CNN has a large pack of idiots who believe "freedom of the press" and "democracy" mean exercising absolutely no common sense.P.S. 2: CNN is broadcasting a lot of info on how to get into the cockpit, secret passwords, etc.
How do they know he deliberately crashed versus had a seizure or passed out?
The aircraft would no descend by itself even if the copilot encountered some sort of health distress. It would simply kept in straight and level flight.How do they know he deliberately crashed versus had a seizure or passed out?
They're saying his breathing was normal and steady (whatever that means). Also, he deliberately pulled some switch that made plane go into a nosedive, plus he wouldnt open cockpit door for the other pilot.How do they know he deliberately crashed versus had a seizure or passed out?
A trail of circumstantial evidence (and remember unlike what television dramas may lead one to believe, circumstantial doesn't mean unconvincing, or second rate).How do they know he deliberately crashed versus had a seizure or passed out?
As already mentioned by Skyrider I suppose that European airlines will immediately adopt a two people in the cockpit rule.
What does a "two person policy" mean? Now they'll need three pilots aboard a plane so that at any given time, there are two pilots in the cockpit? When one has to go to the washroom at least two remain in the cockpit?
The problem in this situation was that one pilot was able to lock the other pilot out of the cockpit.
When I first heard this this morning it was with a sense of utter disbelief. How the Hell do you become so screwed up that you murder 149 people including infants and secondary school students. It doesn't appear to have been political or religious but plain old homicidal/suicidal mania.
It simply means that when one of the pilots needs to leave the cockpit that they are replace by a flight attendant.
I doubt it, the greater danger is still crazies attempting to break into the Cockpit and seize control of the aircraft.The doors will now have an override for the override.
I doubt it, the greater danger is still crazies attempting to break into the Cockpit and seize control of the aircraft.
Don't quote me, but I believe I heard this morning that there have only been seven pilot murder/suicide crashes in the past twenty years and that's everything from puddle jumpers to Airbuses and Boeings.
World wide over 40 years (I know a greater time period) a Hell of lot more than 14.how many terrorist acts? just curious...wanna see them in comparasion...
World wide over 40 years (I know a greater time period) a Hell of lot more than 14.
As a simple glance at the link you provided will show a lot, more than enough to justify secure cockpit doors even excluding 9/11.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_hijackings
in the last 20 years..4 incidents with casualties...the rest were either thwarted or there were no casualties
I disagree...sort of....Carling's link shows a bunch of hijackings, but most did not involve fatalities. I completely agree with the locking of cockpit doors post 9/11 but I think we need to take the possibility of suicidal pilots much more seriously given this crash as well as Malaysian Airlines 370 which was almost certainly the same root cause. A solution needs to consider both scenarios and protect against both -- perhaps separate security codes from flight attendant and pilot/co-pilot that will override any door locks....