Well, I guess I am being even more frugal than our wise Einer. I would have zero interest in having a gal watch unless I was given a steep discount like maybe the typical $200/hr for $100 or something. Maybe its different with us old geezers vs young studs but just doesn't have any appeal to me. It wouldn't even when I was a young guy.
I would think the internship would be much more important for massage gals where there is actually some technique involved - especially to give some good massage and some of the more sensual stuff that is more than grabbing, sucking, bouncing and pulling. Seems far more inolved that what might happen during the companionship session if has friends choose to have sex. Sex in my humble view doesn't take nearly the talent as more sensual intimacy.
I recall many skilled massage gals over the years, decades at Allure, SRM etc.
I will now jump in a foxhole and duck for those that may disagree
I think Einar is 100% correct - there's probably a few guys who would be willing to pay another girl a "watcher fee" - how many couples bring a woman into the relationship and the girl watches? I'm sure they exist. So there's definitely some who'd be up for it.
But I'm like you Dave in that I wouldn't pay a dime for the privilege of being watched (I'm thinking I would do it at no charge). And Dave is also correct - on some level, since you are doing a favor, perhaps the client should be compensated? It's one thing to have an interactive duo - another thing to have someone watch.
I think I saw an MP once advertise training sessions where you paid the normal rate for two girls with the 2nd girl being a new trainee. I'm guessing there would be a lot of talking/training and you are more a subject versus a client.
This happens on a frequent basis at MPs, including having the "watcher" do a little more than just watching. And yes, the client generally isn't required to pay for the watcher's time, though the MP may otherwise compensate her...I'm not privy to that info and have never inquired.
If she's looking to be paid to watch, that's pretty iffy. Probably some men who would agree to that, but it seems like a having your cake and eating it too situation to me.
Yes it happens at MP's. But I find it a little nutty to ask if someone can watch you AND you pay her something when you are doing her the favor.
I also think a duo is NOT the best idea for training a new SP (IMO). At the end of the day, plenty of porn available to get an idea of what an interaction is like (ignoring the obvious fakery). I'm thinking the stuff that cannot be taught or cannot be seen in porn is the wave of emotions including meeting someone new, establishing a quick enough connection to be able to provide services, repeating, and all the unknowns (will he pay, will he be abusive, will he be hygienic, etc.). Sadly I think all these only come with time/experience. The other problem with a duo (or even a watching session) is that is not standard. How often will there be another woman there with you? Most of the time it's you and a perfect stranger, unless it's a repeat client.
The usual suggestion is start at an MP. A little safer environment with similar conditions - meeting a few clients per shift, quick connection, etc. plus a little more freedom when it comes to choosing what you will or will not do.
BTW, my reference to porn is simply about watching two people having sex. Clearly the first and last 5-10 min are unique but everything in between is basically two people having sex, which can be seen in porn.