Just another example of the backstabbing.
Palestinian PM Fayyad slams Arab donors for failing to deliver aid to PA
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diploma...ors-for-failing-to-deliver-aid-to-pa-1.492288
You guys can't get anything right. The word "Palestinians" was never used in that phrase. Myths take on a life of their own in the zionist echo chamber.It was true when it was first coined 40 years ago and still hold up.
I like this quote from Abba Eban: "There is no business like the Shoah business."Well said Bobby, thus the famous saying: The Palestinians never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity.
They couldn't get a better deal under Olmert or anyone else and like you say they sold out the Palestinian people to hatred and political pressure from Iran and those who have intrest in keeping the middle east out of balance.
Of course you would like it, we know you love anything that involves the extermination of Jews.I like this quote from Abba Eban: "There is no business like the Shoah business."
So, what is the quote? I ask the question knowing how bad you are with historical quotes.You guys can't get anything right. The word "Palestinians" was never used in that phrase. Myths take on a life of their own in the zionist echo chamber.
But, it does make you an easy target.
Accusing someone of supporting genocide should be classified as hate speech unless you have very serious evidence and quotes to back it up.Of course you would like it, we know you love anything that involves the extermination of Jews.
So I guess you admit to your hate speech about Israel.Accusing someone of supporting genocide should be classified as hate speech....
I'm not suprised you defend your Master. You should talk , you've been accused of being a Jew hater many times. Birds of a feather flock together.Accusing someone of supporting genocide should be classified as hate speech unless you have very serious evidence and quotes to back it up.
Present quotes or take it back and apologize.
Only if not true.Accusing someone of supporting genocide should be classified as hate speech unless you have very serious evidence and quotes to back it up.
Present quotes or take it back and apologize.
Indeed we have evidence that Gryfin supports the extermination of Jewish citizens of Israel:Accusing someone of supporting genocide should be classified as hate speech unless you have very serious evidence and quotes to back it up.
Present quotes or take it back and apologize.
Or he could have been talking of this:I mean assuming his quote, "there's no business like shoah business", wasn't a dead giveaway.
There are a lot of really hateful ideas in that article which appears to be at least half just a smear if Wiesel. Saying things like girls didn't like him in school and such.Or he could have been talking of this:
http://www.salon.com/2000/08/30/finkelstein_2/
Which contains the quote with references.
As the for the link, I have no idea what you are talking about.
Its possible, but what it does give is credence to the quote that gryfin used that you described as hate speech.There are a lot of really hateful ideas in that article which appears to be at least half just a smear if Wiesel. Saying things like girls didn't like him in school and such.
Some outright lies too. The holocaust wasn't known in the US until 1967? What sort of ludicrous hate babble is that?
The quote is still hate speech even if it is borrowed hate speech.Its possible, but what it does give is credence to the quote that gryfin used that you described as hate speech.
You are accusing former Israeli foreign minister, Abba Eban, of hate speech.The quote is still hate speech even if it is borrowed hate speech.
Eban didn't use it the way that Gryfin and your article used it.You are accusing former Israeli foreign minister, Abba Eban, of hate speech.
He is the author of the quote.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2000/jul/14/historybooks.comment
Backtrack alert.Eban didn't use it the way that Gryfin and your article used it.
In fact I cannot find an original source for that quote--all references to it appear to be in anti-Israeli hate blogs. Maybe it is made up. It is certainly never attributed to any context and never explained when or why he would have said it. I smell a rat.Backtrack alert.
This one is very lame indeed.
The original quote is fine you say, but the very act of quoting it turns it into hate speech?
Squirm away.
So Slate and the Guardian are now both 'holocaust-denial' sites?In fact I cannot find an original source for that quote--all references to it appear to be in anti-Israeli hate blogs. Maybe it is made up. It is certainly never attributed to any context and never explained when or why he would have said it. I smell a rat.
But, absolutely, and without any doubt, it is being used as hate speech in the present context.
Most references to that quote are on holocaust-denial sites....
