Family in London mowed down by driver

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,023
11,260
113
Catholics in Ulster feel themselves an oppressed but that doesn't justify the bombing campaigns of the IRA. Like most conflicts, the solution is a political one and is made less likely by the use of terrorism.
The bombing campaign brought the Brits to the peace table and the result is the Good Friday Agreement.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,793
23,507
113
Yes, Israel has been enforcing border restrictions on their border since 2007. In case you missed it, that was 2 years after Israel evacuated every Israeli from Gaza.

Despite the embargo on weapons and occasionally dual use items, Israel has shipped in thousands of trucks of aid, thousands of litters of fuel and millions of megawatt-hours of electricity every month. And despite construction supplies being limited to UN and other charitable causes, Hamas has managed to build a massive underground complex all over Gaza. Just as one example of Hamas' theft, Qatar sent millions to Gaza meant as direct payments for people in need yet Hamas took 40% of that money for themselves.

And how much aid has shipped in through Egypt? Oh that's right, you think Israel is forcing Egypt to not send aid.

Again, how many malnourished Palestinians are their in the PA ruled West Bank where their agenda is not endless war with Israel?
Cool story. Only problem is that its a lie.
The Israeli blockade has made Gaza 'unliveable' as the UN warned it would be.
You can hate on Hamas all you like but the collective punishment on the 2 million people living in Gaza who aren't Hamas is a massive war crime.

As Amnesty says:
Israel maintained its illegal blockade on the Gaza Strip, subjecting its residents to collective punishment and deepening the humanitarian crisis there.

Hamas should be taken to the ICC but that doesn't justify Israeli war crimes and collective punishments.
Posting in support of apartheid against the Muslim people of Gaza and Palestine in this thread is really distasteful, basketcase.

Pretending you are against Islamaphobia in the same thread you defend Israeli apartheid and war crimes is just too much.

Amnesty calls for investigation into Israeli bombing of Gaza media tower
Amnesty International says Israeli attacks on civilians are war crimes
 
Last edited:

contact

Well-known member
Aug 1, 2012
3,629
988
113
I'm referring to international law, not emotion.
1 - Killing a family sleeping in their home is a war crime, if you argue that it was a military target you have to prove it and until you do, its a war crime.
2 - You also have to prove its not a 'disproportionate response', which given the deaths and the destruction in Gaza, is going to be very hard
3 - Killing a military leader at home with their family is a war crime.
4 - Targeting media outlets, hospitals, schools, residential towers are all assumed war crimes, like state terrorism, until you prove that they were legit military targets. Israel has not done so.
Its all here:





That's because Israel is the military power occupying and ruling Gaza.
Not Egypt, they listen to Israel on this issue.
Actually Frank you have to prove it both ways so once you provide evidence that Hamas did not use that apartment building surrounding area or tunnel underneath it for military purposes then that apartment will be clear until then it’s a military target

It has been 100% proven in the past hamas used schools and hospitals for military use new tunnels go underneath them which makes them valid military targets

Proving it’s not disproportionate targets is easy hamas has been proven to use civilians women and children and civilian structures to launch attacks Israel is allowed to stop attacks

Targeting Designated Terrorists anywhere at any time id perfectly legal especially with eminent attacks or attacks currently going on

Are you upset some of your terrorist leaders got killed? Taking a leadership position and hummus means you have a very short lifespan and I’m going to guess most people on this board are not upset about that
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phil C. McNasty

Smooth60

Member
Jan 9, 2017
299
2
18
I heard his colleague talking to CTV on an exclusive interview about him.

Thanks for this. I had not seen this.

However, I will say that without a little more context about the conversation Veltman was engaged in at the time I wouldn't say that his statement is strong indication of animus. His other friend of middle east said they had discussions on religion all the time and never got the impression that he had any hatred for Islam per se.

It's all speculation at this point and anyone making definitive statements to the effect of his state of mind on any issue is probably more interested in promoting an agenda.

Gotta wait to see what evidence authorities have.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,793
23,507
113
Of course there was hate. There's just no evidence yet its right-wing hate.
Are you saying left-wingers cant hate?? How do you know he's not a Liberal (assuming he even votes)??
Its not left wingers on this board who post from 'jihadwatch'.
Left wingers spent their summer marching with BLM, not doing this.

Do you know the meaning of the word "may"?

As I said. It could be war crimes if the strikes on civilians were intentional or that the military value was smaller than the civilian risk.
33 media outlets were destroyed by Israel, yet here you are defending destroying these civilian targets.

Again, these attitudes are the fodder from which right wing, Islamaphobic terrorism is coming from.
Supporting terrorism and defending a country that is today holding another police protected 'death to Arabs' march through land they are illegally occupying is part of the problem that gave us the London attack.

