Canada Creates Second Class Citizenship

twizz

Banned
Mar 8, 2014
1,973
0
0
https://bccla.org/2015/06/its-official-second-class-citizenship-goes-into-effect/

It’s official – second class citizenship goes into effectPosted on**June 3, 2015**by**BCCLA

Last Friday, part of Bill C-24 went into effect, officially creating a two-tier citizenship system.**As a result of this new law, dual citizens and people who have immigrated to Canada can have their citizenship taken away while other Canadians cannot. The**government’s press release**last week tried to justify this discriminatory law by raising the threat of “jihadi terrorism,”**but Bill C-24 could easily be used against non-terrorists—for example, a journalist who is convicted of a “terrorism offence” in another country for reporting on human rights violations by the government.

Under this law, the only Canadians who can never lose their citizenship are those born in Canada who do not have another nationality (and are not eligible to apply for another nationality). No matter what crimes they may be accused of, these first-class citizens can never have their citizenship taken away. On the other hand,**Canadians with another nationality (and those who are eligible to obtain another nationality) now have second-class status, even if they were born in Canada: under Bill C-24, their citizenship can be stripped.

Currently, citizenship can be taken away mainly on the basis of crimes that are considered threats to Canada’s national security, like terrorism or espionage, or demonstrations of disloyalty to Canada, like treason. But legal experts warn that the list of offences that could lead to the removal of citizenship might be expanded in the future. Additionally, Bill C-24 punishes criminal activity with exile – a practice abandoned hundreds of years ago that has no place in today’s democracy.

The government has**created an infographicto explain the new citizenship stripping process. There’s one change that really stands out for us in this diagram: the absence of a judge in the new system. The government seems to think that removing the judge improves the process, but we would argue that this makes the process unfair and likely unconstitutional.

Dividing people into different classes that receive different treatment under the law is unfair and un-Canadian.**Bill C-24 has turned millions of Canadians into second-class citizens with reduced rights—and as a result, has reduced the value of Canadian citizenship.

We encourage you to share**this petition**with your friends and family and to let them know about these important changes to the very foundations of citizenship in Canada. Let’s say no to second-class citizenship!

The BCCLA remains committed to challenging this new law in the courts. It is only after the law**comes into force (as it did last Friday) that this kind of court challenge is possible.**Be sure to sign up to our list to receive updates on our progress with this court challenge.

Previous Post:**We’re hiring! Outreach and Communications Coordinator

Sign The Change.Org Petition To Protest This

https://www.change.org/p/hon-chris-alexander-pc-mp-canadian-government-stop-bill-c-24-don-t-turn-millions-of-us-into-second-class-canadian-citizens?recruiter=92963508&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=share_facebook_responsive&utm_term=mob-xs-petition_update-no_msg
 
The current government, which I supported, gave me a pause with C-36. C-24 will force me seek alternative place to park my vote and political donations. Oh well, it was fun while it lasted.
 
The current government, which I supported, gave me a pause with C-36. C-24 will force me seek alternative place to park my vote and political donations. Oh well, it was fun while it lasted.

A man immigrates from the middle east and becomes a Canadian citizen. He then commits terrorist activities which kill innocent people. He should be stripped of his citizenship. Those of us who wouldn't even imagine doing such things have nothing to worry about.
 
A man immigrates from the middle east and becomes a Canadian citizen. He then commits terrorist activities which kill innocent people. He should be stripped of his citizenship. Those of us who wouldn't even imagine doing such things have nothing to worry about.

Those of us who participate in civil disobedience will be labeled terrorists, like G20 protesters.
This has very little to do with terrorism
 
A man immigrates from the middle east and becomes a Canadian citizen. He then commits terrorist activities which kill innocent people. He should be stripped of his citizenship. Those of us who wouldn't even imagine doing such things have nothing to worry about.

:thumb:

FAST
 
A man immigrates from the middle east and becomes a Canadian citizen. He then commits terrorist activities which kill innocent people. He should be stripped of his citizenship. Those of us who wouldn't even imagine doing such things have nothing to worry about.

What if a kid born here of Middle Eastern parents commits a terrorist act, should he not be stripped of citizenship? Or a white Canadian born in Ottawa? What if he commits a terrorist act against India? And since when it is OK to discriminate against Canadian citizens based on a place of birth?
 
