Bangladeshi Islamists attack minority hindu population, burn houses, kidnap women as the country descends into unholy madness

[shack]

1: But it's Hamas that is trying for genocide, this I've proved to you over and over again, but you are either consumed with too much hate to see it, or you are just retarded.
2: Huh, whatever
3: Source, trust me brah, even Al fucking Jizera and the Gaza ministry of health says you are wrong.

Israel-Gaza war in maps and charts: Live tracker

The latest death toll stands at 44,630 Palestinians and 1,139 people killed in Israel since October 7, 2023.

www.aljazeera.com

Here are the latest casualty figures as of 1:00pm in Gaza (10:00 GMT) on October 13:

• Killed: at least 42,227 people,

But I am sure you will continue to quote some non peer reviewed letter to the editor because truth and reality means nothing to you. It's all about your 2 minutes of hate.
4: You mean how Israel is taking extraordinary efforts to avoid civilian deaths and those measures Hamas keeps trying to nerf?

Even if everything you said was 100% legit, it does NOTHING to counter the claims made against you and your ilk by Leimonis, thus proving him right.

I've already established over and over again that you support Palestine because you have a murderous genocidal hatred of Jews. Surely you must see that your hate campaign is not working on anyone but a few fellow travelers, surely you must see that you are getting your ass handed to you over and over and if anything you are doing harm to your cause. Or are you another Mitchell.

Great post Not. Every word is 100% accurate. Every comma is perfectly placed.

One slight criticism, though. Although Mitch has some flaws, I think that you are hitting below the belt by comparing Geno the Hateful to him. I feel that he is well intentioned, yet meanwhile Geno the Vile is hate, incarnate. I never knew that someone as evil as he could possibly exist. Live and learn.

 

[Frankfooter]

You are as blind as Bart in that pic. The only difference is that, unlike you, he was not blinded by hate.

You really can't see what you've become.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1845616564852392369

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1845610422008766856

 

[Frankfooter]

That's because the Lancet made absolutely ZERO estimates.

You have come up empty each of the dozens of times I've asked you to provide a quote that is attributable to any representative of The Lancet where they voice any opinion or vouch for any part of that letter sent to the editor of the study conducted by Muslim scientists.

This is another example of a willful lie on your part for the sole purpose of demonizing Israel. That is known as hate speech and you are using TERB as your platform with which to conduct an illegal activity.

Why would anyone believe a racial supremacist declaring that his movement isn't really killing that many people?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1838523608718807052

 

[shack]

Why would anyone believe a racial supremacist declaring that his movement isn't really killing that many people?

Why would anyone claim that a peer review journal of laboratory scientific studies would comment on a geopilitical situation that is totally out of their realm of expertise?

Your whole premise is unworthy of consideration. It's preposterous. Yet it's the strongest argument that you feel that you have at your disposal.

You have proven how weak your case is.

 

[Frankfooter]

Why would anyone claim that a peer review journal of laboratory scientific studies would comment on a geopilitical situation that is totally out of their realm of expertise?

Your whole premise is unworthy of consideration. It's preposterous. Yet it's the strongest argument that you feel that you have at your disposal.

You have proven how weak your case is.

Why would anyone believe a genocidal racial supremacist over the most trusted medical journal on the planet?
Stick to your area of expertise, accusing people of lying and defending killing children.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1845490523370377282

 

[NotADcotor]

Great post Not. Every word is 100% accurate. Every comma is perfectly placed.

One slight criticism, though. Although Mitch has some flaws, I think that you are hitting below the belt by comparing Geno the Hateful to him. I feel that he is well intentioned, yet meanwhile Geno the Vile is hate, incarnate. I never knew that someone as evil as he could possibly exist. Live and learn.

I meant specifically in that last part. Mitchell keeps posting stuff seeing it disproved and does he acknowledge it, does he fact check with a bit more rigor? No he just continues on as if he is winning, even laughing when his sources are wrong. I never meant to imply that Mitchell was shilling for pure evil, I mean Trump is a horrid psychopath and a danger to the republic and global order, but he isn't a genocidal maniac.
The one big difference is that I have no idea if Mitchell is well intentioned or if he is trolling in the original sense of the word. If he was well intentioned when pointed out that his sources are wrong, he would retract, but that's expecting too much from the political section I guess. Some of the stuff he does strongly suggests the latter.. I am 100% sure that Frankie and pals are true believers and not just trying to take the piss or "pawn the libs" or whatever the kids say these days.

