Toronto Escorts

Cop who killed George Floyd stabbed in prison

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,848
2,309
113
I don't think he intended to kill him, but maybe inflict pain and show him who's boss. And I also don't know the difference between 2nd and 3rd degree murder and manslaughter is in Minnesota. But it also has some striking similarities to that dude in New York who was choked to death for selling loose cigarettes. The point here is they both used illegal restraint techniques that resulted in the person's death. It is also important to remember that in the eyes of the law, the victims were technically not guilty of any crime at that point. So, their deaths can be viewed as an extrajudicial murder.
Why do you say he used an illegal restraint? Wasn't the evidence that officers in his police force were trained in the use of neck restraints? Or does it just become illegal when it causes more harm than expected, or isn't done correctly?

In your opinion, didn't Chauvin have probable cause to arrest Floyd, and didn't Floyd's refusal to be put in the back seat of the police car, and his wrestling with officers, provide just cause to restrain him in some manner? Police forces around the world have used neck restraints thousands of times without anyone suffering serious injury or dying. Can't just about ANY form of restraint lead to serious harm or death, depending on the medical status of person being arrested? Was Chauvin made an example of because he didn't recognize that Floyd's distress was real? If so, that's a pretty tough perspective.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarcoHardOnFire

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
23,395
47,071
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
Now, be honest, do you think Chauvin intended to kill Floyd, or even thought there was any possibility that what he was doing would kill Floyd, or rather that he just didn't believe that Floyd was in the state of physical distress he was (leaving aside why he was in distress)?
Chauvin is guilty of reckless endangerment though and he's white and Floyd was black. Then it's all caught on video for eternity.

Thus mitigating Floyd's past and medical issues.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DinkleMouse

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,581
2,476
113
Why do you say he used an illegal restraint? Wasn't the evidence that officers in his police force were trained in the use of neck restraints? Or does it just become illegal when it causes more harm than expected, or isn't done correctly?

In your opinion, didn't Chauvin have probable cause to arrest Floyd, and didn't Floyd's refusal to be put in the back seat of the police car, and his wrestling with officers, provide just cause to restrain him in some manner? Police forces around the world have used neck restraints thousands of times without anyone suffering serious injury or dying. Can't just about ANY form of restraint lead to serious harm or death, depending on the medical status of person being arrested? Was Chauvin made an example of because he didn't recognize that Floyd's distress was real? If so, that's a pretty tough perspective.
Because police know about positional asphyxiation, know what to do and what not to? See above link.
 

MarcoHardOnFire

Massive
Jun 17, 2023
367
228
43
Because police know about positional asphyxiation, know what to do and what not to? See above link.
Hate to break it to you, but someone who can keep saying "I can't breath" loud enough to be heard 15 feet away, can in fact, breath. Dude died of an overdose, all else in political theater paid for by Xi.
 

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
8,258
7,713
113
Hate to break it to you, but someone who can keep saying "I can't breath" loud enough to be heard 15 feet away, can in fact, breath. Dude died of an overdose, all else in political theater paid for by Xi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,581
2,476
113
Hate to break it to you, but someone who can keep saying "I can't breath" loud enough to be heard 15 feet away, can in fact, breath. Dude died of an overdose, all else in political theater paid for by Xi.
So tell us all, how little, how very little you know about it. Tell us all how little you know about human anatomy and bodily functions.. Question for you. If a person is struggling to breathe, even say from smoke inhalation. You’re saying they can’t cry for help? Yes you just did. Look at you go.

Also, when I was in my teens we did wall tokes. Suck in lungfuls of smoke. Back against a wall while friends pushed on our chest until we passed out. Mega hint..You must have lived a pretty boring youth..…

And while at it, tell us all why police get training on it, what not to do, what to do as soon as the cuffs are on. Which is to roll them on their side…( called a recovery position) and from there help them sit or stand…Why they get suspended and or fired when they don’t. Why their employers get sued for big bucks when they don’t, and in an exceptional case of abuse. Why they go to jail
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SchlongConery

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
82,052
18,334
113
So tell us all, how little, how very little you know about it. Tell us all how little you know about human anatomy and bodily functions.. Question for you. If a person is struggling to breathe, even say from smoke inhalation. You’re saying they can’t cry for help? Yes you just did. Look at you go.

