ANYBODY BUT HARPER, all other parties to repeal C36

[AdamH]

I've been noticing lately that the Tory haters are getting more shrill as the election continues. I suppose when you see something you want slipping away it happens to some people.

I would kill to be able to vote Tory..

I think the Libs are idiots, and the Dippers are dangerous.. As such I usually throw my vote away on the Greens (at least I respect the bulk of their platform).

The Tories seem content to turn away my vote (and the vote of thousands of other fiscally conservative, socially liberal people).

I believe in Capitalism. I believe in the free market. I believe in small government and responsible spending.

I do not believe in the the government trying to silence government paid scientists because their facts don't jive with the current governing party line.

I do not appreciate the government labeling me a criminal because I've found a woman willing to have sex with me in exchange for money.

I don't appreciate the government labeling me a criminal because I want to grow and smoke my own pot.

I don't believe the government should trying to tell the public what they can and cannot wear to a fucking ceremony that is purely symbolic and (aside from its symbolism) has nothing to do with the actual process of vetting somebody for Canadian citizenship.

 

[bver_hunter]

Do you ever THINK before you type,...???

FAST

What the hell are you on about??????

 

[FAST]

Any number of reasons.. You really are a hateful little man.
Perhaps some Canadians are misinformed and are worried that the entire citizenship process would be done anonymously (fearing the woman's face would be covered for the entire process, rather than just the ceremony)/

Some Canadians,...???,…88%
And just when did ANYBODY suggest that the the vast majority of Canadians were insulted because they thought the women would hide her face other than the ceremony,...???

Perhaps some Canadians (like Butler) just like tradition, and don't want to change. (Although I'm quite certain that tradition has actually allowed for these types of religious accommodations in the past... Prior to the ban which was just recently overturned)

Some Canadians,...???,…88%
You bring up a good point,...some just like tradition,...were people show respect,...and are willing to change.

Perhaps some Canadians are hateful swine who are pathetically obsessed with doing anything and everything to make Muslims feel like they don't belong.

Some Canadians,...???,…88%
Actually a LOT of Canadians feel that a culture that forces their women to hide their face in public,…and if not obeyed,…through acid in their face, slash their face,…or murder them en masse,...don't belong.

Perhaps some Canadians are just averse to any kind of "religious accommodation" because they misinterpret "freedom of religion" as "freedom FROM religion".

Some Canadians,...???,…88%
Explain something for me,…Christmas trees are not allowed in government properties,…because of "freedom FROM religion",…but a new migrant is allowed to insult her new country because of "freedom of religion"

And still with the low class, loser insults,…but I just consider the source.

FAST

 

[FAST]

What the hell are you on about??????

If you want me to explain,...all you have to do,...is just ask.

FAST

 

[bver_hunter]

If you want me to explain,...all you have to do,...is just ask.

FAST

Just ask yourself what statements you keep on throwing at others.

 

[FAST]

Just ask yourself what statements you keep on throwing at others.

I know what statements I keep on throwing at others,...

Originally Posted by bver_hunter
When did you see protests or debates about it before that Kenney dude brought it to everyone's attention? Duh!

Still waiting for you to ask me why that post is ridiculous,...

FAST

 

[bver_hunter]

I know what statements I keep on throwing at others,...




Still waiting for you to ask me why that post is ridiculous,...

FAST

Why is it ridiculous? When the Liberals were in power was there such a problem during the swearing in ceremony. Were there protests about women covering their faces? Don't know what your gripe is all about?

 

[lomotil]

Why is it ridiculous? When the Liberals were in power was there such a problem during the swearing in ceremony. Were there protests about women covering their faces? Don't know what your gripe is all about?

Tbe Ontario Premier and the corresponding Attorney General appear to be not onside with Bill C36 and therefore in Ontario at least not much will happen. Yet still , the city of Toronto is the largest enabler and profiter of brothels in Canada and strongly anti-Harper. It is is possible for this to change, but it is unlikely.

 

[bver_hunter]

The Ontario Premier and the corresponding Attorney General appear to be not onside with Bill C36 and therefore in Ontario at least not much will happen.m Yet still , the city of Toronto is the largest enabler and profiter of brothels in Canada and strongly anti-Harper. It is is possible for this to change, but it is unlikely.

Yes Wynn had grave concerns and asked the deputy attorney general to review and see whether it was unconstitutional. The attorney general 's findings are that it was not unconstitutional. That is why all the premiers have to grudgingly accept this law. But many of them are open to eradicating this law and coming up with something that is more dignified to actually protect the rights of all in a safe way including customers and not lumping them with the pimps like Mckay seems to believe.

 

[lomotil]

Bill C36 has lethal consequences for hobbyist and previously nobody really knew how it would pan out. To date, Bill 36 has proven to be a lame duck law not enforced. To have some teeth, the law would have had to have been taken seriously from the onset. It is a non election issue as ejaculating after ejavulation keep$ happening across the land.

 

[bver_hunter]

Bill C36 has lethal consequences for hobbyist and previously nobody really knew how it would pan out. To date, Bill 36 has proven to be a lame duck law not enforced. To have some teeth, the law would have had to have been taken seriously from the onset. It is a non election issue as ejaculating after ejavulation keep$ happening across the land.