You are on the side of apartheid and oppression of Muslims in Palestine, you are part of the problem.
 

contact

Well-known member
Aug 1, 2012
3,629
988
113
Its not left wingers on this board who post from 'jihadwatch'.
Left wingers spent their summer marching with BLM, not doing this.



33 media outlets were destroyed by Israel, yet here you are defending destroying these civilian targets.

Again, these attitudes are the fodder from which right wing, Islamaphobic terrorism is coming from.
Supporting terrorism and defending a country that is today holding another police protected 'death to Arabs' march through land they are illegally occupying is part of the problem that gave us the London attack.

You are on the side of apartheid and oppression of Muslims in Palestine, you are part of the problem.
Nice try Frank it is the left wingers on this board who do a lot of things how many times have you been banned from here ? you directly threatened me with violence you claim you’re not a racist but after telling you English was not my first language
You kept making fun of it and teasing me about it then you told me I wasn’t Canadian enough and I should leave Canada

You are Terrorists supporter frank
Hamas regularly has parades where they chant death to Jews you failed to mention that Hamas goal is to kill Jews you conveniently overlook that as well you support a group who uses suicide bombings drive-by shootings and kidnappings Hamas also kidnaps tortures murders and rapes the people who live there in order to force them into submission
 
Last edited:

xmontrealer

Well-known member
May 23, 2005
10,239
7,698
113
What is the classic definition of fanatics? People who can't change their minds, and won't change the subject.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,126
6,904
113
Cool story. Only problem is that its a lie.
...
I love how you call something a lie and then refuse to even show why.

You admitted yourself that there were no noticeable border restrictions on Gaza until 2007, 2 years after Israel removed all Israelis from Gaza and then say I'm lying when I agree with you. That is a sign of a real obsession.

How many restrictions are on shipments to the West Bank where the government isn't actively engaged in terrorism? Same Israel, same ethnicities involved. How do you explain the differences? I also see you have no comment on Hamas stealing significant amounts of financial and material aid impacts the needy in Gaza. of course you don't see it possible to blame anyone other than Israel. Egypt also has a border with Gaza. Why aren't you demanding Egypt send more aid there or allow international aid? And yes, Egypt's actions in 1949 and the results of the Egyptian-Israeli peace deal played a huge role in the establishment of Gaza.

But we all know that you are psychologically incapable of Israel occasionally does good things or occasionally the bad things were contributed to by Palestinian leaders.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,126
6,904
113
Its not left wingers on this board who post from 'jihadwatch'.
...
And how is Jihadwatch any different than electronic intifada or many of the sources of the tweets you think are news? They both have a very clear agenda to make a group of people look bad
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,126
6,904
113
When you are invaded and occupied by a foreign power you do what you have to do to subdue them. Actually, maybe not you? Maybe, you can just ask them nicely to leave?
So yes, praising terrorism just like Franky.

p.s. if you're obsessed with ancient history and not the people living there today, the Scots were invaders from Ireland.
 

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,023
11,260
113
p.s. if you're obsessed with ancient history and not the people living there today, the Scots were invaders from Ireland.
They weren't Irish, they were Vikings.

Not praising terrorism, praising resistance.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,126
6,904
113
They weren't Irish, they were Vikings.

Not praising terrorism, praising resistance.
Sorry but civilian targets is terrorism. If they restricted their bombing to military targets I might agree with you. The might part is because far more progress has been made since the IRA, UDA, and the rest agreed to stop committing terrorism.

You and franky should hang out some time.

p.s. I'll stand by the description of the Scots being Irish settlers which is why Scotch Gaelic is from the same branch as Irish Gaelic instead of the Brythonic/Pictish branch. Norse became part of the story later. That means the Ulster Scots were simply going home.
 
Last edited:

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
93,793
23,507
113
And how is Jihadwatch any different than electronic intifada or many of the sources of the tweets you think are news? They both have a very clear agenda to make a group of people look bad
You say this replying to a post where I link articles by CBC, Reuters and one on Amnesty?
I also link articles by Haaretz and Jerusalem Post.

For instance, here's an image of a protest in Prince Rupert, posted at the CBC.
I'm sure you'll call them a hate site now as well.

 

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,023
11,260
113
Sorry but civilian targets is terrorism. If they restricted their bombing to military targets I might agree with you.
When there is a huge power imbalance, you do what you have to do.
Question: Why do you support invasion, occupation and oppression?


The might part is because far more progress has been made since the IRA, UDA, and the rest agreed to stop committing terrorism.
The progress is due to the Brits finally agreeing to talk peace, due to the bombing campaign, and the result is the Belfast Accord.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts