Court has ruled Emergencies Act during Trucker convoy was unconstitutional
- Thread starter Phil C. McNasty
- Start date
No they weren't. Trudeau said himself that the only way out of the lockdowns was even more restrictions and still encouraging Canadians to take even more covid shots. The truckers convoy is what mad the CONservatives jump ship and start speaking against the restrcitions and vaccine mandates. Either way a court found the Emergency Act unlawful. There was never a threat to national security. Friendly reminder that after 911 on the airports were shut down and that was only for a very short period.
Last edited:
Um, yes they were. It was at the tail end of the Omicron wave.
How else do you think BUSINESSES WERE OPEN? To be affected? People couldn't get to work? Kuds to school? We were open again.
It wouldn't happen if you don't mouth off, and challenge the cop's every word like Freedum Twats would do. Instead, it's yes sir, no problem and usually you get a "thank you, sir, have a good day".
Um, you must have forgotten that the vast, vast majority of the mandates, restrictions and closures that affected the vast, vast majority of Canadians were the sole jurisdictional responsibility of and legally enacted by provincial governments, right?
Now we can all understand that the FreeDumb twats, their sycophants and defenders were either to doltish to be aware of the above; were aware of the above but didn't care anyway or a combination of the two. Yet the fact remains their siege of Ottawa was purposely not directed at the direct sources of their tantrums, Doug Ford and the other premiers who deprived them of their so-called freedom, but an attempt to exact a political price against their
Last edited:
What part of the fact that a federal judge, found that the Liberal party of Canada shat on the constitution and pissed on the the charter of rights, are you struggling with?
it’s not that hard or convoluted despite your channel changing.
Last edited:
Good news!
There's a new convoy you can join!
Some supporters of a far-right convoy headed to the Texas border are calling for civil war
A group that has referred to itself as "God's Army" said it's planning three peaceful assemblies Saturday. The convoy has attracted only small numbers so far.
They still don't get there was absolutely no justification in invoking the Emergency Act and that there was zero proof that the truckers although disrupting the city of Ottawa were not a threat to national security and in way planning to overthrow the government or commit any terrorist actions.
The privileged elites talk good games and always deny. That’s what they do.
They are just dumb red necks, that can’t grasp they are digging their own graves. Certainly politically and potentially one day, litterally if they don’t wake up.
One third of Canadians say they have a lot in common with Freedom Convoy protesters
'Clearly a good number of people share frustration with the seemingly endless pandemic and the measures that are making life uncomfortable'
nationalpost.com
Fact Sheet: ‘Freedom Convoys’ and Anti-Vaccine Demonstrations in Canada
New data on Canadian convoy protests and the police response.
acleddata.com
‘Fringe minority’ in truck convoy with ‘unacceptable views’ don’t represent Canadians: Trudeau | Globalnews.ca
The convoy initially kicked off with a focus on protesting COVID vaccine mandates — especially the one aimed at truckers. Now, organizers are trying to keep supporters on message.
globalnews.ca
Toronto police to pay $16.5m to protesters wrongfully held at 2010 G20 summit
Claimants to receive up to $24,700 in historic settlement after police encircled 1,100 people and carried out mass arrests
amp.theguardian.com
Last edited:
Trying to find a point that is responding to what I said.
Unless it is "the people I want to step down don't step down" which... sure, ok.
I don't need you to give me answers in life.
I am pointing out your Trump comparison doesn't seem apt and asking for clarity on what you think the decision means for Trudeau given that inapt comparison.
I'm very happy with the court decision.
I think it was thoughtful and measured, and I tend to agree with its reasoning.
I hope it results in some re-drafting of the Emergencies Act itself to allow for changes in how national crises are defined given changes in society since late 20th century.
I think the people who had their bank accounts frozen should consider civil action depending on the specifics of their case.
in your opinion.
Of coarse it’s not hypocritical to scream but the constitution the constitution the constitution and use a centuries old “provides comfort”…means no court of law..
then turn around when a judge says “the constitution”
Nor is it hypocritical to scream the 2nd is centuries old, but hey, let’s use this obscure piece centuries old legislation to by pass the highest legal opinion.
nor is it hypocritical to scream “but the judges say” Trump did this and Peterson that. Then turn around and squirm like worms on hooks when a government abuses it power over the peons..and a judge says so.
If you want to accuse some on the R of doing little different. Knock yourself out, you won’t be wrong. But this is about a currently sitting admin that’s shat on the constitution and pissed on the charter of rights.
And we all know, every single lefty here would scream bloody blue murder if I put my hands on a disadvantaged person of colour without meeting the legal threshold to do so…never mind cuffs on them, or..much much worse
Last edited:
Still trying to see how this relates.
Do you, or do you not, think that the decision by this Federal court means that Trudeau is obligated to step down legally?
Do you, or do you not, think that the decision by this Federal court means that Trudeau is obligated to step down morally?
Do you, or do you not, think that the decision by this Federal court means that the Canadian People should - in good conscience - vote Trudeau and the Liberals out?
And since you are going to ask.
No, obviously this has no legal weight obligating Trudeau to step down.
No, I don't think this decision obligates him to step down morally, having read the decision.
No, I don't think this obligates the Canadian people to vote them out, although every Canadian should take the decision (as with all government behavior) into account when considering their vote.
go back to what was initially said V. Stop projecting
Or twisting on a hook. They are all hypocritical and massive relatively speaking. In particular the last one.
Right now, step out on a huge limb and tell me you wouldn’t call for a cops head that abused their power.
Leaders of truck convoy protests sought to overthrow government, national security adviser says
Protests that clogged Ottawa were sufficient to justify use of the Emergencies Act, Jody Thomas tells the Ottawa Conference on Security and Defence
www.theglobeandmail.com
They should have never thawed them out and still be under deep freeze. Too bad I'm not in charge!!
Last edited:
Yet a judge saw otherwise. I guess the national security adviser doesn't really have a clue of what their job is. Ass kissers like you are never put in charge. Once a brown nosing lackey always a brown nosing lackey.Leaders of truck convoy protests sought to overthrow government, national security adviser says
Protests that clogged Ottawa were sufficient to justify use of the Emergencies Act, Jody Thomas tells the Ottawa Conference on Security and Defence
They should have never thawed them out and still be under deep freeze. Too bad I'm not in charge!!
That is not nice, I didn't call you any names. Yes, I may have in my mind but I did not do so on my keyboard. Shame on you, I am so offended, hurt and devastated.
