The One Spa

Ban smoking on patios

IM469

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2012
11,142
2,472
113
I love the guys in this thread bitch about gov't getting involved in your life in other thread.
I love the guys who equate the prevention of them from adversely affecting the health of others as a government intervention of their freedom to poison others. I don't give a crap if there is a heroin addict beside me but if i was forced to share his sorry habit that is a different story.
 

simon482

internets icon
Feb 8, 2009
9,966
175
63
I love the guys who equate the prevention of them from adversely affecting the health of others as a government intervention of their freedom to poison others. I don't give a crap if there is a heroin addict beside me but if i was forced to share his sorry habit that is a different story.
Nanny state. Police state. Whatever you want yo call it. Besides are you gonna pick up the 7 billion in taxes lost from banning smoking?
 

Petzel

New member
Jul 4, 2011
6,626
3
0
Vaughan
I think what is often missed on the smoking debate is the fact that it is a choice for some of us. There are plenty of things out there that are bad for you but do you really want the government to come in and tell you what you can and cannot do? Look at this shit with sodas in NY...no drinks over 16oz. I don't want some government idiot trying to tell me how to live right. I'll decide what's right for me.

I'm a smoker...I understand that some people don't care to be around smoke. Why do we have to ban it from EVERY restaurant and bar? Why can't there be restaurant/bar owners who choose to have their private establishments smoke free and others who allow smoking? If the smoke is such a problem for non-smokers then the smoke free places should do good business, shouldn't they?!

Maybe my thinking is different because I was raised in the US. It seems to me like freedom means having the right to make your own life choices (even if they lead to fucking up your life). I don't like it when people want to come in and tell others how they should live their lives. As long as what you do isn't hurting others and doesn't involve minors then I say go for it. Do drugs (but don't go out and drive your car into a crowd), go have 13 kids (but don't ask the tax payers to help you out with cash when you can't afford to feed them), pay a woman for sex (but you better both be consenting), gamble away your paycheck at a casino (but don't ask for financial assistance from the government), smoke (but don't look for financial assistance when you develop lung cancer)...etc.
The problem is that second hand smoke does hurt others! If what you choose to do doesn't affect anyone else then fine, but smoking does affect other people.
I am not advocating to make cigarettes illegal but I don't like it when I have to breath other people's smoke.
 

OddSox

Active member
May 3, 2006
3,148
2
36
Ottawa
Ottawa banned smoking on patios this past summer.

The local bar has two patios - one smoking and one non-smoking. The smoking patio used to be packed and the non-smoking mostly empty. Now they're both empty and the patrons who used to be on the smoking patio are nowhere to be seen - they're all drinking at home...
 

blueflame

Member
Dec 5, 2009
128
0
18
I'm a smoker...I understand that some people don't care to be around smoke. Why do we have to ban it from EVERY restaurant and bar? Why can't there be restaurant/bar owners who choose to have their private establishments smoke free and others who allow smoking? If the smoke is such a problem for non-smokers then the smoke free places should do good business, shouldn't they?!
This makes sense to me.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
50,454
9,425
113
Toronto
I think one should keep in mind there is an enormous difference between chronic exposure to smoke as opposed to the occasional exposure such as entering and leaving buildings or having one meal where there is smoke around. Smell is obviously a different issue, but the whole health/cancer thing in relation to occasional exposure is way overstated.

It is the chronic irritation to the tissues which causes cell change, not a few inhalations. It's not like one dose of poison that can kill you.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
The whole experience of sitting around people who are smoking is distasteful. Tobacco companies should develop products that allow the consumption of tobacco WITHOUT interfering with others in the area. The industry has had literally decades to do this, didn't bother, and now the chickens are coming home to roost--the majority of us are fed up with it, and doing something about it. I don't know whether the patio ban will go through, but I know that increasing restrictions will be placed on people who consume tobacco until they find socially acceptable ways to do it.
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,032
3,879
113
Nanny state. Police state. Whatever you want yo call it. Besides are you gonna pick up the 7 billion in taxes lost from banning smoking?
7 billion is peanuts compared to what it costs to give additional health care to smokers plus the costs due to lost productivity.
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
Experiment maybe

I think it would be awesome if the cigarette companies were to put money into building something like bus shelters for smokers. They could all smoke in an enclosed area together where only smokers would have to inhale the second hand smoke. They'd probably need some kind of ventilation to filter the bad air...

I hate having to run ahead of smokers who let their second hand smoke trail behind them into the faces of other pedestrians... I shouldn't have to hold my breath while walking past a building entrance and down the street.
Was in Heathrow a number of years back and saw a smallish glass inclosed room in the middle of a larger area for the smokers, looked like they were put their as a specimans.

When you looked, you could see that you wouldn't have to light up to get your fix.

Should have taken a picture.

