Allure Massage

BREAKING: CBC producer quits, slams woke broadcaster for failing to cover issues important to Canadians

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,794
22,885
113
The fact that it continues to be taxpayer funded in the 21st century is the problem.

If people want to run a network that caters to hard-core leftists, that's perfectly fine with me. My Canada includes devout socialists (many of them, in fact 😃).

What I don't understand is why I have to pay for it. In a multi-channel universe, people who want to subscribe to specialty channels should be the ones to pay for them. Not taxpayers.

I don't expect people with different political views to help pay for my sources of news and entertainment. I see no reason why others should expect any different. Given its abysmal ratings, no serious person in the year 2022 believes the CBC contributes anything to Canada's "national identity."

Indeed, many of the complaints about the CBC would disappear if people who have no use for it weren't being forced to pay for it.
Wrong again.
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,058
3,950
113
Right wing spin.

CBC has an ombudsman and if you think there is bias write them a letter and they'll respond to you.
The problem is you're being exposed to ever more right wing media and becoming radicalized while most of Canada is still the same.
The country is still mostly liberal and reelected Trudeau.

The right wing are just getting angrier and more radical.
How do Liberals tell you how to live your life?
1. The cult of climate change. Not everyone agrees with the notion of the end of the world is nigh and that CO2 is the great Satan.

2. They want to outlaw heating your house with natural gas.

3. They want to outlaw or at least tax to oblivion various vehicle types (pickup trucks for example) to the point where they are unaffordable.

4. Hostility toward capitalism and the free market and all the shit that comes from that.

5. Cancel culture. So many examples of outraged social justice warriors wanting to ruin people for simply expressing their opinions. Take for example the backlash against author JK Rowling.

6. Giving away money to special interest groups like it grows on trees. Example 40 billion dollars given to the natives who claim that the welfare system has failed them.

7. Bill C-16 and the limiting of free speech. For example pronouns and forcing the populace to adopt the usage of silly pronouns and prosecuting those who do not agree.

8. Forced accommodation of religious practices. Example, allowing Muslims to have prayer spaces in public schools in Toronto. Public infrastructure should never be for the use of any religious practices.

9. Religious accommodation as a whole.

10. Forcing the Defunding of the police. Just insanity.

I could go on and on, but I don't have enough time.


But don't worry, I think the same thing about Right Wingers. They like to tell you how to live your life too. Just come at you from a different side of the equation. There is scant difference between the 2 sides.

1. Outlaw abortion.

2. Outlaw gay marriage.

3 Force religion into the criminal code.

4. Gun culture and all the stupid shit that comes with that.

5. Control what can be taught in public school based on religious dogma.

6. Do not believe in equality between men and women.

7. Legislating sexual morality

8. Elimination of safe work labour laws.

9. Hostility toward higher education and science and all the shit that comes from that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Fox

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,794
22,885
113
1. The cult of climate change. Not everyone agrees with the notion of the end of the world is nigh and that CO2 is the great Satan.
See, even that first point puts you in a small minority, with more than 3/4's of Canadians believing the scientists and saying something should be done.

You're not in the middle, even if you think you are.
That belief alone makes you stand quite far to the right, since the science deniers are almost universally right wing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,733
6,010
113
Niagara
1. The cult of climate change. Not everyone agrees with the notion of the end of the world is nigh and that CO2 is the great Satan.
Yet it is in fact not illegal to have a bonfire, drive a car, take a plane ride, or fart in the wind. This is not an example of being told how to live your life.

2. They want to outlaw heating your house with natural gas.
It is not illegal to heat your home with any fossil fuel. “They” want a reduction in fossil fuel use to create less pollution. That is not not an example of being told how to live your life.

3. They want to outlaw or at least tax to oblivion various vehicle types (pickup trucks for example) to the point where they are unaffordable.
Again… “They want to” is a stretch. When it happens, we can talk.


