Goober Mcfly said:
"Disagreeing" cannot be used as an adjective or a participle in this context.
Sentence should read "...as a response to a viewpoint with which you disagree."
Al-kaida
- Thread starter Peace4u
- Start date
"Disagreeing" cannot be used as an adjective or a participle in this context.
Sentence should read "...as a response to a viewpoint with which you disagree."
The 51 Al-Keida cells was reported by Bill O,Reilly of fox news and so was the deserter storie.Canada has not prosecuted anyone and allows people into your Country without any I.D.
ROTFLMAO!Peace4u said:
ooooohhhh soooo scaaaaaary! Fox news the last bastion of unbiased journalistic integrity! hahaha
Ham---do you even care if AL-KEIDA is training in your own backyard.Why do Canadians want to ignore the problem,and just point out U.S. faults.We are at least doing something about it.Maybe one day it may become Canadas problem also.
Peace4u said:
Oh My God - there they are!!!! Right in-between the swings and the barbeque!
CALL THE COAST GUARD! CONDITION RED!
Drama drama drama! Yes Canada should be vigilant and should strengthen it's intelligence agencies. But if one surrenders civil liberties, well, you might as well not be "free". That is one of the prices of "freedom". 51? Give us detail about each one. Do not just spit out numbers, substantiate with FACTS!Peace4u said:
"The only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance." - Franklin D. Roosevelt
"Freedom is not worth having if it does not connote freedom to err." - Mohandas K. Gandhi
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security" - Benjamin Franklin
"Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!" - Patrick Henry
"When liberty is taken away by force it can be restored by force. When it is relinquished voluntarily by default it can never be recovered." - Dorothy Thompson
"Freedom is not something that anybody can be given. Freedom is something people take, and people are as free as they want to be." - James Baldwin
"There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty." - John Adams
"For those who stubbornly seek freedom, there can be no more urgent task than to come to understand the mechanisms and practices of indoctrination. These are easy to perceive in the totalitarian societies, much less so in the system of 'brainwashing under freedom' to which we are subjected and which all too often we sere as willing or unwitting instruments." - Noam Chomsky
"If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom; and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more, it will lose that too." - Somerset Maugham
"None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free." - Goethe
Tom
Ever Vigilent is the price of FREEDOM and SECURITY.
To be unwilling to be vigilent is showing an unwillingness to defend those freedoms.
Be warned if you think it will stop with the US, it wont. Not as long as Christian or Jew survives. Have you noticed how it is beging to "snowball"? France was a huge supporter of Sodamned Insane, yet what happened there or almost did???
Be very wery of those who's root belief is you are inferior to them.
Ever Vigilent is the price of FREEDOM and SECURITY.
To be unwilling to be vigilent is showing an unwillingness to defend those freedoms.
Be warned if you think it will stop with the US, it wont. Not as long as Christian or Jew survives. Have you noticed how it is beging to "snowball"? France was a huge supporter of Sodamned Insane, yet what happened there or almost did???
Be very wery of those who's root belief is you are inferior to them.
Al Qaida is about as real as the leafs winning the cup.!!! Coincidence that all this nonsense started when GW Bush came into power.
As for the joker saying that they are training in our back yard, he needs to lay off the Fox News and CNN.
It is all a question of do you believe everything they tell you. I don`t.
Tom - nice quotes and Chomsky books are incredible, a must read for all terbites.
As for the joker saying that they are training in our back yard, he needs to lay off the Fox News and CNN.
It is all a question of do you believe everything they tell you. I don`t.
Tom - nice quotes and Chomsky books are incredible, a must read for all terbites.
This may be what is refrenced in this thread.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,118511,00.html
Crunch Time for Canada
Thursday, April 29, 2004
By Bill O'Reilly
Hi, I'm Bill O'Reilly. Thank you for watching us tonight.
Crunch time for Canada, that is the subject of this evening's "Talking Points Memo." Last night, we told you about two American Army privates who deserted, fled to Canada, and are being hailed by heroes by some Canadian media. The two have filed for asylum even though they are not entitled to it under Canadian law. We said that if granted asylum, "Talking Points" would call for a boycott of Canadian goods and services by all Americans.
Well, that's caused all kinds of angst in Canada. Thousands of letters have poured in. And we will read some of them to you in our mail segment, but one caught my eye.