I wonder if Frankfooter is a minion of Justin Beiber, he could very well be. Seems like the type of guy who would put pineapple on a pizza and then go on to claim it's just a cheese and pep. That's pretty evil

 

[Frankfooter]

I wonder if Frankfooter is a minion of Justin Beiber, he could very well be. Seems like the type of guy who would put pineapple on a pizza and then go on to claim it's just a cheese and pep. That's pretty evil

evil?
17,000 children killed, likely a 100,000 more crippled or orphaned.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1845580573235929191

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1845477797172584726

 

[NotADcotor]

Why would anyone claim that a peer review journal of laboratory scientific studies would comment on a geopilitical situation that is totally out of their realm of expertise?

Your whole premise is unworthy of consideration. It's preposterous. Yet it's the strongest argument that you feel that you have at your disposal.

You have proven how weak your case is.

I haven't shown ignored content today, if he STILL going on about that fucking Lancet article. The one that is not in line with the Gaza ministry of whatever from an Al Jezzera article?
The one that he has been informed using links to Lancet itself and even cut and pastes was just a letter to the editor and in no way reflects Lancet position. Please tell me he isn't still on about that.

I do wonder sometimes, does he actually read what other people say or does he just look for key words and cuts and pastes some bullshit. It does seem like the latter. I know if I wanted to convince people of a cause of something worthy, like the hotness of Kate Micucci or how Twice is better than Girls Generation or how music reached perfection with Steel Panther and someone pointed out that my information has a factual error as opposed to an opinion difference, I'd retract and pick another angle. If someone is going to be convincing they should have their game tight. When I post in response to him I actually give citations from actual sources, with links and cut and paste so someone can actually look it up. Sadly often when Frankfooter posts something from twitter and they do the same, what they claim it says and what it actually says isn't the same thing, like with that Lancet thing.

I donno man, if I were Hamas I think I'd want someone better to do my shilling, or maybe he knows his position has no actual merit and is indefensible to anyone not consumed with a genocidal rage towards Jews so he has to resort to the intellectual equivalent of throwing shit at a wall and seeing what sticks, or saying nothing at all, and he doesn't realize how much damage he is doing to his cause and his own rep with the shit method.

 

[shack]

Why would anyone believe a genocidal racial supremacist over the most trusted medical journal on the planet?

The Lancet is out of their element when it comes to war.

That's why The Lancet has not uttered a single word regarding that study and as such there is nothing from them to believe or misbelieve.

We DO know that we can disbelieve everything that you post as you've just verified.

 

[shack]

I haven't shown ignored content today, if he STILL going on about that fucking Lancet article. The one that is not in line with the Gaza ministry of whatever from an Al Jezzera article?
The one that he has been informed using links to Lancet itself and even cut and pastes was just a letter to the editor and in no way reflects Lancet position. Please tell me he isn't still on about that.

I do wonder sometimes, does he actually read what other people say or does he just look for key words and cuts and pastes some bullshit. It does seem like the latter. I know if I wanted to convince people of a cause of something worthy, like the hotness of Kate Micucci or how Twice is better than Girls Generation or how music reached perfection with Steel Panther and someone pointed out that my information has a factual error as opposed to an opinion difference, I'd retract and pick another angle. If someone is going to be convincing they should have their game tight. When I post in response to him I actually give citations from actual sources, with links and cut and paste so someone can actually look it up. Sadly often when Frankfooter posts something from twitter and they do the same, what they claim it says and what it actually says isn't the same thing, like with that Lancet thing.

I donno man, if I were Hamas I think I'd want someone better to do my shilling, or maybe he knows his position has no actual merit and is indefensible to anyone not consumed with a genocidal rage towards Jews so he has to resort to the intellectual equivalent of throwing shit at a wall and seeing what sticks, or saying nothing at all, and he doesn't realize how much damage he is doing to his cause and his own rep with the shit method.

Too many things, that are valid, to address. Who knows what goes on in the mind of a psychopath like Geno? He clearly has anger and psychological issues.

 

[Frankfooter]

The Lancet is out of their element when it comes to war.

That's why The Lancet has not uttered a single word regarding that study and as such there is nothing from them to believe or misbelieve.

We DO know that we can disbelieve everything that you post as you've just verified.