Also, when I was in my teens we did wall tokes. Suck in lungfuls of smoke. Back against a wall while friends pushed on our chest until we passed out. Mega hint..You must have lived a pretty boring youth..…

And while at it, tell us all why police get training on it, what not to do, what to do as soon as the cuffs are on. Which is to roll them on their side…( called a recovery position) and from there help them sit or stand…Why they get suspended and or fired when they don’t. Why their employers get sued for big bucks when they don’t, and in an exceptional case of abuse. Why they go to jail
Wow, yes, we should totally take as gospel the opinion of an ex cop, investment banker, health care worker over the published autopsy reports by experts who actually looked at the body.
 

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
3,621
4,434
113
Why do you say he used an illegal restraint? Wasn't the evidence that officers in his police force were trained in the use of neck restraints? Or does it just become illegal when it causes more harm than expected, or isn't done correctly?

In your opinion, didn't Chauvin have probable cause to arrest Floyd, and didn't Floyd's refusal to be put in the back seat of the police car, and his wrestling with officers, provide just cause to restrain him in some manner? Police forces around the world have used neck restraints thousands of times without anyone suffering serious injury or dying. Can't just about ANY form of restraint lead to serious harm or death, depending on the medical status of person being arrested? Was Chauvin made an example of because he didn't recognize that Floyd's distress was real? If so, that's a pretty tough perspective.
It is my understanding that the use of choke holds and other neck restraints have been banned in most police forces. The reason? Too many deaths or injuries to people being arrested. It is banned in Canada, LA, NYC and many places across the US (apparently they are banned in 24 states). I cannot speak about its use in other places. As for the question if Floyd should have been arrested, of course! Nobody has issue with him being arrested, they have issues with him dying during the arrest. The whole "Chauvin was made an example" argument is weak sauce. He used a restraint for a VERY long time (9 fucking minutes) where Floyd was not fighting back or anything. Was he power tripping? Maybe. Was he trying to send a message? Maybe. Did he mean to kill Floyd? No, I doubt it. But the end result was he choked the life out him slowly but surely. And none of the cops that were with him did anything to intervene. That is why this was a real problem here.

I think some people don't understand what the Black Lives Matter movement is about. It isn't that they are better than anyone, it's a reminder to police that they are people and they matter as well. While we know police have shot and killed unarmed white people, they have a horrible track record when it comes to POC. Time and time again, we see video or hear stories about how they shot and killed people who might have been running away (like Michael Brown in Ferguson, MS), or from the use of illegal chokeholds (like Eric Garner in NY). And don't get me started on the cop who shot and killed a 12 year old with a toy gun virtually immediately after he got out of his car (Tamir Rice in Cleveland). He was basically executed. The cop shot first before even telling the kid to put the gun down. Tell me that would've happened with a white kid...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Not getting younger

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,848
2,309
113
It is my understanding that the use of choke holds and other neck restraints have been banned in most police forces. The reason? Too many deaths or injuries to people being arrested. It is banned in Canada, LA, NYC and many places across the US (apparently they are banned in 24 states). I cannot speak about its use in other places. As for the question if Floyd should have been arrested, of course! Nobody has issue with him being arrested, they have issues with him dying during the arrest. The whole "Chauvin was made an example" argument is weak sauce. He used a restraint for a VERY long time (9 fucking minutes) where Floyd was not fighting back or anything. Was he power tripping? Maybe. Was he trying to send a message? Maybe. Did he mean to kill Floyd? No, I doubt it. But the end result was he choked the life out him slowly but surely. And none of the cops that were with him did anything to intervene. That is why this was a real problem here.
So you are not arguing that neck restraints were contrary to the police use of force policy that Chauvin had been trained in at the time. The evidence at trial included that officers received training in the application of neck restraints. I have to assume that this was not the first time that Chauvin or other officers in his police force used this restraint. This was, however, the first time anyone died in connection with its use. As stated by me in any earlier post, ANY restraint CAN be deadly, depending on the medical condition of the suspect. Whether Chauvin is as "evil" as some try to paint him to be depends on whether he had any reasonable belief that what he was doing would lead to serious injury or death. In the end, he's certainly responsible for his error of judgement. He should have checked on Floyd when his pleading became persistent. Whether murder was the right charge is debatable to me. I believe his murder conviction appeal is still pending. The fact that no other officers intervened just tells me that NONE of the cops at the scene believed that Floyd was about to die. I don't believe that any of these cops were seeking Floyd's death. I think this was a case of bad judgement, possibly tainted by irritation at Floyd's poor behaviour, not a case of cops deciding to publicly execute a relatively low level criminal.