4. Hostility toward capitalism and the free market and all the shit that comes from that.
Not hostility toward Capitalism at all. Hostility towards corruption of Capitalism. Capitalism in its purest form, nobody could argue with. Somebody produces something that people need, and sells it in a free market. Fucking awesome. A guys owns a bank, and lends out his money… if he does well, he can buy a vacation home. If he does poor, he can lose his own home. What a great system.

Yet today the guys running the bank do not own it. It is not their money. They can run it into the ground, and still make a massive bonus. (And somebody else will inevitably lose their home).

And somehow it became perfectly legal for a venture Capitalist to buy my dads old factory and take all the pension money for himself.

If that is the Capitalism you are defending, then we see the world different. Again, nobody’s opinion on socialism is stopping you from doing anything in life. You are free to live your life as you see fit even if tree huggers exist.

Besides, Capitalism ended when we adopted the concept of Central Banks.

5. Cancel culture. So many examples of outraged social justice warriors wanting to ruin people for simply expressing their opinions. Take for example the backlash against author JK Rowling.
There was backlash against a statement she made…. That is true. Did she have to change the way she lived her life? Oh…. But book sales. Is that not the free market? Or can I not buy a copy of Harry Potter on Amazon? Let me check…. No, it’s there.

6. Giving away money to special interest groups like it grows on trees. Example 40 billion dollars given to the natives who claim that the welfare system has failed them.
Neither Liberal nor Conservative. More of a legal matter. Again, does it stop you from buying tea in China? No. Not liking something is different than being told you can’t do something else.

7. Bill C-16 and the limiting of free speech. For example pronouns and forcing the populace to adopt the usage of silly pronouns and prosecuting those who do not agree.
This one I agree with you on. The Gov’t is forcing you to do something. Does it change your life? Not really…

However…. Be careful what you wish for. I know it sounds reasonable that Dr Jordan Peterson champions the fact that he should have the freedom to decide whether to call someone Mr or Mrs. If he goes to court, does he have a choice in how he addresses the Judge? “Your Honour”. Or can he call a male Judge “bitch”? I mean rights and everything. Why should he, or anyone be forced to show some basic respect?

It must be a real hardship on you have to refer to people as “he” or “she”. Mind you, I suppose I could refer to you as “Ms Snowflake”. ??? (Of course that is ridiculous. I don’t have the right to pick peoples titles, sir names, or honours, whether I agree with monarchy existing or not)

8. Forced accommodation of religious practices. Example, allowing Muslims to have prayer spaces in public schools in Toronto. Public infrastructure should never be for the use of any religious practices.
Has no baring on you. Nobody is making you pray in a public space. It does not affect how you live your life.

Not liking something (which you have every right) is different than being told how to live your life.

9. Religious accommodation as a whole.
10. Forcing the Defunding of the police. Just insanity.
What police departments have actually been defunded?

Most of this list you provided is not your life being affected at all. If you don’t green technology, then don’t buy it. If you do not want to pray to a higher power… then don’t.
However, stopping me from praying, or investing in new technology is just you doing what you accuse Liberals of doing.

As for the Socialism vs Capitalism concepts. That is the cost of democracy. Obscene ceo pay, the theft of wages, pensions, a perverse risk reward system, and friendly politicians who will craft laws in exchange for funding and a good job out of politics has been forced upon some of us who don’t like it. That is neither right left. Right and Left at its core are Small Gov’t and little Spending vs More oversight and higher investment in government institutions. All the rest is hype. Jesus was not in a political party. That was Buddha.
 
Last edited:

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,575
3,162
113
Yet it is in fact not illegal to have a bonfire, drive a car, take a plane ride, or fart in the wind. This is not an example of being told how to live your life.
Yet the lonnies just do all possible to curtail production and make energy more expensive

so they do not explicitly tell me ho to live , just make it more difficult

It is not illegal to heat your home with any fossil fuel. “They” want a reduction in fossil fuel use to create less pollution. That is not not an example of being told how to live your life.
so they do not explicitly tell me how to live , just make it more difficult

Again… “They want to” is a stretch. When it happens, we can talk.
Talk after the fact??
Talk after lives have been destroyed ?
Talk after decades of promoting AGW Bullshit as if it were unquestionable?
NO !
What is wrong with you?
 