Just shut up about the Lancet, Shazi.
You are an old and ignorant racist trying to slam the most trusted medical journal in the world for reporting on your genocide.

Just like Israel has killed the most journalists in war, ever. Because they are trying to hide the genocide from the world.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1845581647665660346

 

[Frankfooter]

I haven't shown ignored content today, if he STILL going on about that fucking Lancet article. The one that is not in line with the Gaza ministry of whatever from an Al Jezzera article?
The one that he has been informed using links to Lancet itself and even cut and pastes was just a letter to the editor and in no way reflects Lancet position. Please tell me he isn't still on about that.

I do wonder sometimes, does he actually read what other people say or does he just look for key words and cuts and pastes some bullshit. It does seem like the latter. I know if I wanted to convince people of a cause of something worthy, like the hotness of Kate Micucci or how Twice is better than Girls Generation or how music reached perfection with Steel Panther and someone pointed out that my information has a factual error as opposed to an opinion difference, I'd retract and pick another angle. If someone is going to be convincing they should have their game tight. When I post in response to him I actually give citations from actual sources, with links and cut and paste so someone can actually look it up. Sadly often when Frankfooter posts something from twitter and they do the same, what they claim it says and what it actually says isn't the same thing, like with that Lancet thing.

I donno man, if I were Hamas I think I'd want someone better to do my shilling, or maybe he knows his position has no actual merit and is indefensible to anyone not consumed with a genocidal rage towards Jews so he has to resort to the intellectual equivalent of throwing shit at a wall and seeing what sticks, or saying nothing at all, and he doesn't realize how much damage he is doing to his cause and his own rep with the shit method.

You ran away after I nailed you in your posts. Typical cowardly zionist.
Stick to defending killing children or burning refugees sheltering in tents in the courtyard of a hospital.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1845606622111916429

 

[shack]

Just shut up about the Lancet, Shazi.

When all you can respond with is shut up, you're admitting you've been lying and are frustrated with me for exposing them as such.

I never bring them except when you do and lie by trying to say they made some claims about how many have died in Gaza, when they've made no such comments at all. I can shut up about them, as I have been, as long as you stop lying about them.

I promised you that I will not let those particular lies go unchallenged. This clearly frustrates you all you have are ad hominem attacks and accusations not even any retweets or pics of dead babies, as below.

You are an old and ignorant racist trying to slam the most trusted medical journal in the world for reporting on your genocide.

Just like Israel has killed the most journalists in war, ever. Because they are trying to hide the genocide from the world.

I see that you're referencing them again so I can't shut up.

I am in no way slamming the Lancet. I am praising them for not making any comment whatsoever about that report's assessment of Gaza. That is not their area of expertise and probably not even in their mission statement. That is why they've made no utterances on the topic. It's the proper approach for them to make. Kudos.

I am slamming you, once again, for trying to use them as a platform with which to spew your hate speech and lies, just the same as you are using TERB. Write them a letter and tell them that they should be more clear.

Your lies shall not pass.

 

[Frankfooter]

When all you can respond with is shut up, you're admitting you've been lying and are frustrated with me for exposing them as such.

I never bring them except when you do and lie by trying to say they made some claims about how many have died in Gaza, when they've made no such comments at all. I can shut up about them, as I have been, as long as you stop lying about them.

I promised you that I will not let those particular lies go unchallenged. This clearly frustrates you all you have are ad hominem attacks and accusations not even any retweets or pics of dead babies, as below.

I see that you're referencing them again so I can't shut up.

I am in no way slamming the Lancet. I am praising them for not making any comment whatsoever about that report's assessment of Gaza. That is not their area of expertise and probably not even in their mission statement. That is why they've made no utterances on the topic. It's the proper approach for them to make. Kudos.

I am slamming you, once again, for trying to use them as a platform with which to spew your hate speech and lies, just the same as you are using TERB. Write them a letter and tell them that they should be more clear.

Your lies shall not pass.

View attachment 367632

Sure, Shazi. You will provide your personal opinion that you are smarter and more informed than the Lancet reviewers and experts who submit pieces because they dare suggest you are backing genocide. We know.

You will then declare how mighty and just Israel for burning families to death and killing children.
Followed by a nazi like gloat that nobody can stop Israel and that Israel will never stop.

