Former Trump administration official Kellyanne Conway registers as lobbyist for Ukrainian billionaire with past ties to Trump

[bver_hunter]

Favoritism is rigging.

Favouritism is rigging? Let me define the actual rigging:
The Republicans have been actually rigging the elections all along!!
Even posted how some of them have cast multiple votes. That is the tru rigging of the elections.
Trump even wanted a State to find 11,000+ votes so he could win the elections. That is true rigging!!

 

[Butler1000]

See how you cannot accept the facts and now you are deflecting to the "border czar" bs!!
Are you going to give Kamala credit for re-uniting the children with their parents. Something that you were in denial of?

No, she didn't do it.

 

[Butler1000]

Favouritism is rigging? Let me define the actual rigging:
The Republicans have been actually rigging the elections all along!!
Even posted how some of them have cast multiple votes. That is the tru rigging of the elections.
Trump even wanted a State to find 11,000+ votes so he could win the elections. That is true rigging!!

When you favor one candidate over another in a primary, that's rigging. I guess I will have to continue to explain it in simple terms.

 

[squeezer]

Nope. Breaking points, Kyle Kulinski, Rational National, as examples. I also have Apps for CBC, CNN, Reuters. On my Android box I have CP24 for local.

I give links to good sources, you just are trapped in a bubble.

Does this sound familiar? Is this what I told you in previous posts? Take it in BUTT, take it in.

 

[Butler1000]

Does this sound familiar? Is this what I told you in previous posts? Take it in BUTT, take it in.

No idea. But if it's her answering it's a gaslight. She has had a rough time lying for this administration.

 

[squeezer]

No idea. But if it's her answering it's a gaslight. She has had a rough time lying for this administration.

Since you are always concerned about the "big donors" that control the party, this clip should interest you and you might learn something. John Morgan is an informative and entertaining guest regardless if you're a leftie or a rightie or the claim of a "third party voter"

 

[Frankfooter]

Since you are always concerned about the "big donors" that control the party, this clip should interest you and you might learn something. John Morgan is an informative and entertaining guest regardless if you're a leftie or a rightie or the claim of a "third party voter"

rump is panicking that his billionaire AIPAC donors aren't doing enough

Republicans panicked after "contentious" Trump phone call with top GOP donor Sheldon Adelson

Republicans fret over Trump’s tiff with one of the Republican Party’s top donors: report

www.salon.com

 

[squeezer]

rump is panicking that his billionaire AIPAC donors aren't doing enough

Republicans panicked after "contentious" Trump phone call with top GOP donor Sheldon Adelson

Republicans fret over Trump’s tiff with one of the Republican Party’s top donors: report

www.salon.com

Who wants to pour money into a sinking ship!!!

GO KAMALA GOOOOOOOO!!!!!​

 

[Butler1000]

Since you are always concerned about the "big donors" that control the party, this clip should interest you and you might learn something. John Morgan is an informative and entertaining guest regardless if you're a leftie or a rightie or the claim of a "third party voter"

Let me get this straight. You complain about my links......

Then you post one from a washed fired Ex CNN pundit who was ousted for nepotistic shilling of his Democrat Governor Brother, to cover all the dirty shit said Governor was doing?

And you think this is legit?

Wow!

 

[bver_hunter]

No, she didn't do it.

The Biden administration that Harris is a part of, did reunite the children with their parents!!

 

[bver_hunter]

When you favor one candidate over another in a primary, that's rigging. I guess I will have to continue to explain it in simple terms.

Well then the Republicans did all the rigging to nominate Trump even when he did not attend any of the debates. They favoured that felon!!
So, what is your point?

 

[Butler1000]

Well then the Republicans did all the rigging to nominate Trump even when he did not attend any of the debates. They favoured that felon!!
So, what is your point?

Well.....I guess my point continues to stand.

The Democrats and GOP are both bad. You just admitted it on another point. The primaries are useless
In their present form

 

[Butler1000]

The Biden administration that Harris is a part of, did reunite the children with their parents!!

That's like saying some low level bureaucrat in the Forestry division is also responsible.