FAST
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
Work place

I'm a smoker...I understand that some people don't care to be around smoke. Why do we have to ban it from EVERY restaurant and bar? Why can't there be restaurant/bar owners who choose to have their private establishments smoke free and others who allow smoking? If the smoke is such a problem for non-smokers then the smoke free places should do good business, shouldn't they?!
Problem is,...who do you get to work there ??

And how many lawyers would then get rich ?

FAST
 

mur11

New member
Dec 31, 2003
1,160
2
0
Personally, and I usually don't say this, but this has the 'nanny-state' feel to it. Ban smoking in closed public areas , fine. But to extend this ban to open-air patios is going too far, in my opinion. The next step is to ban smoking altogether, and while smoking is undoubtedly a hazard, if you're going to ban smoking for that, the next step is alcohol. Kills just as many people, and its not a substance that you have to have. Sure, you can argue secondhand smoke. Fine. Personally, and I acknowledge medical science may easily prove me wrong, I doubt the truly ill health benefits of walking through a cloud of smoke in an open-air environments a few times a day. I mean realistically, if you use the arguement that sometimes it's unavoidable, or in your way, you're only talking about being exposed for a few minutes at a time. Anything longer, and you have the choice to move somewhere else. But even if we're talking about the ills of secondhand smoke, what about the effects of alcohol on non-drinkers. Drunk driving etc. Personally I think smokers are an easy target because it's annoying, but in terms of actual health costs to non-smokers, we've eliminated the major cause of secondhand smoke which is repeated exposure in poorly ventilated areas. Now we're talking about eliminating smoking in public, open-air spaces. I question that. You can't legislate away everything that annoys you.
Again, my personal, and admittedly uneducated, opinion. I don't disapprove of it exactly, I just think its going too far. I definitely do disapprove of banning smoking in general.
 

afterhours

New member
Jul 14, 2009
6,322
3
0
I don't give a crap if there is a heroin addict beside me but if i was forced to share his sorry habit that is a different story.
well said
 

afterhours

New member
Jul 14, 2009
6,322
3
0
Maybe my thinking is different because I was raised in the US. It seems to me like freedom means having the right to make your own life choices (even if they lead to fucking up your life). I don't like it when people want to come in and tell others how they should live their lives. As long as what you do isn't hurting others and doesn't involve minors then I say go for it. Do drugs (but don't go out and drive your car into a crowd), go have 13 kids (but don't ask the tax payers to help you out with cash when you can't afford to feed them), pay a woman for sex (but you better both be consenting), gamble away your paycheck at a casino (but don't ask for financial assistance from the government), smoke (but don't look for financial assistance when you develop lung cancer)...etc.
except in the US and A you don't have the freedom to do drugs or to pay for sex...
 

simon482

internets icon
Feb 8, 2009
9,966
175
63
7 billion is peanuts compared to what it costs to give additional health care to smokers plus the costs due to lost productivity.
Bullshit. I posted the numbers last week in a similar thread. 7 billion in taxes collected. 4.4 billion spent on tobacco related illnesses. 3.6 billion left over for your health care.
 

simon482

internets icon
Feb 8, 2009
9,966
175
63
Ban smoking. Take away the license and car of anyone that breaks a driving law. Force people to wear a seat belt, car won't start till it's in. Make it so no one can do anything you don't like. Get rid of the sex industry cuz someone got a disease once.
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,359
11
38
I would like to see them ban stupid but I do not see that happening


you do of course realize you can chose the not walk into a cloud of smoke???
no, of course not
Papa, sometimes you have to make your way to the main entrance of an establishment with people smoking around said entrance, so that you can't avoid them. Some places have their smoking areas away from entrances.
 

afterhours

New member
Jul 14, 2009
6,322
3
0
Ban smoking. Take away the license and car of anyone that breaks a driving law. Force people to wear a seat belt, car won't start till it's in. Make it so no one can do anything you don't like. Get rid of the sex industry cuz someone got a disease once.
 

hungry

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2005
1,520
64
48
I would like to see them ban stupid but I do not see that happening


you do of course realize you can chose the not walk into a cloud of smoke???

no, of course not

So I walk faster than most people, I do not know the people in front of me are smoking, then poof as I pass them, I get a blast of stinky smoke. I did not know and I could not avoid. I usually stay away from your BS old man, but your comments in this thread go beyond the inane as they usually do. No more from me on this thread.
 

Googled

New member
Jan 7, 2006
202
0
0
I think one should keep in mind there is an enormous difference between chronic exposure to smoke as opposed to the occasional exposure such as entering and leaving buildings or having one meal where there is smoke around. Smell is obviously a different issue, but the whole health/cancer thing in relation to occasional exposure is way overstated.

It is the chronic irritation to the tissues which causes cell change, not a few inhalations. It's not like one dose of poison that can kill you.
While i don't enjoy smoke while i'm on a patio i think you're absolutely right. I was totally on board with smoking rooms, a little less positive with an outright ban indoors and totally against the no smoking policies in parks and sidewalks.
 
Toronto Escorts