I think some people don't understand what the Black Lives Matter movement is about. It isn't that they are better than anyone, it's a reminder to police that they are people and they matter as well. While we know police have shot and killed unarmed white people, they have a horrible track record when it comes to POC. Time and time again, we see video or hear stories about how they shot and killed people who might have been running away (like Michael Brown in Ferguson, MS), or from the use of illegal chokeholds (like Eric Garner in NY). And don't get me started on the cop who shot and killed a 12 year old with a toy gun virtually immediately after he got out of his car (Tamir Rice in Cleveland). He was basically executed. The cop shot first before even telling the kid to put the gun down. Tell me that would've happened with a white kid...
There are no stats that prove that in the US a higher percentage of black crime suspects who resist, threaten the police or others, or flee are killed than white crime suspects who resist, threaten the police or others, or flee. All the stats prove is that black Americans have more encounters per capita with police, are charged more often per capita, and are jailed more often per capita. All that means is that there is a problem with crime in black communities (mostly black on black crime). There will be no solution until the real problem is recognized, and that problem is NOT that the police are looking to shoot black suspects.

Time and time again there are sensational stories. And time and time again they prove to be something else entirely.

Don't get me wrong, there's plenty of bad policing. We ask some pretty dumb people to make some pretty difficult decisions. However, EVERYONE encounters this, not just black people.

Of course, the best way not to be shot and killed by police continues to be to ensure that you don't commit any crimes.
 
Last edited:

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,581
2,476
113
Dutch there’s truth in that too. People so often forget the world is rarely black or white..

I suspect a lot of what might be said or argued is in the first three paragraphs of this. Including the fact, that the defence for other officers involved was that training was inadequate for stopping excessive force. That’s an admission in their eyes Chauvin was/is guilty.

Couple with the fact he did so for 9 long minutes, nor did he/they get him into a recovery position.
And although police body camera video shows that Lane was rebuffed when he twice asked if they should roll Floyd onto his side — something Blackwell testified is critical — he still had a duty to intervene
Nor did he, provide any care which they are obligated to do, once it was obvious even to them he was in distress. Say like CPR
 
Last edited:

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
18,686
5,245
113
Lewiston, NY
Nope. But you'd think an ex cop would be in the protective custody wing, along with other more "targeted" crims.
Nothing in the article says he wasn't. I'm sure there were measures in place, otherwise he never would have made it to his bunk the first night...
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
28,703
51,164
113
Have you tried googling it?? The DEA and RCMP estimate it to be at 2mg.
Yes.
I have googled it.
That's why I know that is an estimate by law enforcement and not - in fact - the LD50.
Because the human LD50 is unknown.
You would also know it isn't 2mg because "2 mg" is not a dose.
It's a flat amount.

11 ng/mL is a dose.

Of course if your tolerance is high it would take a larger dose.
But if you've never taken fentanyl before, and some unscrupulous drug dealer mixes it with a batch of cocaine, you would probably drop dead at 2 to 3mg.
This has happened before. A lawyer (who I knew) here in Toronto OD'ed because he thought he was just taking cocaine:


He was never into fentanyl.
He was just a weekend coke user.
And now he's dead.