With Jason Kenney accusing Trudeau of supporting brothels in neighborhoods and promising to be more tight on the sex industry, do not expect that this "lame duck" scenario to go on if the Tories are given another 4 year mandate. At the moment the police do not have the resources to go after each and every client in the business. They are targeting child sex workers and trafficking barons. Expect it to change depending on the outcome of these elections.

 

[JohnLarue]

Yes Wynn had grave concerns and asked the deputy attorney general to review and see whether it was unconstitutional. The attorney general 's findings are that it was not unconstitutional. That is why all the premiers have to grudgingly accept this law. But many of them are open to eradicating this law and coming up with something that is more dignified to actually protect the rights of all in a safe way including customers and not lumping them with the pimps like Mckay seems to believe.

Bottom line is that law enforcement have the teeth to go after pimps, traffickers & abusers of children, so this is a positive thing.
Has any bee charged for consensual meetings between adults ?
No

Lighten up

 

[fuji]

Bottom line is that law enforcement have the teeth to go after pimps, traffickers & abusers of children, so this is a positive thing.
Has any bee charged for consensual meetings between adults ?
No

Lighten up

They had that power before c36. C36 added only one new power: the power to go after men who have paid consensual sex with adult women.

 

[bver_hunter]

Bottom line is that law enforcement have the teeth to go after pimps, traffickers & abusers of children, so this is a positive thing.
Has any bee charged for consensual meetings between adults ?
No

Lighten up

Bottom line is that you did not need Bill C36 to go after the pimps, traffickers and child sex trade. This policing of these type of disgusting sex traders was taking place effectively and did not require such legislation. The difference as the research shows is that customers will not be so eager to report child sex abuses or trafficking of women if they happen to stumble on such appointments. Now it is clear why they wont do so as they face being charged even if they do not participate in the sex. This makes the escorts less safe, at least that is how a number of escorts now perceive this retarded bill to be. You have your views and I have mine. You can express yours as much as you have, but I am not buying it so like it or lump it. If Harper gets one more term, then as Jason Kenney mentioned they are going to clamp down on this sex trade. You implying that he is lying?

 

[JohnLarue]

Bottom line is that you did not need Bill C36 to go after the pimps, traffickers and child sex trade. This policing of these type of disgusting sex traders was taking place effectively and did not require such legislation.

How do you know that
Are a lawyer?
Do have stats on the number of pimps charged vs. convicted?

The difference as the research shows is that customers will not be so eager to report child sex abuses or trafficking of women if they happen to stumble on such appointments. Now it is clear why they wont do so as they face being charged even if they do not participate in the sex. This makes the escorts less safe, at least that is how a number of escorts now perceive this retarded bill to be. You have your views and I have mine. You can express yours as much as you have, but I am not buying it so like it or lump it.

Blah Blah Blah

If Harper gets one more term, then as Jason Kenney mentioned they are going to clamp down on this sex trade. You implying that he is lying?

Nope
Just telling you that you are paranoid
Clamping down could very well mean clamping down on pimps, traffickers & kiddie didlers. Which is just fine with me

 

[JohnLarue]

They had that power before c36. C36 added only one new power: the power to go after men who have paid consensual sex with adult women.

Prove this
are you a lawyer? No

Just like how you claimed the oils sands drove inflation up in Canada, when inflation has been benign for years
You are full of shit again

 

[bver_hunter]

Prove this
are you a lawyer? No

Just like how you claimed the oils sands drove inflation up in Canada, when inflation has been benign for years
You are full of shit again

Are you a lawyer? The law clearly states that buying sex is a crime. What do you not understand? We all know that you are Harpo's spokesperson on this board. Are you also a RCMP constable? Otherwise you keep on spewing all this tosh as if you are the spokesperson on the economy and law and disorder.

 

[bver_hunter]

How do you know that
Are a lawyer?
Do have stats on the number of pimps charged vs. convicted?


Blah Blah Blah


Nope
Just telling you that you are paranoid
Clamping down could very well mean clamping down on pimps, traffickers & kiddie didlers. Which is just fine with me

You think that you know all the facts. How many more pimps etc got caught under this retarded C36 Law? Are you a sheep with all your ridiculous blah blahing. Where do you get all your facts from? For a change show us some proof. Ask the ladies on this board if they are any better under this law.

 

[JohnLarue]

Are you a lawyer? The law clearly states that buying sex is a crime. What do you not understand? We all know that you are Harpo's spokesperson on this board. Are you also a RCMP constable? Otherwise you keep on spewing all this tosh as if you are the spokesperson on the economy and law and disorder.

Answer my question before asking yours

 

[bver_hunter]

Prove this
are you a lawyer? No

Just like how you claimed the oils sands drove inflation up in Canada, when inflation has been benign for years
You are full of shit again

I said the Oil Sands drove up inflation? Where did you get that crapshit from?

You said there were no earthquakes in Alberta. You seem to think that you know everything.

Finally, I said that C36 targets the purchase of sex, that is considered a crime. Do I have to be a lawyer to mention that statement?