Fewer councillors means more competition for better ones...this would help the dead wood issue you have agreed with.On the municipal level, yes, more representation is better.
I've dealt with my city councillor a few times, and she's good but overworked and response is slow. Doubling the number of people calling her means less chance you get through or get anything done.
There are deadweight councillors, true, and we could use a wave of new people in but Ford's move is a petty attack on Toronto that would not save the city enough money to justify the loss of representation.
Invoking the notwithstanding clause is a big risk for Ford. He screwed up and wasn't prepared for the city to fight back or for the courts to not support him. Now he has to go full on attack or look like a weak idiot who had no idea what he's doing, other then a spite filled petty grievance with those who wouldn't vote for him. Now he has to hope he can pass the notwithstanding, though that's going to be a circus event. He said in the presser that he'd also appeal, and if that's the case then he'd likely be stuck with an appeal that won't happen until after the election and a move to the withstanding that needs to wait until the appeal.
He's just not very bright, certainly he's in way over his head with this politicking.
The issue of reducing city council is not the point any more, its the clownish absurdity and irresponsibility of using the notwithstanding clause on such a minor issue.Fewer councillors means more competition for better ones...this would help the dead wood issue you have agreed with.
Did Dumb DOFO mention that he Council size should be chopped down when he was a Councillor? Why was it not on his Platform in the Provincial Elections??Fewer councillors means more competition for better ones...this would help the dead wood issue you have agreed with.
Question: What do you call a person who campaigns for the election to be Premier of the Province of Ontario and wins?The buck-a-beer Premier says he was democratically elected by 2.3 million people in this year’s election. What he’s choosing to ignore is that 3.3 million people voted for someone else. Premier Dougie is not the voice of a majority of Ontarians. Not even close.
Did Rob or Doug Ford take their salaries when they were on Council? They said many times that council was dysfunctional and didn't get things done. Part of the dysfunction was the size of it. Doug also mentioned reducing the size of counil in his book. Why is everyone shocked? Inform yourself maybe?Did Dumb DOFO mention that he Council size should be chopped down when he was a Councillor? Why was it not on his Platform in the Provincial Elections??
JohnLarue beat me to this (thanks JL) so I'm providing the info again from his post. btw I noticed you didn't respond to his post below and conveniently changed the subject to something else. Care to pick up where you left off?This would be Toronto money, not Ontario.
It will have zero impact on the Ontario budget.
(not to mention that it was claimed to be $25 million over 4 years)
Try again.
Fewer councillors means more competition for better ones...this would help the dead wood issue you have agreed with.
He's promised to use it again. He also has "ultimate respect for judges" yet has just over-ruled one.The issue of reducing city council is not the point any more, its the clownish absurdity and irresponsibility of using the notwithstanding clause on such a minor issue.
Attached Bill 5 with the notwithstanding clause and the pass the bill again on Wednesday. Which is checkmate and game over !!Ford's gov't lawyers went 'crickets' when questioned by the judge about 'why the rush' to enact the law and 'what was considered' when enacting the law.
Unable to win in a court of law as his 'law' was unconstitutional, discriminatory and arbitrary Ford is promising a bombshell of a response.
His vindictiveness, vengeance and yes hate for Toronto is so vile that the probability that he will invoke Section 33 "The Notwithstanding Clause" to ram his decree down the throats of his hated Toronto is quite high.
Irrelevant.Did Rob or Doug Ford take their salaries when they were on Council?
Irrelevant...just like your perpetual quest to impress me.Irrelevant.
Like the rest of your content.
Attached nonwithstanding clause on Bill 5 and and the revote the bill 5 again and it checkmate!!Great news ! 19 long time career councillor positions saved !!
Time to create 47 provincial and federal ridings in Toronto to preserve our democratic access to government !
:wave:Irrelevant...just like your perpetual quest to impress me.
I know it's hard, but you may want to read up on the reasons why judges are appointed and not elected.PS Doug was elected with a mandate to govern Ontario and it is within his right to pass Bill # 5 not some stupid liberal judge . PLus this stupid liberal is unelected!! FU To liberal unelected judge!! Thank god for the Notwithstanding
Clauses plus you can thank ************ Trudeau for the nonwithstanding clauses when he reparated the constitution!!
LOL.. Checkmate!! attached notwithstanding clause to Bill 5 . Game over!! you can cry all you want!!I know it's hard, but you may want to read up on the reasons why judges are appointed and not elected.
AND, the judge was appointed by an ELECTED government.I know it's hard, but you may want to read up on the reasons why judges are appointed and not elected.
Exactly. Not hard to find out that fact and why we appoint not elect judges in this country.AND, the judge was appointed by an ELECTED government.
Too bad these children are too stupid to comprehend that.