.
Do you know what really undermines democracy and insults voters? Rigging redistricting.
While I understand that the demographics of a riding can change, those changes are seldom so dramatic because these shifts take time. If you find a radical shift, it's far more likely that it stems from a radical change in circumstance. A dripping faucet can flood a house, but not in an hour. If a fire truck arrived at the house to put out a fire during that hour, your better bet is that that firehose caused the flood, not the dripping faucet.
Poilievre is VERY effective at taking down crappy leadership. Just ask Justin Trudeau. No wonder so many Liberals wish he wouldn't be around anymore!
Probably the worst quality of Liberal supporters is your abysmally low standards of competence that you demand from your leadership. Pee Wee hockey convener, environmentalist, and stay at home dad.
It seems less so, every election held during my life. I think we live in an idiocracy.
Carney has as much chance of "hitting it out of the park" as Dr. Fauci has of pitching a perfect game. It's laughable to me that Liberals now invest so much hope and faith in a guy who is virtually Canada's "Trump Lite" (by comparison of their business experience) and hasn't worked for "the average guy" at any point in his life, and yet point to Poilievre as the one with suspicious motives. It would be funny if it wasn't so idiotic.
OMFG, dude… seriously, what color is the sky in your world? Because the narrative you just spun is so wildly detached from reality, it’s either permanently sunset-pink or deep conspiracy blue.
Let’s talk about redistricting, a routine, non-partisan process handled by independent commissions to reflect demographic shifts. This isn’t a Liberal plot. It’s how
every functioning democracy adapts to population changes. Your firehose analogy is dramatic, sure, but wildly off the mark, unless you think Elections Canada is rolling up in a tanker to personally wash out Conservative votes.
As for Poilievre being "VERY effective", only if you measure effectiveness by volume, not results. He’s great at yelling in Question Period and trending on Facebook. Actual policy? Solutions? Building consensus? Not so much.
And the "peewee hockey convener, environmentalist, stay-at-home dad" line? That’s supposed to be an insult? Because to most Canadians, that sounds like someone relatable, grounded, and kind of human. Contrast that with someone who’s made a career of weaponizing division and selling snake oil in a suit.
And Carney as “Trump Lite”? That’s almost impressive in its absurdity. You’re really out here comparing a Rhodes Scholar and former head of two central banks to a guy who literally thought nuking hurricanes was a solid policy idea. The Trump Lite moniker rightfully so stuck on Pee Pee so much that even a flushable wipe loaded with alcohol couldn't get the yellow stain off.
