No, pappy the sky isn't falling. The earth is heating up. The lead reseacher was from NASA's Goddard Institute, and paints a pretty bleak picture.
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/15003895/
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/15003895/
WoodPeckr said:Fear not!
Watch for Exxon, Mobil, Texaco, who are staffed with 'the best scientists money can buy', come up with a counter-report dismissing all that evidence as fantasy!
Their response will claim it was all the results of 'icebeg-hugging' liberals out to sully the fine names of Exxon, Mobil, Texaco!.......
Don I acknowledge the fact that many people of science feel the earth is headed twards a cataclysmic end, resulting from heat.DonQuixote said:You're either totally innocent of the constant stream
of information coming out of the science community,
or you're intentionally ignoring the obvious.
Problem is that there's huge potential markets and
profits for those that get into the green industry
today. But, the old money controls the political
agenda and they want to keep their share of the
market.
Pappy, I anticipated your response and told you it wasn't necessary. I'm guessing science wasn't your best subject in school.papasmerf said:THE SKY IS FALLING
I did well just quested the idea of basing fact on theory. Still do.Asterix said:Pappy, I anticipated your response and told you it wasn't necessary. I'm guessing science wasn't your best subject in school.
And tell us in what previous cycle the temperature was this high.papasmerf said:However I subscribe to this being a natural cycle.
I do not pretend to have the figures on temperature. As far as I know it has been recorded for the past 140 years or so. Beyond that is conjecture.shack said:And tell us in what previous cycle the temperature was this high.
And tell us in what previous cycle the amount of carbon in the atmosphere was as high as currently.
And tell us why it's just a coincidence that the scientists prediction of temperature rising concurrently with carbon levels is exactly what's happening.
Yeah, and I'm pretty sure if you had been living at the time, you would have been one of the last to give it up.papasmerf said:Don't forget that just a few centuries ago, people knew the world was flat.
Likely I would have questioned the moving horizon. And set off to see the edge.Asterix said:Yeah, and I'm pretty sure if you had been living at the time, you would have been one of the last to give it up.
Mores the pity.papasmerf said:Likely I would have questioned the moving horizon. And set off to see the edge.
When there were evergreens in the antarctic.shack said:And tell us in what previous cycle the temperature was this high.
Dinosaur time rings a bell.shack said:And tell us in what previous cycle the amount of carbon in the atmosphere was as high as currently.
Unlike some, I believe that there is a combination of Human impact and natural cycles. I'm not worried for the earth. So what if we get wiped out.shack said:And tell us why it's just a coincidence that the scientists prediction of temperature rising concurrently with carbon levels is exactly what's happening.
In that case your reasoning for not addressing the problem "because it is a cycle" is based on conjecture since this supposed previous cycle of high temperatures you refer to was more than 140 years ago.papasmerf said:I do not pretend to have the figures on temperature. As far as I know it has been recorded for the past 140 years or so. Beyond that is conjecture.
No in reality, I do not see it as a problem, as presented.shack said:In that case your reasoning for not addressing the problem "because it is a cycle" is based on conjecture since this supposed previous cycle of high temperatures you refer to was more than 140 years ago.
Then you choose to live in blissful ignorance. What are you pappy, nearly 50? If I remember correctly we were born in the same year. Likely it isn't going to affect us that bad. The next generations are going to catch hell.papasmerf said:No in reality, I do not see it as a proble, as presented.