Last edited:

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,733
6,010
113
Niagara
Yet the lonnies just do all possible to curtail production and make energy more expensive

so they do not explicitly tell me ho to live , just make it more difficult



so they do not explicitly tell me ho to live , just make it more difficult


Talk after the fact??
Talk after lives have been destroyed ?
Talk after decades of promoting AGW Bullshit as if it were unquestionable?
NO !
What is wrong with you?
Guess the families that get their homes and lives destroyed with climate change and worsening weather disasters mean nothing to you…. And before you tell me that’s bullshit too… as told to you, over and over…. The oil companies already admitted the climate science was correct in court.

What is wrong with you? You can’t even accept the the oil companies admit the science is right when it’s in court documents. Absolutely irrefutable. Yet you can’t accept it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,733
6,010
113
Niagara
Yet the lonnies just do all possible to curtail production and make energy more expensive

so they do not explicitly tell me ho to live , just make it more difficult



so they do not explicitly tell me ho to live , just make it more difficult


Talk after the fact??
Talk after lives have been destroyed ?
Talk after decades of promoting AGW Bullshit as if it were unquestionable?
NO !
What is wrong with you?

And it’s not the left making it more expensive. It’s the right. The network of donors the Koch’s organized, has gotten bigger, more influential, and more global. When the GOP held power we had so much oil being pumped we did not have enough places to store it…. And when the Dems took over, we suddenly had to tap into emergency supply. You do the math.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,575
3,162
113
And it’s not the left making it more expensive. It’s the right.
That is ridiculous

Justins carbon tax is not a right wing idea- its intended purpose is to make gasoline more expensive - ask Gerald
Justin's Clean Fuel Standard (translate - a different tax) is not a right wing idea- its intended purpose is to make gasoline more expensive - ask Gerald

The network of donors the Koch’s organized, has gotten bigger, more influential, and more global. When the GOP held power we had so much oil being pumped we did not have enough places to store it…. And when the Dems took over, we suddenly had to tap into emergency supply. You do the math.
Basic supply and demand
Joe Biden told the oil industry the long term plan is to shut them down , no drilling on Federal land and no pipelines ....... so they stopped drilling
You figure it out


This is another unbelievably aggravating left wing trait
1. Demand change
2. Make change in a panic - ready, shoot aim
3. Blame someone else when it turns to shit

pathetic
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,603
7,540
113
If its basic supply and demand then there should be no problem cutting the $18 billion a year in oil subsidies Canada hands out.
But then what will happen to the Oil Companies CEOs millions in bonuses if there are no subsidies? After all they may have to lose millions from their own personal wallets, and Canada cannot afford to see them suffer, and so the middle class and those on lowest incomes should be able to sacrifice their incomes to compensate for it!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,575
3,162
113
Guess the families that get their homes and lives destroyed with climate change and worsening weather disasters mean nothing to you…. And before you tell me that’s bullshit too… as told to you, over and over…. The oil companies already admitted the climate science was correct in court.

What is wrong with you? You can’t even accept the the oil companies admit the science is right when it’s in court documents. Absolutely irrefutable. Yet you can’t accept it.
Science is not determined by by a court or the executive of any company

so yes your pseudo science is refutable

zero net warming over a thirty year period despite ever increasing miniscule CO2 levels is however not irrefutable.

