Take your medication for the sensitivity of the Harper figurehead that you adore. When you come out with some rubbish about Trudeau and Castro then you get what you deserve.
Another Attack on Christians
- Thread starter SkyRider
- Start date
Do you consider the oppression and killing of innocent Kurds by Turkey justified?
Yes, even Mandela was a stupid dumbass when young, but gain wisdom with age. Mandela became a pacifist and realize the power of peaceful revolution.
As a young fighter all he achieved was to be labelled a terrorist and sentenced to prison. As a pacifist and leader of peaceful revolutionary moment, he became the President of South Africa, mourned and missed by the world upon his death, and now a legend, in the ranks histories greatest human beings.
I do not justify any killings whatsoever, where did I mention it??? There are Kurds and the large majority of them living in peace in Turkey which is a democracy if you are unaware of it, as well as they belong to NATO. Yes, since the attempted coupe it is practically like a police state.
Looks like you trying to justify the numerous terrorist acts carried out by the PKK as being okay as the victims are Muslims.
Tamils in Toronto have been supporting the Tamil Tigers or intimidated into funding them for years. Is Tamil support for terrorism okay because they generally don't attack civilians in Canada?
Oh no. You mentioned the IRA. Don't you know that Sky thinks of them as 'good' terrorists?
Obviously not. The Kurds were the one group completely screwed in the Paris Peace Conference.
But none of that justifies them targeting civilians. If the PKK etc only went after soldiers and military infrastructure you could justify them as freedom fighters but that's not what they do.
Daesh has taken "credit" for the bombing of the Copic Church. It was originally assumed the culprit was the Muslim Brotherhood.
Any educated person knows that not all "terrorists" are the same. In some, not all, cases oppressed people turn to "terrorism" because all peaceful means proved futile.
"Mandela was a controversial figure for much of his life. Although critics on the right denounced him as a communist terrorist and those on the radical left deemed him too eager to negotiate and reconcile with apartheid's supporters." After the defeat of apartheid, he layed down his weapons and promoted democracy and reconciliation.
Question: Are there any oppressed people in the history of this planet who have never been branded "terrorists"? Maybe the 1915 Armenians who were marched to their death?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide
Any educated person knows that not all "terrorists" are the same. In some, not all, cases oppressed people turn to "terrorism" because all peaceful means proved futile.
"Mandela was a controversial figure for much of his life. Although critics on the right denounced him as a communist terrorist and those on the radical left deemed him too eager to negotiate and reconcile with apartheid's supporters." After the defeat of apartheid, he layed down his weapons and promoted democracy and reconciliation.
Question: Are there any oppressed people in the history of this planet who have never been branded "terrorists"? Maybe the 1915 Armenians who were marched to their death?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide
LaRue...don't get me started Dad, or I'll be forced to publicly dismantle your feeble logic yet again.
Last edited:
They still are cockroaches if they choose to attack innocent civilians over politics.
Insurgent tactics like IEDs hitting poorly protected military targets is a legitimate means of battling oppression. Hitting civilians is not. It's a pretty simple line.
