Massage Adagio
Toronto Escorts

Court stops Doug Ford from changing council size!

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,447
1,331
113
using the notwithstanding clause on this shows that Dougy is about astute..ok maybe slightly less astute then Kim Jong Un. what a clown. IDIOT!!!
 

kono

Member
May 19, 2009
523
0
16
John Tory - this should be a referendum issue that should be voted on by the people of Toronto. Yep, then no one can say shit. No more presumptions made by politicians about "what people want". But we might not get that opportunity? And for all we know that referendum could go in Ford's favor if their was one?
 

essguy_

Active member
Nov 1, 2001
4,432
16
38
Using the the Notwithstanding clause for THIS issue, in these circumstances is like using a shotgun to kill a fly - stupid and dangerous. Ford has NO MANDATE to do this. I've heard him say in today's interviews that the people of Ontario gave him a mandate. Yes - but not to do this or any other stupid thing done for petty reasons. There is no good argument to disrupt an election already in progress. There is no balance here that can justify this action. If he ran on doing this it would be different. But he didn't. If he did it before the candidate nomination process began it would be different. But the timing didn't work - better luck next time.

Ford saying he has a mandate from Ontario to fuck around with Toronto's election is just wrong. Period.
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
On the municipal level, yes, more representation is better.
I've dealt with my city councillor a few times, and she's good but overworked and response is slow. Doubling the number of people calling her means less chance you get through or get anything done.

There are deadweight councillors, true, and we could use a wave of new people in but Ford's move is a petty attack on Toronto that would not save the city enough money to justify the loss of representation.

Invoking the notwithstanding clause is a big risk for Ford. He screwed up and wasn't prepared for the city to fight back or for the courts to not support him. Now he has to go full on attack or look like a weak idiot who had no idea what he's doing, other then a spite filled petty grievance with those who wouldn't vote for him. Now he has to hope he can pass the notwithstanding, though that's going to be a circus event. He said in the presser that he'd also appeal, and if that's the case then he'd likely be stuck with an appeal that won't happen until after the election and a move to the withstanding that needs to wait until the appeal.

He's just not very bright, certainly he's in way over his head with this politicking.
Fewer councillors means more competition for better ones...this would help the dead wood issue you have agreed with.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,447
1,331
113
Fewer councillors means more competition for better ones...this would help the dead wood issue you have agreed with.
The issue of reducing city council is not the point any more, its the clownish absurdity and irresponsibility of using the notwithstanding clause on such a minor issue.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,585
5,740
113
Fewer councillors means more competition for better ones...this would help the dead wood issue you have agreed with.
Did Dumb DOFO mention that he Council size should be chopped down when he was a Councillor? Why was it not on his Platform in the Provincial Elections??
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
The buck-a-beer Premier says he was democratically elected by 2.3 million people in this year’s election. What he’s choosing to ignore is that 3.3 million people voted for someone else. Premier Dougie is not the voice of a majority of Ontarians. Not even close.
Question: What do you call a person who campaigns for the election to be Premier of the Province of Ontario and wins?

Answer: Premier
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
Did Dumb DOFO mention that he Council size should be chopped down when he was a Councillor? Why was it not on his Platform in the Provincial Elections??
Did Rob or Doug Ford take their salaries when they were on Council? They said many times that council was dysfunctional and didn't get things done. Part of the dysfunction was the size of it. Doug also mentioned reducing the size of counil in his book. Why is everyone shocked? Inform yourself maybe?

It was on his election platform...reduce the size of government. Last I checked Toronto Council is government no? Why would that not qualify seeing as you are hung up on his campaign platform? Does it qualify or not?
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
This would be Toronto money, not Ontario.
It will have zero impact on the Ontario budget.
(not to mention that it was claimed to be $25 million over 4 years)

Try again.
JohnLarue beat me to this (thanks JL) so I'm providing the info again from his post. btw I noticed you didn't respond to his post below and conveniently changed the subject to something else. Care to pick up where you left off?

"Once again you show your ignorance
https://www.fraserinstitute.org/blog...-revenue-tools

At present, Ontario’s municipalities fund their expenditures via a combination of property tax revenues, federal and provincial transfers, and user fees. About 42 per cent of Ontario municipal revenues come from property taxation with federal and provincial government transfers accounting for another 21 per cent
What was that about Toronto taxpayers separate from Ontario taxpayers?

Why do you go to such lengths to mislead others?"
 

essguy_

Active member
Nov 1, 2001
4,432
16
38
Fewer councillors means more competition for better ones...this would help the dead wood issue you have agreed with.

This only works if the changes are made BEFORE the nomination process. When it is done after, the entire nomination process is made into a bad joke. You can't merge candidates from different wards because the changing boundaries makes the whole process different. Different Wards had different issues, different demographics - so entirely different than the merged Wards. This is a very bad precedent. What next - use the Notwithstanding clause to change the number of MPP's in the next provincial election to 4 with two from Etobicoke? Ford had no mandate to do this and is abusing his power. Not a good sign with 4 years left.
 

explorerzip

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2006
8,168
1,333
113
The issue of reducing city council is not the point any more, its the clownish absurdity and irresponsibility of using the notwithstanding clause on such a minor issue.
He's promised to use it again. He also has "ultimate respect for judges" yet has just over-ruled one.
 

PornAddict

Active member
Aug 30, 2009
3,620
0
36
60
Ford's gov't lawyers went 'crickets' when questioned by the judge about 'why the rush' to enact the law and 'what was considered' when enacting the law.

Unable to win in a court of law as his 'law' was unconstitutional, discriminatory and arbitrary Ford is promising a bombshell of a response.

His vindictiveness, vengeance and yes hate for Toronto is so vile that the probability that he will invoke Section 33 "The Notwithstanding Clause" to ram his decree down the throats of his hated Toronto is quite high.
Attached Bill 5 with the notwithstanding clause and the pass the bill again on Wednesday. Which is checkmate and game over !!
Bottom line 25 councillor and the rest will be unemployed and nothing can be done... LOL.


PS Doug was elected with a mandate to govern Ontario and it is within his right to pass Bill # 5 not some stupid liberal judge . PLus this stupid liberal is unelected!! FU To liberal unelected judge!! Thank god for the Notwithstanding
Clauses plus you can thank Pierrre Elliot Trudeau for the nonwithstanding clauses when he reparated the constitution!!
 

PornAddict

Active member
Aug 30, 2009
3,620
0
36
60
Great news ! 19 long time career councillor positions saved !!
Time to create 47 provincial and federal ridings in Toronto to preserve our democratic access to government !
Attached nonwithstanding clause on Bill 5 and and the revote the bill 5 again and it checkmate!!
Game over ... LOL
 

explorerzip

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2006
8,168
1,333
113
PS Doug was elected with a mandate to govern Ontario and it is within his right to pass Bill # 5 not some stupid liberal judge . PLus this stupid liberal is unelected!! FU To liberal unelected judge!! Thank god for the Notwithstanding
Clauses plus you can thank ************ Trudeau for the nonwithstanding clauses when he reparated the constitution!!
I know it's hard, but you may want to read up on the reasons why judges are appointed and not elected.
 

PornAddict

Active member
Aug 30, 2009
3,620
0
36
60
I know it's hard, but you may want to read up on the reasons why judges are appointed and not elected.
LOL.. Checkmate!! attached notwithstanding clause to Bill 5 . Game over!! you can cry all you want!!
 
Toronto Escorts