Why do you believe in the AGW farce?
Because the CBC told you so and you are incapable of independent thought and are unable to understand that a trace gas measured in parts per million is not able to heat up a planet

worsening weather disasters
This is just plain wrong as hurricanes' , tornadoes and even wild fires have not increased in frequency or intensity
again the false narrative of the left media on display

Case in point is the BC flood .... of a flood plain at the foot of mountains with rivers running down the mountains, an area which has flooded before and will flood again
But the CBC told you it is due to climate change and you accepted this without question

Galileo spent the last years of his life under house arrest because he correctly believe the earth revolved around the sun
Thinking a court gets to determine a scientific question is absurd and just plain wrong

Just as wrong as your absurd (absolutely ridiculous ) thinking the right right makes oil more expensive
There is a pattern to your absurd conclusions
 
Last edited:

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,733
6,010
113
Niagara
Science is not determined by by a court or the executive of any company

so yes your pseudo science is refutable

zero net warming over a thirty year period despite ever increasing miniscule CO2 levels is however not irrefutable.

Why do you believe in the AGW farce?
Because the CBC told you so and you are incapable of independent thought and are unable to understand that a trace gas measured in parts per million is not able to heat up a planet


This is just plain wrong as hurricanes' , tornadoes and even wild fires have not increased in frequency or intensity
again the false narrative of the left media on display

Galileo spent the last years of his life under house arrest because he correctly believe the earth revolved around the sun
Thinking a court gets to determine a scientific question is absurd and just plain wrong

Lies.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,794
22,885
113
Science is not determined by by a court or the executive of any company
But you also refuse to accept the word of:
IPCC
NASA
AAAS
Scientists at Exxon and Shell

You only quote retired geography profs and those funded by the Koch brothers.
 

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
19,045
5,430
113
Lewiston, NY
Probably a Karen looking for their 15 minutes.
Not a name I recognize at all, and I listen to CBC all the time and sometimes even listen to the production credits. I'll have to check the website...
 

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,733
6,010
113
Niagara
??? WTF ????

another loathsome and despicable trait of the left
when confronted with cold hard facts, they pretend they do not exist
Who is the denier now?

The frequency of stronger hurricanes has intensified.

The magnitude of Californias wildfires have intensified.

Those are cold hard facts. Go do your tap dance routine where someone appreciates a good whopper.

And for the record, it was not the courts the decided climate science was real, as you so often spin it. It was the oil companies lawyers stating their own scientists agreed with Climate models. The Judge very wisely gave each oil companies attorney an opportunity to disagree or dispute. Non did.


So…. That would make you the denier. Why do you lie and say the courts made that decision when you know it’s not true?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,794
22,885
113
The frequency of stronger hurricanes has intensified.

The magnitude of Californias wildfires have intensified.

Those are cold hard facts. Go do your tap dance routine where someone appreciates a good whopper.

And for the record, it was not the courts the decided climate science was real, as you so often spin it. It was the oil companies lawyers stating their own scientists agreed with Climate models. The Judge very wisely gave each oil companies attorney an opportunity to disagree or dispute. Non did.


So…. That would make you the denier. Why do you lie and say the courts made that decision when you know it’s not true?
This is today's ridiculous climate change news.
Extreme Heat Killed Hundreds of Magellanic Penguins on a Single Day in 2019
Scores of penguins died of dehydration in a desperate attempt to reach the nearby ocean amid triple-digit temperatures in Punta Tomba, Argentina.


larue is like moviefan, a science denier who will not accept any evidence that contradicts his confirmation bias.
Its a religious like faith, totally anti-science.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,575
3,162
113
The frequency of stronger hurricanes has intensified.
wrong again




The magnitude of Californias wildfires have intensified.
wrong again





Those are cold hard facts. Go do your tap dance routine where someone appreciates a good whopper.
your cold hard facts are melting

And for the record, it was not the courts the decided climate science was real, as you so often spin it. It was the oil companies lawyers stating their own scientists agreed with Climate models. The Judge very wisely gave each oil companies attorney an opportunity to disagree or dispute. Non did.
WTF ??

What part of courts / opinion do not decide science do you not understand ?
what part of not net warming for 30 years do you not understand ?


So…. That would make you the denier. Why do you lie and say the courts made that decision when you know it’s not true?

You have a chance to apologize for calling me a lair
Get this straight the science does not support the AGW
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts