Given the legal advice you've given on Terb over the years, this must be trueCriminal law / negligence law is state jurisdiction under the US Constitution, Phil.
Given the legal advice you've given on Terb over the years, this must be trueCriminal law / negligence law is state jurisdiction under the US Constitution, Phil.
he aimed a gun and pulled the trigger, case closedWhat exactly did he do wrong? What protocols did he breech? I'm asking because I haven't seen anything to date. Please provide some evidence, other than you feel he should do some time because he killed someone.
Fortunately the law disagrees with your distorted view.I don't have to agree. And I don't. It's absolutely insane that someone can take a gun into public and shoot people, and get away with it. And anyone who thinks otherwise needs serious fucking mental help.
Fortunately the law disagrees with your distorted view.
There is nothing insane about shooting people who attempt to kill or injure you. No different than putting down a rabid dog that's attacking an innocent person. Shoot it to death.
Except that's NOT how it's ever been done in the film business.Even if he didn’t pull the trigger, a woman is dead because Baldwin failed to do a simple safety check.
Anyone who has ever handled a weapon knows that it is your responsibility to check regardless of what anyone else told you. If you don’t know how then you don’t pick up the weapon.
I'm guessing practice / rehearsing camera angles, etc.Didn't read all of the thread but:
I still haven't figured out why he was pointing the gun at those people anyways. Was it a practice scene, was he joking around. Does anybody know the reason the gun was pointed at the person that got killed?
Please explain the difference.OJ was "not proven guilty" by the Stare therefore he was acquitted.
Kyle Rittenhouse however was found not guilty by a trial of his peers. Why? KYLE RITTENHOUSE DID NOTHING WRONG.
There State didn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that OJ was guilty, however KR was found not guilty (i.e. proven innocent) based on the readily available preponderance of crystal clear evidence put forward.Please explain the difference.
So OJ Simpson wasn't found not guilty in a court of law according to you?Uppity
There State didn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that OJ was guilty, however KR was found not guilty (i.e. proven innocent) based on the readily available preponderance of crystal clear evidence put forward.
Unless he didn't pull the hammer back to where it caught. If he pulled it half back and released it, then it would hit the round anyway. The gun had misfired a couple of times and might have been in shit shape.In the interview, Baldwin says "he didn't pull the trigger but cocked the hammer and released it" Essentially what he's saying is he manually fired the gun. If you don't have your finger on the trigger then the hammer doesn't spring forward when released. If you cock the hammer and your finger is on the trigger it relieves tension on the trigger and you don't need any pressure on the trigger to fire the gun. He doesn't know anything about guns....what he was doing was erasing any safeties the gun naturally had built-in. Protocol on the set with any firearm is that all people are supposed to be standing behind the shooter when any gun is being handled and if the gun is to be aimed at the camera in a scene then the camera is run remotely. This was a rehearsal. His finger would have done just as good until they figured out what look they wanted.
I think OJ did it too, obviously...that trial was all about the "Dream Team" overmatching a bad performance by Marcia Clark and her team...the prosecution couldn't beat down the race issue, did the disastrous "try on the glove" theatrics, had their own witnesses caught lying on the stand...they didn't do a good job.OJ was acquitted too. Means nothing.
based on film history (Brandon Lee)...Alec Baldwin should know better. Never trust anyone no matter what business you're in. That gun ended up in his hand, he had the final responsibility to inspect it. are at least make sure it's not pointed towards someone. It is a real gun, not a plastic toy gun. Protect yourself at all times.Except that's NOT how it's ever been done in the film business.
Sure, when you pick up Uncle Joe's old .22, you check it thoroughly and you never, ever point it at someone. But the film business has its own protocols and they're very different. You don't have an on site gun expert whose job it is to do that check for you and handle the gun.
he shot assailants going after him, he didn't randomly went there and start firing...self defense according to the jury of his peers...I don't have to agree. And I don't. It's absolutely insane that someone can take a gun into public and shoot people, and get away with it. And anyone who thinks otherwise needs serious fucking mental help.
The glove was a miscalculation. The racist cop was a disaster, but probably a surprise to the DA. Cop probably lied when interviewed by the DA's office.I think OJ did it too, obviously...that trial was all about the "Dream Team" overmatching a bad performance by Marcia Clark and her team...the prosecution couldn't beat down the race issue, did the disastrous "try on the glove" theatrics, had their own witnesses caught lying on the stand...they didn't do a good job.