I am not getting busted in real or imaginary raids so I am all good.Yes that is the party line, that agencies are not advertising sex services. Good luck with that one, when undercover after undercover cop testifies in court about the very experiences we are reading about each and every day here on terb.
How are clients collateral? Because the focus won't be on them, even if the law purports to be. It is way too difficult to "track" a client right into the hotel room or condo. He might get caught in a sting, but that's not what they're going for.
How will the sp get hit? Well, duh, do you think she will be able to say that she just happened to be in the room, by coincidence, with her photo, stats, sexy description etc. on the agency's website?
Look, this law may not stick, I personally think it is not sufficiently different than the previous law that was substantially struck, and I think I am right on that. But that doesn't mean the police aren't preparing a raid: don't shoot the messenger, ignore the message, if you prefer.
Agreed. Original post adds nothing that wasn't already discussed to death pre-C36, speculation aside.The fact that you are not even aware that an SP will not be arrested for selling sex just furthers my opinions on your education level regarding the law. I will stick to what actual police and lawyers have told me and many many many others who actually cared to find out the truth.
I added my two cents in the comments section.I'm sure Joy Smith (prominent REFORM PARTY MEMBER) totally agrees with you and is reveling in the fact that clients and agency owners have yet to be unjustly charged, whatever dude. Voting the Reformers back in will only make it worse.
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/joy-smith-mp/sex-trafficking-trudeau_b_6445614.html
Amazing how many comments are blasting Joy LeatherFace Smith and the Reformers.I added my two cents in the comments section.
Is that guess based on anything but fear?My guess is that the police in Toronto are planning, perhaps presently working on, busting an escort agency.
Very likely not.Is that guess based on anything but fear?
You've got that right.The only thing that has changed is the increased fear mongering and the occasional attempts by idiots trying to scare business away from good people.
This is the opposite of what a friend I have who also manages an incall service says has happened since the passing of the bill. Very interesting - who is right/wrong? There is likely no right answer.A lady I know very well manages an Incall location which offers only one person on site at a time. She says that since the Bill passed, she has become crazy busy, and Is in fact scouting out a second building in a slightly different area, to be starting up soon. Business appears to be booming
well i would not bet on that... i suspect something is in the works. however as i don't use incalls and will only be seeing ladies i know or who have good reputations or good referals i will be carrying on all be carefullyAs I said from the beginning, Nothing's going to change. For the time being its Status quo !!
These are exactly the people who should be charged. I don't think anyone has a problem with LE targeting someone like this. Too bad C-36 throws the baby out with the bathwater :frusty: :frusty::frusty::frusty:
Us single guys don't exactly have nothing to lose..all you single guys with nothing to lose keep us married guys posted if theres any stings or busts. we're waiting to dive back in. lol
Exactly- I worked at an upscale spa that was "busted". It has always been illegal to see even an independent in a hotel or condo (for the provider AND the client). Common bawdy house laws have always been selectively enforced.. Escort agencies and MPs were already illegal under the old laws, yet people seem to have forgotten this.
Exactly!The only thing that has changed is the increased fear mongering and the occasional attempts by idiots trying to scare business away from good people.
As more time passes, this looks to be more the case. It was difficult to know that for sure right from the get go, however. I'm still wary that, at some point, police will bust someone just to show that see, we're enforcing the law.I see that as more time passes people see , as I said before , the laws will be selectively enforced on specific problem situations.
Probably true, but as others have said - it seems likely they will go for the low hanging fruit, as it were.As more time passes, this looks to be more the case. It was difficult to know that for sure right from the get go, however. I'm still wary that, at some point, police will bust someone just to show that see, we're enforcing the law.