Dead beat parent?

mynameisearl11

New member
Aug 16, 2011
1,713
4
0
vaughan
According to government reports there are more than 135,000 mostly 'dads' failed to pay child supports in Ontario. If my SO filed for a divorce,she would have to pay me so I can keep up with my hobby:D
 

out4fun

Active member
Jan 8, 2008
971
45
28
I have 2 kids -one lives with me full time, one shared...and I pay her $2,000 per month. The system seems a bit fucked if you have a penis...but I never miss a payment.
 

Celticman

Into Ties and Tail
Aug 13, 2009
8,890
89
48
Durham & Toronto
Given that the govt. agency can suspend drivers licenses and garnishee wages, I am surprised at the high number.
 

Scarey

Well-known member
I'm of two minds on this issue.Yes, I've had friends who have simply gotten screwed with their pants on when it came to child support.amounts that went to partying,the new Bf, and no where near the child.

The other side is a more personal experience.My wife's children's(2) father was a deadbeat..pure and simple....definition of the term....he has not had a licence in 10 years....works tax free jobs as much as he can to avoid paying.His belief was that since the kids were living with us(the judge refused him partial custody) we should be paying 100%(Like they were some type of toys he didn't get to play with instead of human beings).They are good children and the last turns 18 in 1 year and 3 months.I'll have my say then.I really wish the federal government would go after more of these particular deadbeats...
 

probyn

Well-known member
Mar 4, 2010
1,103
178
63
I'm of two minds on this issue.Yes, I've had friends who have simply gotten screwed with their pants on when it came to child support.amounts that went to partying,the new Bf, and no where near the child.

The other side is a more personal experience.My wife's children's(2) father was a deadbeat..pure and simple....definition of the term....he has not had a licence in 10 years....works tax free jobs as much as he can to avoid paying.His belief was that since the kids were living with us(the judge refused him partial custody) we should be paying 100%(Like they were some type of toys he didn't get to play with instead of human beings).They are good children and the last turns 18 in 1 year and 3 months.I'll have my say then.I really wish the federal government would go after more of these particular deadbeats...
But you should also look at the men's perspective: they have to pay alimoney but don't get shared custody or access to the kids.
 

fmahovalich

Active member
Aug 21, 2009
7,260
24
38
I have 2 kids -one lives with me full time, one shared...and I pay her $2,000 per month. The system seems a bit fucked if you have a penis...but I never miss a payment.

What were some of the financial numbers at the time of the split. A stay at home Mom..with no earnings..tends to get money...aside from custody issues.
 

Capital Amatuer

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2004
1,166
674
113
Given that the govt. agency can suspend drivers licenses and garnishee wages, I am surprised at the high number.
When I was younger I had a friend who worked in the tow truck business. He would go out to the late-night RIDE programs. He mentioned it wasn't the number of drivers who were impaired that surprised him, but rather the number with suspended licenses. These people likely don't have insurance either, they may have the pink slip but very likely have cancelled it. As far as I know, the Police have no means to verify if a policy is still in force during a road side check. It should be no surprise the number of licensed suspended and uninsured drivers there are.

If an employer receives a garnishment notice from the Ministry of Social Service, it is an added burden to the employer for record keeping and remittances. The employer is obliged to comply. It usually doesn't take long for the employee to quit and try finding work under the radar.

At this point, you've no license, no insurance, no job and likely a poor credit rating. I'm not saying this happens all the time, but some will let the situation escalate.
 

SillyGirl

Can't Touch This
Apr 9, 2010
501
1
0
Wandering Aimlessly
But you should also look at the men's perspective: they have to pay alimoney but don't get shared custody or access to the kids.

Alimony and child support are two different issues.

A man paying child support should be able to see his children, unless the Court has determined he is a danger to them in some way.

It makes me sick how some people use their kids as pawns in their battles with exes.
 

Scarey

Well-known member
But you should also look at the men's perspective: they have to pay alimoney but don't get shared custody or access to the kids.
To clarify.He had full access to the kids.....I even drove them to his house for overnights and weekends.I see where your coming from and can only speak of personal experience.This guy was a fuck up.
 

freedom3

New member
Mar 7, 2004
1,430
7
0
Toronto
A man paying child support should be able to see his children, unless the Court has determined he is a danger to them in some way.
That's right. If a man is too poor to pay child support, then he should not be allowed to see his children. You have a perfect understanding of the legal system.
 
Jan 24, 2012
2,328
0
0
this is WRONG
the Insurance companies are ONLINE with the Ministry of Transportation and the cops can ABSOLUTELY verify current insurance coverage during a roadside stop. They actually have the licence plate scanner now too that can identify from a scan of your plate if a) you are licenced b) you are insured c) the plates are the correct plates for that vehicle d) that you have unpaid fines or 407 toll bills.

