Oops..looks like a mistake folks...tough noogies for those Mac haters:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10111958-37.html
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10111958-37.html
Very true!danibbler said:That's a far cry from recommending that users actually install (multiple) AV software.
And you base your recommendation on what? I may come off as an Mac fanboy but at least I do have something to cheer about.cypherpunk said:They did but now they don't but they still should recommend some malware protection.
So, a Mac hater and gaybasher? Good luck with that...digdoo said:Fanboys could be the biggest fag's out there. Apple is for the high school crowd...and fagboys.
danibbler said:So, a Mac hater and gaybasher? Good luck with that...![]()
LOL! The first page of your most recent posts already show you to be a gaybasher. Why deny it?digdoo said:And because I called you a fag I'm a gaybasher? Yeah good luck with that sport.
Apple has a less than stellar track record of responding to serious vulnerabilities. Cheer all you want, but they act like Microsoft circa 2002 and that's not nearly good enough.danibbler said:And you base your recommendation on what? I may come off as an Mac fanboy but at least I do have something to cheer about.
Initially you said that they should recommend malware protection...now you're saying that they don't have a good track record of response. This is all pretty vague stuff...look, the original post was to correct the idea that Apple has recommended anti-virus software.cypherpunk said:Apple has a less than stellar track record of responding to serious vulnerabilities. Cheer all you want, but they act like Microsoft circa 2002 and that's not nearly good enough.
danibbler said:LOL! The first page of your most recent posts already show you to be a gaybasher. Why deny it?
Anyways, life is too short to waste on your sort...good luck.
I agree. I'm trained on Windows, Mac, Linux, and have some Free BSD experience, and I will say each OS has its strength and weakness.canucklehead said:Wow ... fanboy hater .... sounds kind of messed either way u slice it.
I am an Apple System Engineer/Unix/Linux consultant... there is a tool for everything.... everything has its good and bad points.
I deal with so called fanboys and IT Guys that hate Apple "Products just because" ... both of u need to give your heads a shake nothing is perfect.
I'm sorry. The problem is that you don't really follow Mac security or computer security in general. If you did, it would not have been vague at all. More here:danibbler said:Initially you said that they should recommend malware protection...now you're saying that they don't have a good track record of response. This is all pretty vague stuff...look, the original post was to correct the idea that Apple has recommended anti-virus software.
If you've got something else more specific then spit it out.
This isn't vague?cypherpunk said:I'm sorry. The problem is that you don't really follow Mac security or computer security in general. If you did, it would not have been vague at all. More here:
http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/03/28/apple-patches-patchy
Divide by shoe size? Before 2005? What's the number after 2005?The boffins looked at how many times over the past six years the two vendors were able to have a patch available on the day a vulnerability became publicly known, which they call the zero-day patch rate. They then took this number and divided by their shoe size and discovered that there were 658 vulnerabilities affecting Microsoft products and 738 affecting Apple.
This might be OK if Apple ever bothered to patch them particularly fast. The boffins said that Apple was below 20 unpatched vulnerabilities at disclosure consistently before 2005 but these days Apple is always above that figure.
The net result is that the number of unpatched vulnerabilities are higher at Apple.
If you think I'm a OS X fanboi then you've never truly dealt with any.canucklehead said:I deal with so called fanboys and IT Guys that hate Apple "Products just because" ... both of u need to give your heads a shake nothing is perfect.