Now I know why my load glows flourecent green.hickorysticks said:where one who works with hazardous materials
Now I know why my load glows flourecent green.hickorysticks said:where one who works with hazardous materials
99 Regina Street in Waterloo or 150 Main Street in Cambridge. Check dates and times on their website. www.region.waterloo.on.caDizzle said:Where would you go in Waterloo Region for an anonymous test? Like most, I am pretty confident there is no problem, but maybe I should check it out.
I never heard any agency owner do anything on making sure the ladies are tested.dsc said:This is one big point why established indies and agencies are the way to go when hobbying. I hate remembering that at one time Record ads were the way to go. But I am assuming the agency owners do their bit on making sure the ladies are tested. I've always played it safe, honestly sometimes I didn't want to, but it's the SP rules (thankfully).
I agree it is dumb to publish her real name. It is the alias that we need to know. I guess the LE would rather create a panic among all SP's clients, to teach us a lesson.
The rapid test is only available in waterloo (Wednesday morning till 3pm), not in cambridge.the squid said:99 Regina Street in Waterloo or 150 Main Street in Cambridge. Check dates and times on their website. www.region.waterloo.on.ca
Testing is completely confidential but not anonymous. Staff there are very professional.
This is wrong. There are documented cases by CDC for receptive oral partner.Sweet Samantha said:Ok, fear mongerers, it is me again!
Let's reclarify that THEORETICALLY this is low risk. There is absolutely no evidence (other than anecdotal, which is
NOT evidence) that it has ever been contracted thru bbbj/bbbjcim or any other type of oral activity.
We must also not forget the larger controversy over AIDS. I have no wish to suggest I don't believe it is a serious syndrome, but it has happened thousands of times around the world where people have been diagnosed with AIDS when it turns out not to be true. Only Australia has the best test to date. Many other circumstances create the same results: starvation is 1. It is widely believed that it is not as rampant in Africa as originally thought.
And let's get 1 thing clear: AIDS is not contractable. It is a syndrom that results from something else that you may or may not have contracted thru sexual acts or needle sharing.
However, it is HIV that people need to be aware of. Yet, if you do a search of very reputable medical journals, you will find that there is growing evidence to suggest that HIV is not the cause of AIDS because they have found many individuals who have undergone numerous testing confirming they have AIDS & yet never test positive for HIV. And there are many wo have tested for HIV & never progress to AIDS.
So, what I am trying to say is, to date no one really knows fuck about the cause(s) of HIV or AIDS. Be smart, where a condom during fs. With respect to BBBJ or DATY, herpes is your greater concern. Keep your eyes open.
Sam
I second that notion.Stoo said:Sam, your information is completely wrong and it shows an astonishing ignorance of the science behind this syndrome. You are "splitting hairs". True enough... AIDS, per se, is not "contractible". But the link to HIV is irrefutable and there is absolutely no doubt...NONE... that HIV is spread through sexual contact as well as needle sharing. Your statement is analagous to saying that a cold is not contractible. Technically, I suppose this is true. But the virus which causes colds, Rhinovirus, is extremely contageous.
With great suspect, for a woman working in the industry your belief that AIDS is caused by "something else" should be of great concern, not only for your own well-being, but also that of your clients. I am not aware that "starvation" can give a false positive test result, but regardless, the incidence rate of starvation in KW probably isn't of huge concern. This is why these tests need to be repeated and always are in the case of a positive reading.
I suggest you read the information from CDC which I linked to above... and then re-read it until you understand it.
xyzz said:WTF is going on at Mistys?? They heard the news from Sophia kiss and Tasha’s BF…. why was Tasha still working until she got arrested??.
Thank you, that is the most intellegent thing I have heard all day.millwhite said:Ahhh I think your wrong on that. According to the information I got from the health nurse at the sexual health clinic. If you are HIV postive, you are obigated by law to reveal that to any sexual partners you have. No you don't have to tell your friends and employer but if your infected and having sex with an SP then you are obigated to tell her ( and in some cases him, not that there's anything wrong with that) and vice versa
Actually you're dead wrong. Knowingly exposing a partner to HIV is a crime. In fact there is a guy in the courts now in Hamilton having been charged with first degree murder and aggravated assault for doing just this. As you can see from the following article, this is serious stuff...gundam789 said:In this case you can`t hold the girl responsible of infecting those guys.
Your post is a shining example of complete and utter ignorance of the law and sexual responsibility. You are correct that the results of the test are private. However, at the moment you choose to engage in sexual behavior (protected or not) you must, by law, reveal your positive status to your partner. At least you agree that someone is morally obligated to do this, but in fact you are legally responsible to warn someone that your are about to play Russian Roulette with them.gundam789 said:PS An HIV test is a personal thing and under no circumstances the status of the person can be revealed. In other words this alone gives the right to an HIV positive person not to be obligated to reveal her HIV status.