Black Lives Matter says Dems are 'party of hypocrites' for 'installing' Harris sans 'public voting process'

[Butler1000]

Do you deny that his State of the Union address was pretty good?

One teleprompter speech does not mean anything. It's called sunsetting. Good day/bad days that lead to far more bad days. It's progressive. It started a year ago to get bad. That's why he wasn't doing public appearances.

Look at him now. It took almost a week after the resignation just to address the nation. And it wasn't live. It had to be taped. And he sounded bad then.

Just admit that he isn't up to it and move on.

 

[Butler1000]

Why do you give Trump a pass?????

I don't. Feel free to criticize him at your leisure. I will never say not to. Start threads, post commentary, whatever you like. As long as it's truthful it deserves to be heard.

I have never said Trump is without fault. Here I will do it again. He did a shitty job at the recent Black Journalist thing. Could have easily taken a different tack on a few things.

Explained his point wrong and didn't help him at all.

See, easy peasy.

 

[Butler1000]

What's funny is Kamala chose to avoid the Black journalist thing for a no question stump speech in front of a bunch of Sorority ladies.

When will she sit down with a neutral press and answer tough questions on policy?

 

[Frankfooter]

Name calling is about all the Dems have left these days after 4 years of failure and hiding their leader's mental state from the public.
Desperate & immature...but we all knew that already.

Name calling?

You back a cult that is lead by a rapist and felon. You defend rape, fraud, apartheid and genocide.
Your activities identify you as a troll.

Those are all just facts, skoob.

 

[wigglee]

I don't. Feel free to criticize him at your leisure. I will never say not to. Start threads, post commentary, whatever you like. As long as it's truthful it deserves to be heard.

I have never said Trump is without fault. Here I will do it again. He did a shitty job at the recent Black Journalist thing. Could have easily taken a different tack on a few things.

Explained his point wrong and didn't help him at all.

See, easy peasy.

Here's an easy conclusion. There are only 2 parties with a chance. You devote 99% of you posts to criticizing Democrats, so in effect, you are really promoting Drumpf and the Repugs.

 

[Butler1000]

Here's an easy conclusion. There are only 2 parties with a chance. You devote 99% of you posts to criticizing Democrats, so in effect, you are really promoting Drumpf and the Repugs.

Or.....I think BOTH parties are corrupt. But there is a tendency to white knight the Dems when they don't deserve it. So I simply point it out.

I mean, really, do you think there is a deficiency of threads and posts showing the Flaws of Trump? He is such an easy target why bother? However I said a long time ago Biden was losing it. And watched as everyone said he wasn't. "Oh it's his stutter". "Oh there is nothing wrong".

There was, wasn't there? Big time. And in fact there still is. A man who shouldn't be allowed to work a stove in the President. And the Dems allowing this to occur, trying to run him, and now continuing to allow him to stay, is by far the biggest and most dangerous lie told the American people in a long time. As dangerous as any false flag war ever created.

And that needs to be said as well

 

[Valcazar]

What's funny is Kamala chose to avoid the Black journalist thing for a no question stump speech in front of a bunch of Sorority ladies.

When will she sit down with a neutral press and answer tough questions on policy?

She's expected to do a different NABJ event later this year.

 

[Butler1000]

She's expected to do a different NABJ event later this year.

How about one without cheerleaders?

 

[Valcazar]

How about one without cheerleaders?

I don't even know what that is supposed to mean.
You complained she didn't do the event with Trump and I pointed out she is supposed to do one.
(The NABJ invites both major party candidates every election year. I know Trump didn't bother the last two times and I don't know what the track record over all is for people accepting.)

If you think the NABJ is nothing but "cheerleaders" for her, then that's your issue.

Which professional journalism organization do you think should extend an invite to her, then?
Do any of the others have a long-standing tradition of inviting both candidates like that?
(They might, I don't know. It wouldn't shock me.)

 

[Butler1000]

I don't even know what that is supposed to mean.
You complained she didn't do the event with Trump and I pointed out she is supposed to do one.
(The NABJ invites both major party candidates every election year. I know Trump didn't bother the last two times and I don't know what the track record over all is for people accepting.)

If you think the NABJ is nothing but "cheerleaders" for her, then that's your issue.

Which professional journalism organization do you think should extend an invite to her, then?
Do any of the others have a long-standing tradition of inviting both candidates like that?
(They might, I don't know. It wouldn't shock me.)

