screwge said:
thanks OTB. I have spent the last little while looking for your previous comments. I found several, but they didn't really address the question I posed. Why do 50% of Americans support Bush. Its not a trick question, or meant to inflame, I'd really like to know. The answer is not obvious, so I was hoping someone could state the positive case (as opposed to he's better than Kerry, although I acknowledge this is a valid response). If 50% support him so vehemently, he must have strong points. I don't see them from this perspective, so I'm hoping to be educated. Thanks to those who reply.
You are right in that there are two answers to this question, why do you like the POTUS and why do you prefer the POTUS to Kerry (the second allows you to consider Kerry negatives - don't out swim the shark just the other guy in the water logic).
Bush supporters are very firm in their support (I just wish there were 10% more of them). For me it comes down to a few things:
I'm generally in favor of his domestic agenda, No Child Left Behind and the Guest Worker programs are EXACTLY what I'd do if the country came to its senses and elected me King. I'm a Reagan Republican that believes in a smaller government that should only invest in certain areas (defense, justice, education...). Bush has actually spent more money than I'm comfortable with. I'm a big fan of his cutting ALL tax rates and increasing the child tax credit. I believe you grow your way out of deficits not tax your way out. Agree or not, these are my reasons.
Now, the big issues of Terrorism and Iraq. And no, I don't link them (note plural). I'm a fan of the Patriot Act, I think we need to use our intelligence and law enforcement capabilities better - having a "Wall" between them is insane. I think the FBI should (with a court order) be able to tap all my phones, not just a single one that they get the order for (if I'm a target of an investigation). I believe AQ is a bigger threat to our country that the FBI, but then I live a pretty clean life ;-)
I thought the invasion of Afghanistan was justified, and with elections recently, has put the country and our security in better shape. Its been reported that we've captured or killed 75% of AQ - not a bad start. While we all know that Karl Rove will drop OBL into the waiting hands of the 101 Airborne in the next week, even if that doesn't happen it will have been a successful campaign so far against AQ.
Iraq is an issue that many disagree with me on, but here is my view. I thought Iraq had WMD, more importantly (given I don't get National Security Briefings - something else we should fix) I believe the POTUS believed it as well. He was wrong - along with everyone else (Kerry, Clinton, Blair - name someone and they were wrong except for Blix). My view is he went for a valid reason and it turned out to be wrong (reading that sentence again I've opened myself up to Peckr and other fools but I'll leave it to them to play with). What can we do from here, finish the job, was it worth it, I would say (and many would again disagree) absolutely - the Iraqi people are better off, the world is better off and tens of thousands of kids aren't dieing every year due to sanctions but we've lost 1k troops - a hard trade but not a bad one.
Now the second question, Bush vs Kerry:
This is a really easy one, Bush knows what he thinks (but has a hard time saying it) and Kerry doesn't (but sounds good telling you what you want to hear). An easy decision for me. Some examples:
Kerry voted against the Iraq war in 1991, then admonished Bush 1 for not going all the way to Baghdad (even though he didn't have the "global test" on his side to do that). He simply doesn't stick with anything, classic slimy Democrat in that he plays the race card (we'll get your votes counted), class card (I drive an SUV, oops I don't, ah, my wife owns them), the envy card (the middle class bla bla bla), the scare card (social security bla bla bal).
He's spent more time talking about his service in Vietnam than he spent there or talking about his 20 years in the Senate (where he accomplished nothing).
At lead Howard Dean believed something and you knew where he stood.
Did I answer your question?
OTB