You go read the actual letter, why his concerns mattered and why Barr was misleading about him under testimony just days after he received Mueller's letter!!
Can a sitting president be indicted by the DOJ?
- Thread starter doggystyle99
- Start date
He stepped down as soon as all was revealed and it was game, set and match against him. He definitely would have been indicted if he did not step down. It was the biggest scandal at that time, such that most Republicans wanted to distance themselves from him!!!
ROFLMAO!!! Trying to pin collusion on the transition team talking to, among other countries, Russia is truly moronic. Attempting to build a criminal case on that is downright imbecilic. Oh, btw, Mueller spiked the collusion part right through its heart.
Which quite misrepresents what he himself says about it. If Donny and his Gang had come clean, and put all those suspicions and misgivings to rest, instead of lying, stonewalling and cowering behind Executive Privilege, we'd all be singing a different song.
Say, isn't claiming 'privilege' a thing only self-entitled elites do? Good thing he's a sitting President, 'cause Mueller says the evidence is nothing he can stand on.
The Congressional Democrats don't get a do over. And they will not get one. The DOJ decided go the Special Prosecutor route with the Democrat support. Now, that they don't like the conclusions,they want to do it again. Rightfully so, the administration is telling Nadler go suck wind. The report is in and the House Democrats now have a choice. Start the impeachment process or shut the fuck up. But, if, despite their stated objective-removal of the sitting President- they think that Trump will cooperate in his own hanging, they're truly and completely without a clue.
O
OnTheWayOut
Umm, no. Liberals would just move on to their next attack, rather than admit they were wrong. Liberals do not want to improve the country and work with anyone, their entire focus is how to get rid of Trump ..... after they put forth likely the only candidate he could have beaten. No, it would be the same old song, just a different chorus.
They still haven't read the conclusions.
Barr and Trump are still refusing to release the full Mueller report.
For a meaningless blowjob? LOL....... we are talking about real crimes here. The obstruction is obvious, but the real question is, what crimes is he hiding ? Perhaps not collusion (though he did ask Putin to find Hillary's emails on TV), but there are many other sordid possibilities (financial and/or sexual) and he must be hiding something or why bother obstructing?
ROFLMAO!!! Lying, obstruction and witness tampering. The blow job was the only thing that didn't break any laws.
Aw, poor Phil.
Have I been hurting your feelings too much by pointing out how wrong you are on everything again?
Trump would be in jail with Cohen right now if he wasn't POTUS.
Combine that with obstruction, which 1000 former fed prosecutors say is a slam dunk case based on the Mueller report, and he'd be gone for a while.
Roflmao!!!! If it was even a marginal case, never mind slam dunk, they would be holding a trial in the Senate this week.
You still don't understand the DOJ policy that you can't indict a sitting president, do you?
Its all in the Mueller report.
Once he's out of office.....
It's not even a finished investigation, just as far as a DoJ employee could take it. All we know is there's some evidence of some wrongdoing, and none that explicitly exonerates the President. The rest of the work has to been done by the House, and Donny seems determined to ensure it's never done at all.
We may never know who really did what. Or didn't.