I said "NEUTRAL". The NABJ, in this case, can hardly be called anything but biased.

 

[Valcazar]

I said "NEUTRAL". The NABJ, in this case, can hardly be called anything but biased.

Why?
If you are going to argue that all professional organizations are biased, then there is no neutral to be had.

How are you going to identify a neutral organization?

And again, which professional organization of journalists are you proposing?

I'd be fine if the SPJ invited both candidates to be talked to, but as far as i know they don't have this standing invite set up.

 

[Butler1000]

Why?
If you are going to argue that all professional organizations are biased, then there is no neutral to be had.

How are you going to identify a neutral organization?

And again, which professional organization of journalists are you proposing?

I'd be fine if the SPJ invited both candidates to be talked to, but as far as i know they don't have this standing invite set up.

I would be surprised at this point if Harris just does a real press scrum without a teleprompter.

 

[Valcazar]

I would be surprised at this point if Harris just does a real press scrum without a teleprompter.

What do you consider a "real press scrum"?

Do Trump's old "chopper talks" count?

 

[Butler1000]

What do you consider a "real press scrum"?

Do Trump's old "chopper talks" count?

How about, 90 minutes, a pool of reporters from various outlets, similar to the WH press corps.

And as well it's time she did some no teleprompter TV spots, with tougher questioning. There is limited time. And she hasn't done anything close.

 

[Valcazar]

How about, 90 minutes, a pool of reporters from various outlets, similar to the WH press corps.

Obviously you would want good reporters, not the shitshow that is the White House Press Corps, but I've always said I would love to see things more like the old French show that had panels of journalists from different ideologiocal media for a couple of hours.

Of course, how would you get Trump to agree to that?
Actually, has any campaign ever done an event like that?

And as well it's time she did some no teleprompter TV spots, with tougher questioning. There is limited time. And she hasn't done anything close.

It's been 12 days.

 

[Butler1000]

Obviously you would want good reporters, not the shitshow that is the White House Press Corps, but I've always said I would love to see things more like the old French show that had panels of journalists from different ideologiocal media for a couple of hours.

Of course, how would you get Trump to agree to that?
Actually, has any campaign ever done an event like that?



It's been 12 days.

She has had time to go talk to sororities.......

How long does it take to call a press conference and do 90 minutes? It's not like the press will say no. She has the entire Biden campaign team now, the WH team, at her disposal. She could say where and when and just do it. Programming would be pre-empted like that. And it would be viral immediately.

My belief, she is being managed and not allowed. Doesn't bode well.

 

[y2kmark]

Or.....I think BOTH parties are corrupt. But there is a tendency to white knight the Dems when they don't deserve it. So I simply point it out.

I mean, really, do you think there is a deficiency of threads and posts showing the Flaws of Trump? He is such an easy target why bother? However I said a long time ago Biden was losing it. And watched as everyone said he wasn't. "Oh it's his stutter". "Oh there is nothing wrong".

There was, wasn't there? Big time. And in fact there still is. A man who shouldn't be allowed to work a stove in the President. And the Dems allowing this to occur, trying to run him, and now continuing to allow him to stay, is by far the biggest and most dangerous lie told the American people in a long time. As dangerous as any false flag war ever created.

And that needs to be said as well

Both parties have corruption, but only Repugs have let it take control. I'd rather deprive Cheeto of his freedom than give up my own. Tried that religious propaganda for some of my mis spent youth and it sucked. Trump's a shill for the American Taliban...

 

[y2kmark]

She has had time to go talk to sororities.......

How long does it take to call a press conference and do 90 minutes? It's not like the press will say no. She has the entire Biden campaign team now, the WH team, at her disposal. She could say where and when and just do it. Programming would be pre-empted like that. And it would be viral immediately.

My belief, she is being managed and not allowed. Doesn't bode well.

She did a bunch of book signings, but few righties read anything outside the echo chamber...

 

[y2kmark]

How about, 90 minutes, a pool of reporters from various outlets, similar to the WH press corps.

And as well it's time she did some no teleprompter TV spots, with tougher questioning. There is limited time. And she hasn't done anything close.

Sounds like the top of your list would be a debate. What's the defense for Farticus chickening out...

 

[Butler1000]

She did a bunch of book signings, but few righties read anything outside the echo chamber...

As I said, it is now a requirement to BUY her platform?

Welcome to 2024. It's a visual medium world, with a 24 hour news cycle. And she is a political weather vane.