RIP
Of course you can die from a small dose - especially if you aren't a habitual user.
That means the very fact that Floyd was a user means that you can't use the non-user dose as "proof" of what a lethal dose for him should be.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SchlongConery

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
28,703
51,164
113
I don't think he intended to kill him, but maybe inflict pain and show him who's boss. And I also don't know the difference between 2nd and 3rd degree murder and manslaughter is in Minnesota.
His highest charge was unintentional second degree murder.
"He didn't intend to kill him" isn't an issue here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: silentkisser

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,397
3,715
113
Yes.
I have googled it.
That's why I know that is an estimate by law enforcement and not - in fact - the LD50.
Because the human LD50 is unknown.
You would also know it isn't 2mg because "2 mg" is not a dose.
It's a flat amount.

11 ng/mL is a dose.



Of course you can die from a small dose - especially if you aren't a habitual user.
That means the very fact that Floyd was a user means that you can't use the non-user dose as "proof" of what a lethal dose for him should be
I think you should try the 2 mg dose and report back to us
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Valcazar

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,848
2,309
113
His highest charge was unintentional second degree murder.
"He didn't intend to kill him" isn't an issue here.
It's not as clear cut as that. Here's the statute:


Charges under the unintential murders subsection still require either:

a. A commission of a separate felony that leads to the unintentional death. While the death can be unintentional, the separate felony would require intention. The question in the Chauvin case is - what was the separate felony if the arrest and restraint itself was lawful?

or,

b. intentionally inflicting bodily harm on someone who is the restrained under an order for protection (inapplicable to the Floyd case).

Because it was a jury verdict, there is no explanation on the record of what the jury thought was a separate felony. I think that the jury, being ordinary citizens, likely misapplied or failed to apply the statute in an intellectually disciplined way. I think they felt that Chauvin's actions were intended to cause pain to Floyd, and that made the arrest an assault. Unfortunately, they didn't apply enough consideration to the justification for applying a restraint during the arrest that would necessarily cause pain to the suspect. I think it would be very easy for someone with no experience in applying a statute to get confused about this.

Many people will be happy that the verdict came down the way it did. It probably prevented widespread rioting. However, SCOTUS should have conducted a very close review of whether the trial record supports a finding by the jury of separate felony, and whether they were properly instructed. SCOTUS provided no comments in refusing the case.
 

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
18,686
5,245
113
Lewiston, NY
Is all this about the dude who got shanked with a shiv? How is he doing, anyway?
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
28,703
51,164
113
It's not as clear cut as that. Here's the statute:


Charges under the unintential murders subsection still require either:

a. A commission of a separate felony that leads to the unintentional death. While the death can be unintentional, the separate felony would require intention. The question in the Chauvin case is - what was the separate felony if the arrest and restraint itself was lawful?
Third-degree assault, if I remember correctly.

Because it was a jury verdict, there is no explanation on the record of what the jury thought was a separate felony. I think that the jury, being ordinary citizens, likely misapplied or failed to apply the statute in an intellectually disciplined way. I think they felt that Chauvin's actions were intended to cause pain to Floyd, and that made the arrest an assault. Unfortunately, they didn't apply enough consideration to the justification for applying a restraint during the arrest that would necessarily cause pain to the suspect. I think it would be very easy for someone with no experience in applying a statute to get confused about this.
The prosecutors argued that Chauvin assaulted Floyd. The jury didn't have to make up or misapply anything.
You may not think that Chauvin assaulted Floyd, but the jury did.
Proving he did was part of the trial or they couldn't get second degree unintentional murder.
Of course, they also found him guilty of third degree murder and second degree manslaughter - so even with your argument he would still be in jail.


Many people will be happy that the verdict came down the way it did. It probably prevented widespread rioting. However, SCOTUS should have conducted a very close review of whether the trial record supports a finding by the jury of separate felony, and whether they were properly instructed. SCOTUS provided no comments in refusing the case.
SCOTUS doesn't need to of course.
But also there doesn't seem to be much reason to.
I don't see why the jury finding for the assault would be questioned. It isn't like they had to guess what the assault was or made it up.
 
Toronto Escorts