Please don't think that pink slip is gonna save your ass ... cause it won't.
CORRECT.... & thank goodness because most with no insurance or licence have had poor driving habbits & are a danger on the road.
 

KBear

Supporting Member
Aug 17, 2001
4,165
1
38
west end
www.gtagirls.com
He would go out to the late-night RIDE programs. He mentioned it wasn't the number of drivers who were impaired that surprised him, but rather the number with suspended licenses.
Think the police are no longer allowed to check your drivers license and insurance at RIDE type stops, unless you are being charged or there is some reason to check. Has been like this for many years.
 

krazyplayer

Member
Jun 9, 2004
484
1
18
dead beat parent's are a big deal. At my job they actually have a policy that they will not accept the resignation of an employee for 2 weeks because so many guys quit when they are ordered to pay child support. When most of them take the time to think it over they don't quit, but some do. This is a good unionized job with great benefits and good pay and I am stunned when guys will give it up out of rage over supporting their own kids. I know guys who have left the province because they thought they would lose their license for non payment. Half the women in our office are divorced and only one gets child support payments and that's only because her ex husband works for the government and it's garnished. A lot of women with kids will end up on welfare and we will be paying for the kids when the deadbeats can't be bothered. It's one thing if they can't - but most just won't. I proudly pay it - although I am trying to end the payments now that the "kids" are in university. They wouldn't have got this far without it.
 

SillyGirl

Can't Touch This
Apr 9, 2010
501
1
0
Wandering Aimlessly
That's right. If a man is too poor to pay child support, then he should not be allowed to see his children. You have a perfect understanding of the legal system.
I was actually referring to guys who pay the support and still get dicked around about visitation, but you do raise a good point.

Is he poor through no fault of his own, making an effort, doing his best? Of course he should be able to see them.

Is he poor because he chooses not to work so he won't have to contribute to the support of his children? Or does he just appear poor because he's choosing to work under-the-table so he won't have to contribute? No, he should not be able to see them. Why should he reap the benefits of parenthood when he's actively avoiding the responsibility?

Just my opinions, not intended as a legal analysis.
 

freedom3

New member
Mar 7, 2004
1,430
7
0
Toronto
dead beat parent's are a big deal. At my job they actually have a policy that they will not accept the resignation of an employee for 2 weeks because so many guys quit when they are ordered to pay child support. When most of them take the time to think it over they don't quit, but some do. This is a good unionized job with great benefits and good pay and I am stunned when guys will give it up out of rage over supporting their own kids. I know guys who have left the province because they thought they would lose their license for non payment. Half the women in our office are divorced and only one gets child support payments and that's only because her ex husband works for the government and it's garnished. A lot of women with kids will end up on welfare and we will be paying for the kids when the deadbeats can't be bothered. It's one thing if they can't - but most just won't. I proudly pay it - although I am trying to end the payments now that the "kids" are in university. They wouldn't have got this far without it.
I think I would have a tough time paying it. It just strikes me as crazy that on a divorce, she gets the kids and he gets the bills. I guess this is why I can't get married. This just makes no sense to me.
 

freedom3

New member
Mar 7, 2004
1,430
7
0
Toronto
Is he poor because he chooses not to work so he won't have to contribute to the support of his children? Or does he just appear poor because he's choosing to work under-the-table so he won't have to contribute? No, he should not be able to see them. Why should he reap the benefits of parenthood when he's actively avoiding the responsibility?

Why should she reap the benefits of parenthood without having to work? And to any woman who says that raising kids is work, just tell her that he will get the kids while she gets a job. She will immediately make it clear that she is not getting a job.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,467
6,990
113
this is WRONG
the Insurance companies are ONLINE with the Ministry of Transportation and the cops can ABSOLUTELY verify current insurance coverage during a roadside stop. ...
I was just reading this on my latest plate renewal. Great in my books because I have often had to go back to the car because I forgot my insurance there. I really don't mind 'big brother' constantly scanning plates as they drive to get the unlicensed and uninsured off the road.


Being a child of divorce, it's good that we have a system to try and make sure kids get what they are due but the basis of the system is still a touch antiquated and guys tend to get screwed when it comes to custodial issues.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,467
6,990
113
I think I would have a tough time paying it. It just strikes me as crazy that on a divorce, she gets the kids and he gets the bills. ...
Bills for half the essentials sure seems reasonable to me. I have a divorced buddy who gets alimony from his wife but also pays child support to her with no complaint.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,467
6,990
113
I think that if you choose to have children then you are financially responsible for those kids until at least age 18. As for child support I don't know how that works legally, but I would think how much you pay is relevant to how much you make. I doubt the courts would force you to pay more than you can afford. Correct me if I am wrong.
If your ex-spouse has a good layer they can. If later on your financial situation changes for the worse you can apply for a change but it costs, time, effort, and money.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts