[IM469]

And thank God you are not one.

The mental gymnastics you are going through to justify your hatred towards these women is disgusting.

Newsflash, the GDP site owners practices are the ones trial, not the women or your beliefs of them.

My hared towards women ? ... I think the correct wording is your hatred towards men.

No where in my post did I suggest just women should take responsibility for their actions. You have some repressed issues that obviously warp your view of fair and equal treatment for men and women alike.

It is totally in your perverse paranoid mindset that sets special rules that should only apply to women. I would apply the same judgement if the plaintiffs happened to be men. I see no reason that the scales of justice or opinion should be twisted because of their gender. Obviously you do.

If you can twist my belief that women and men should be treated equally as a hatred of women - you are a truly sad person. Obviously .in your court, women are completely pliable by men and all men are domineering conniving cavemen. You would be more comfortable in the Victorian era.

I expected people to react to my judgement based on the principle of agreeing to do commercial phonography and suing for an inevitable outcome - not on whether the participants are men or women.

 

[curr3n_c1000]

I don't mean to speak on IM469's behalf but how does what he said suggest hatred of women? These women agreed to do porn........... but they believed it would only be shown in a porn shop.
Once you agree to a camera in an intimate act (even if with your significant other) you risk it being exposed either intentionally or accidentally. These girls should know better than to believe it will never ever go beyond the walls of the shop. IM469 even said the site owners should have the book thrown at them.
I feel badly for these girls not only for being victims but also for their shocking ignorance. People who derive income from creating porn that they themselves don't star in probably aren't the finest of characters and don't deserve to be taken at their word and promises.

How about you start here. What's actually on trail?

When you figure this out then you will realize why you hate women.

 

[Leimonis]

But it was 14 years then; not 12 years.

eh, what's the difference!

 

[Male4Strapon]

How about you start here. What's actually on trail?

When you figure this out then you will realize why you hate women.

Oh boy........

 

[curr3n_c1000]

My hared towards women ? ... I think the correct wording is your hatred towards men.

No where in my post did I suggest just women should take responsibility for their actions. You have some repressed issues that obviously warp your view of fair and equal treatment for men and women alike.

It is totally in your perverse paranoid mindset that sets special rules that should only apply to women. I would apply the same judgement if the plaintiffs happened to be men. I see no reason that the scales of justice or opinion should be twisted because of their gender. Obviously you do.

If you can twist my belief that women and men should be treated equally as a hatred of women - you are a truly sad person. Obviously .in your court, women are completely pliable by men and all men are domineering conniving cavemen. You would be more comfortable in the Victorian era.

I expected people to react to my judgement based on the principle of agreeing to do commercial phonography and suing for an inevitable outcome - not on whether the participants are men or women.

What you did is Reification to introduce the thought of blaming these women.

Your personal feelings mean nothing and they hold no weight in this matter.

So it's either you hate women or you are extremely ignorant.

 

[curr3n_c1000]

Oh boy........

No really I'm asking you, what's is on trail?