 

[Valcazar]

Oh no, they rigged it, admitted it, and have since chosen to continue to do it now that the cats are out if the bag.

Ahh, so they "admitted" it, but just not in any way you can point to in the actual court case.

 

[y2kmark]

See, that's why I can respect your posts. The others? They are too scared to for fear of Trump.

Trump is a traitor, anyone who's scared of him is an even worse traitor...

 

[Butler1000]

Ahh, so they "admitted" it, but just not in any way you can point to in the actual court case.

Yes they did, stop gaslighting.

 

[Valcazar]

Well I can, being willing to jump in anywhere at my age.
> Continuing to supply heavy, sophisticated weapons to IDF, who are fueled by politics of revenge.

> They (principally Nancy Pelosi) shit all over Sen. Al Franken. He should be Kamala's running mate - funnier older guy from Minnesota

> Old Joe Biden is failing to use his newly granted powers of impunity to at least stop blatant attempts to subvert the American electoral process. There's lots else, but please, that one important step.

I might be able to think of more, just don't ask me to criticize the Repugs since I don't have all friggin' night!!!

Of course you can think of more, there's LOTS of things to criticize the Democrats for.

The way they are currently handling the Gaza situation is trying to thread a needle that I don't think they can thread anymore.
I'd like to see much more serious overtures to Iran and a move away from the "2 out of 3 against the third" approach and more of an even arms length from all three position.

The whole approach to American hegemony in general is too concerned with shoring up an old position instead of looking for a smoother path to a new equilibrium.

The immigration position is still far too enforcement "tough-on" in focus.

While I know the US population is mostly with them in both of the above cases, I think there is more room to maneuver into a better position.

The entire carceral state is a problem and I want to see the Democrats be much bolder about reforms there.

I agree about Biden and the Dems in general needing to be more aggressive in their protections of voting rights and the electoral process.

They've been too timid on the Supreme Court as well.

FAR too much institutionalism in the party overall. (Abolish or wildly modify the filibuster, get rid of the blue slips, etc.)

Expanding on the advances of the ACA and moving even further in supporting health care access and results.

 

[Valcazar]

First off, there will be no kids in cages under a Harris administration and I'm sure you know that.

That's probably not true.
Because you have to remember that "kids in cages" refers to multiple things.

One - it was short hand for the deliberate family separation approach the Trump administration undertook.

Two - Physically, kids have at times been put in various forms of temporary accommodation which has included cages (chain link fences separating groups in a larger building).

The second one has absolutely happened under multiple administrations, and will be pointed to as "proof" that the Democrats border enforcement is "exactly the same" or "indistinguishable" from Trump's.

And the fact is that the US public really has a hankering for being "tough on immigration" and the Democrats have not spent much (if any) political capital fighting that.
Biden sure as fuck didn't. It was clearly very low priority for him.

So yes, I expect we will see 'kids in cages' at some point under Harris because if there are too many people in the system at any given point, they will be put in temporary housing and it will be shitty and terrible.

I do NOT expect Harris to enforce the border in the same way as Trump did.

 

[squeezer]

That's probably not true.
Because you have to remember that "kids in cages" refers to multiple things.

One - it was short hand for the deliberate family separation approach the Trump administration undertook.

Two - Physically, kids have at times been put in various forms of temporary accommodation which has included cages (chain link fences separating groups in a larger building).

The second one has absolutely happened under multiple administrations, and will be pointed to as "proof" that the Democrats border enforcement is "exactly the same" or "indistinguishable" from Trump's.

And the fact is that the US public really has a hankering for being "tough on immigration" and the Democrats have not spent much (if any) political capital fighting that.
Biden sure as fuck didn't. It was clearly very low priority for him.

So yes, I expect we will see 'kids in cages' at some point under Harris because if there are too many people in the system at any given point, they will be put in temporary housing and it will be shitty and terrible.

I do NOT expect Harris to enforce the border in the same way as Trump did.

If you look closely you will see Trump's book scattered all over the tables

 

[Valcazar]

Yes they did, stop gaslighting.

So please point to the place they admitted it in that court case.

Since I am "gaslighting", this should be trivial to do.