You really really really need to put your glasses on. See plc below and yeah, Trump would have wanted to grab her by the pussy back then and based on the conviction in court, he did without her consent. .
Breaking!!! - CO Supreme Court strikes Trump from ballot.
- Thread starter mandrill
- Start date
Based on the civil lawsuit which is a different thing squeegee. Why wasnt he thrown in jail for it
That's what rump thinks.
He thinks he now owns the SC and they will do his bidding.
Isn't that weaponizing the legal system?
Anger?? Oh come on, I come here for relaxation and a pass time. I enjoy listening to the nonsense and bullshit. If I were young and starting all over again, I'd be like Luke Beasley with my own YouTube channel going out and interviewing the cultish maga base (Trumpy fans) for the entertainment and a good laugh at their ignorance.
Here is another hilarious example of trump associated degeneracy which came to my attention from a new Netflix movie Bitconned (recommended). Short story is that one of cofounders of “Students for Trump” decided to become a fake lawyer and con people
Meanwhile another cofounder pistol whipped his gf…
Students for Trump - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Yes, women find him irresistible.
What are your redeeming qualities for the sake of comparison?
Yeah sure...seems like you've been brainwashed and can't for a second think outside the box. I can't help you with your denial, sorry.
You constitution has been hijacked by the left, you just can't or won't believe it.
Most democracies let the people decide. You can't have it both ways.
You fear authoritarianism and the demise of democracy yet feel comforted in the fact that the ruling party is hindering someone's ability to run for election.
Not seeing the forest for the trees so to speak.
I provided a link to someone else in this thread. Citation is there if you are brave enough to accept it.
You have so easily bought into the left narrative of the usual doom & gloom tactics, I can't help you sorry. You seem like a smart person yet can't see through the smokescreen and almost-predictable tactics used by the left every time they fear losing an election.
I shared a poll with you earlier and there are many more if you just do a search. (unless your confirmation bias prevents you from doing that)How do you get to "the majority of Americans want him as their president" hmmmm. is it lunacy, delusion, or just a lie you are throwing at us so you can feel like a Trump Cult disciple?
If you just want to ignore it that's fine, but don't accuse people of being delusional and throwing lies.
Because that's what leftists do...they censor, demonize, cancel, and decide who's opinion matters. Or they decide when the conversation ends and promptly stomp out of the room.
You know that right?
Is that why Joe Biden won the 2020 election with over 1000000 votes, is that why in 2022 the Repugs didn't regain the Senate and barely won the house. In other words no big red wave, right??? Face it, once it is official Trump is the opposition , he will never win a general election, you heard it here.
So you don't believe a business has the right to how they want their public image viewed, how they want their brand viewed? What kind of Conservative are you who wants to dictate to business on how they should run their business??
With a fast timetable (for SCOTUS) and just a general "Did Colorado err".
Makes me think they are going to dismiss it on a technicality that lets them dodge any real grappling with the 14th amendment.
My first guess would be the "the 14th can't apply to a primary ballot". Doesn't really resolve anything, but stalls the question and then they can plead "it's all too late" when it comes back in the general.
They could also go with "there was insufficient process" and refuse to actually say what the proper process would be, hoping the lack of clarity acts as a chilling effect on other cases.
Maybe we will get lucky and they will issue some substantial decision, but I doubt it.
Statute of limitations had passed.Based on the civil lawsuit which is a different thing squeegee. Why wasnt he thrown in jail for it
How has it been hijacked?
Applying it to Trump and providing him every legal recourse to challenge it and hopefully have the country come to a consensus about the proper application is "hijacked"?
This really is just " There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect," for you, isn't it?
Absolutely, no democracy can survive a people who are determined to let democracy fall.
Of course, that's rarely what people think they are getting.
The Republicans are the ruling party now?
(You do know that's who filed the Colorado law suit.)
But sure, let's follow your philosophical position as you see it.
Any restriction on eligibility is an infringement of democracy.
If that's what you believe, then you think non citizens of any age can hold office as well, correct?
Also, do you believe in elections?
Since elections have rules and eligibility requirements and you are against those, you can't really support them, can you?
I will ask you the same thing I've been asking Not Getting Younger - is this just "You aren't allowed to restrict Trump" thing or do you have a specific, thought out view on eligibility and rules for elections?
If the latter, what is that view?
To whom?
You posted this in post 323 and have posted no links since then.
You posted a link to 270 to win, which doesn' t have that info and that appears to be the only link you posted.
Maybe you are thinking of another thread?
