"People who have recovered from Covid do have natural antibodies, but the CDC and other experts recommend they also get the vaccine. In fact, people who had the disease and receive the Covid shot may develop stronger protection against virus variants.
These stats make for a compelling case against getting vaccinated considering we just don't know the long term effects.......
However the pro jab crowd will not acknowledge them in the least.
Their attitude is that if you don't get jabbed you are a threat.
These stats make for a compelling case against getting vaccinated considering we just don't know the long term effects.......
ARR (and NNV) are sensitive to background risk—the higher the risk, the higher the effectiveness—as exemplified by the analyses of the J&J's vaccine on centrally confirmed cases compared with all cases:
both the numerator and denominator change, RRR does not change (66–67%), but the one-third increase in attack rates in the unvaccinated group (from 1·8% to 2·4%) translates in a one-fourth decrease in NNV (from 84 to 64).
Uncoordinated phase 3 trials do not satisfy public health requirements; platform trials designed to address public health relevant questions with a common protocol will allow decisions to be made, informed by common criteria and uniform assessment. These considerations on efficacy and effectiveness are based on studies measuring prevention of mild to moderate COVID-19 infection; they were not designed to conclude on prevention of hospitalisation, severe disease, or death, or on prevention of infection and transmission potential. Assessing the suitability of vaccines must consider all indicators, and involve safety, deployability, availability, and costs.
Not really, the article did not say vaccines don't work.
Not really, the article did not say vaccines don't work.
To be honest, that article (it is a "Comment" piece, not a peer reviewed study) is "much ado about nothing".
Using "ARR" (absolute risk reduction) absolutely makes no sense. RRR, relative risk reduction, is what we should use.
I'll give you an example - about 0.07% of the Canadian population is found to have colon cancer each year.
Now, let's say I invent a wonder drug that can prevent 90% of the colon cancer, would everyone agree that would be great?
So using RRR of 90% - everyone understands the number and what it means.
Now, if I tell you the ARR of this wonder drug is 0.06% - it just does not make sense to most people, and some may ask "so 0.06% is pretty insignificant, is it not?"
So just throwing out a ARR number without any reference would make no sense to most people and should not be used.
Fauci says? Variants? CNBC?
whatever dude.
Yes so that must be why the countries who have vaccinated large portions of their populations have had significant drops in covid cases and deaths. It must be just a coincide !
That must be why the USA who was terrible at managing covid is now reopening their economy since their vaccinated population is high.
Most stupid question EVER !