A man immigrates from the middle east and becomes a Canadian citizen. He then commits terrorist activities which kill innocent people. He should be stripped of his citizenship. Those of us who wouldn't even imagine doing such things have nothing to worry about.

Your example is an awesome one if that dude was actually convicted in a fair and impartial trial in a country where the rule of law is for everyone. Unfortunately what this bill says is that if that dude is convicted in a country like Syria, China or North Korea he'll be stripped of his citizenship. Still think we have nothing to worry about?
 
What if a kid born here of Middle Eastern parents commits a terrorist act, should he not be stripped of citizenship? Or a white Canadian born in Ottawa? What if he commits a terrorist act against India? And since when it is OK to discriminate against Canadian citizens based on a place of birth?

Nailed it! :thumb:
 
This law is nothing but Neo-Con racism. It doesn't apply to most White Canadians especially of the Anglo-Saxon variety
 
Those of us who participate in civil disobedience will be labeled terrorists, like G20 protesters.
This has very little to do with terrorism

So your idea of civil disobedience is smashing private property and publically owned property,...???

Those who did,...should be labelled terrorists,...and suffer the consequences.

You do know some of the ass holes at the G20,...were not even Canadian,...so they should be treated the same as Canadians,...???

FAST
 
What if a kid born here of Middle Eastern parents commits a terrorist act, should he not be stripped of citizenship? Or a white Canadian born in Ottawa? What if he commits a terrorist act against India? And since when it is OK to discriminate against Canadian citizens based on a place of birth?

The law applies to those who are eligible for other citizenship even if they are born in Canada.
 
This law is nothing but Neo-Con racism. It doesn't apply to most White Canadians especially of the Anglo-Saxon variety

Were the hell did you get that absolute bull shit from,...???

FAST
 
Were the hell did you get that absolute bull shit from,...???

FAST

I got it from reading, since this law targets immigrants or those who are born in Canada who are eligible for another citizenship somrwhere else. It does not affect most White Canadians
 
So your idea of civil disobedience is smashing private property and publically owned property,...???

Those who did,...should be labelled terrorists,...and suffer the consequences.

You do know some of the ass holes at the G20,...were not even Canadian,...so they should be treated the same as Canadians,...???

FAST

If you read upon civil dissent, it always gets violent. Private corporations do the most damage upon the citizenry, of course anger will be projected towards their private property. And NO its not terrorism just because someone suddenly decides to change the definition to include those they don't like.
 
Those of us who participate in civil disobedience will be labeled terrorists, like G20 protesters.
This has very little to do with terrorism

This is quite worrying, as the government can expand "terrorism" to fit whatever they well please. Going further, what would happen if you had Canadian assets and the government decided to strip your citizenship on the charge of "terrorism" (without trial of course)? Would they forcefully seize your assets?
 
A man immigrates from the middle east and becomes a Canadian citizen. He then commits terrorist activities which kill innocent people. He should be stripped of his citizenship. Those of us who wouldn't even imagine doing such things have nothing to worry about.
I would rather we convict him and sentence him to prison.
 
What if a kid born here of Middle Eastern parents commits a terrorist act, should he not be stripped of citizenship? Or a white Canadian born in Ottawa? What if he commits a terrorist act against India? And since when it is OK to discriminate against Canadian citizens based on a place of birth?

But he cannot be sent back to anywhere else. So Canada has to keep him. Why should we keep terrorists when we can send them back?

Aside from the fact that this another stupid exercise in pre election "Look at how patriotic I am" grandstanding by Harper, why should we keep terrorists?
 
This is quite worrying, as the government can expand "terrorism" to fit whatever they well please. Going further, what would happen if you had Canadian assets and the government decided to strip your citizenship on the charge of "terrorism" (without trial of course)? Would they forcefully seize your assets?

Worst nightmare scenario. Not really plausible and the courts would flip out and spank Harper (again) and strike down another of his pieces of legislation.
 
This law is nothing but Neo-Con racism. It doesn't apply to most White Canadians especially of the Anglo-Saxon variety

What if a neo Nazi who was born in Glasgow plots to blow up a mosque in Brampton. Would he not also be sent back?
 
Your example is an awesome one if that dude was actually convicted in a fair and impartial trial in a country where the rule of law is for everyone. Unfortunately what this bill says is that if that dude is convicted in a country like Syria, China or North Korea he'll be stripped of his citizenship. Still think we have nothing to worry about?

a0a.jpg