Same crap you say every day.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1845757228667511176

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1845759173167841475

 

[southpaw]

Cue some South Asian bullshitter to start yelling it's "all the white colonialists' fault" that South Asians have engaged in inter-community genocide for 3k years and still do it.

There was only one, and he got banned. The rest here probably agree with you.

Also, it's only been about 1k years. Around the time Islam arrived in South Asia to provide much needed cultural enrichment. Just like it does now in the West.

 

[NotADcotor]

When all you can respond with is shut up, you're admitting you've been lying and are frustrated with me for exposing them as such.

I never bring them except when you do and lie by trying to say they made some claims about how many have died in Gaza, when they've made no such comments at all. I can shut up about them, as I have been, as long as you stop lying about them.

I promised you that I will not let those particular lies go unchallenged. This clearly frustrates you all you have are ad hominem attacks and accusations not even any retweets or pics of dead babies, as below.

I see that you're referencing them again so I can't shut up.

I am in no way slamming the Lancet. I am praising them for not making any comment whatsoever about that report's assessment of Gaza. That is not their area of expertise and probably not even in their mission statement. That is why they've made no utterances on the topic. It's the proper approach for them to make. Kudos.

I am slamming you, once again, for trying to use them as a platform with which to spew your hate speech and lies, just the same as you are using TERB. Write them a letter and tell them that they should be more clear.

Your lies shall not pass.

Well I am glad something is doing the good work. Whenever I click to show ignored comment I get punished with the extreme anger and lies and bullshit. It is very difficult for me to read that garbage.

Also on what planet does what we say about Lancet translate into us slamming them. Fucking Lemmy, again is his ability to understand so low that he can't tell the difference between pointing out that Lacnet is a medical journal [and a highly respected one] and that correspondence is not a peer review like they themselves say, or does he know he is Trumping and somehow thinks Trumping will work for him. [To be fair constant lies and bullshit had worked disturbingly well of Trump.

The funny thing is, all he had to do is switch his language from the lie of Lancet said X, to according to a letter published by Lancet, and his statement would be true. It boggles the mind how anyone with the slightest degree of self respect wouldn't do that.

 

[Frankfooter]

Well I am glad something is doing the good work. Whenever I click to show ignored comment I get punished with the extreme anger and lies and bullshit. It is very difficult for me to read that garbage.

Also on what planet does what we say about Lancet translate into us slamming them. Fucking Lemmy, again is his ability to understand so low that he can't tell the difference between pointing out that Lacnet is a medical journal [and a highly respected one] and that correspondence is not a peer review like they themselves say, or does he know he is Trumping and somehow thinks Trumping will work for him. [To be fair constant lies and bullshit had worked disturbingly well of Trump.

The funny thing is, all he had to do is switch his language from the lie of Lancet said X, to according to a letter published by Lancet, and his statement would be true. It boggles the mind how anyone with the slightest degree of self respect wouldn't do that.

I've repeatedly corrected Shazi by saying that the Lancet letter isn't written by the Lancet, their job is to review papers and studies and publish the best of the best. That same standard applies to the letter, which takes an incredibly uncontroversial military casualty calculation and applies it to Gaza. Didn't matter to Shazi and doesn't matter to you, both of you still make ridiculous claims about both the Lancet, the authors and the basis of the calculation.

Those numbers were from June, the numbers now are of course much higher, nor do they take the present extermination campaign in North Gaza into account.

 

[shack]

You will provide your personal opinion that you are smarter and more informed than the Lancet reviewers and experts who submit pieces because they

The Lancet reviews have never made any comment concerning the war in Gaza. So it is impossible to determine who is smarter or more informed. I'm still in the running, it seems, as long as they maintain their silence. And they have no experts in war. They deal in peer reviewed, controlled lab studies. War is beyond their purview.

OK, Geno here's your chance to hit one out of the park. Tell us exactly which Lancet reviewers and experts commented on the war in Gaza? (Can I start laughing yet?)

 

[Frankfooter]

The Lancet reviews have never made any comment concerning the war in Gaza. So it is impossible to determine who is smarter or more informed. I'm still in the running, it seems, as long as they maintain their silence. And they have no experts in war. They deal in peer reviewed, controlled lab studies. War is beyond their purview.

OK, Geno here's your chance to hit one out of the park. Tell us exactly which Lancet reviewers and experts commented on the war in Gaza? (Can I start laughing yet?)

I didn't say anything about Lance reviews.
Try again.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1845985114674590202