Paul in Kingston, Ontario writes, "I feel real anger towards Canadian media people who are so blatantly anti-American. Please do not use my last name, I fear government reprisal."
More than a few Canadian e-mailers said the same thing. They're afraid of their government if they dissent from the anti-American party line.
Since 9/11, the Canadian government has done the following. Refused to crack down on known terrorist organizations. Not one individual has been prosecuted for terrorist activities, even though U.S. intelligence has identified at least 50 pro-terror outfits operating north of the border. Continued its loose immigration policies. Is allowing Islamic courts in Ontario to decide on some civil cases involving Muslims. Refused to send troops to Iraq. Decriminalized marijuana, making it easier for smugglers to send pot into the U.S.A. And supported a quasi-legalization of heroin in the city of Vancouver.
Now, however, the last straw is in the drink. If the Canadian government provides sanctuary to American military criminals, deserters, "Talking Points" believes that action would directly undermine the U.S. war on terror.
At this point, I believe the Canadian government will send those guys back here. But if it doesn't, then we, the people, of the U.S.A. should hold that country accountable, just as we are holding France accountable.
All of us in America should be soldiers in the war on terror. If a foreign country's helping those who want to kill us, then we have an obligation to confront that. These deserters weren't drafted. They signed up. And when the going got tough, they split. If all our military people did that, 9-11 would be on constant instant replay.
Canada is now on notice. Undermining the American military by giving sanctuary to deserters will bring action by the most powerful force on this earth, the American people.
And that's "The Memo."
NOTE: We have posted this poll question on billoreilly.com. Would you support a boycott against Canadian goods and services if that country does not return the American deserters? Billoreilly.com has it for you
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,118511,00.html
Crunch Time for Canada
Thursday, April 29, 2004
By Bill O'Reilly
Hi, I'm Bill O'Reilly. Thank you for watching us tonight.
Crunch time for Canada, that is the subject of this evening's "Talking Points Memo." Last night, we told you about two American Army privates who deserted, fled to Canada, and are being hailed by heroes by some Canadian media. The two have filed for asylum even though they are not entitled to it under Canadian law. We said that if granted asylum, "Talking Points" would call for a boycott of Canadian goods and services by all Americans.
Well, that's caused all kinds of angst in Canada. Thousands of letters have poured in. And we will read some of them to you in our mail segment, but one caught my eye.
Paul in Kingston, Ontario writes, "I feel real anger towards Canadian media people who are so blatantly anti-American. Please do not use my last name, I fear government reprisal."
More than a few Canadian e-mailers said the same thing. They're afraid of their government if they dissent from the anti-American party line.
Since 9/11, the Canadian government has done the following. Refused to crack down on known terrorist organizations. Not one individual has been prosecuted for terrorist activities, even though U.S. intelligence has identified at least 50 pro-terror outfits operating north of the border. Continued its loose immigration policies. Is allowing Islamic courts in Ontario to decide on some civil cases involving Muslims. Refused to send troops to Iraq. Decriminalized marijuana, making it easier for smugglers to send pot into the U.S.A. And supported a quasi-legalization of heroin in the city of Vancouver.
Now, however, the last straw is in the drink. If the Canadian government provides sanctuary to American military criminals, deserters, "Talking Points" believes that action would directly undermine the U.S. war on terror.
At this point, I believe the Canadian government will send those guys back here. But if it doesn't, then we, the people, of the U.S.A. should hold that country accountable, just as we are holding France accountable.
All of us in America should be soldiers in the war on terror. If a foreign country's helping those who want to kill us, then we have an obligation to confront that. These deserters weren't drafted. They signed up. And when the going got tough, they split. If all our military people did that, 9-11 would be on constant instant replay.
Canada is now on notice. Undermining the American military by giving sanctuary to deserters will bring action by the most powerful force on this earth, the American people.
And that's "The Memo."
NOTE: We have posted this poll question on billoreilly.com. Would you support a boycott against Canadian goods and services if that country does not return the American deserters? Billoreilly.com has it for you
I thought papsmerf was joking, but then I followed the link and it really is posted for all to see.
Since I've never watched Fox News, I ask a serious question - is this Bill O'Reilly a comedian, kind of like This Hour Has 22 Minutes on CBC? Or is he trying to pass this stuff off as serious news?
Since I've never watched Fox News, I ask a serious question - is this Bill O'Reilly a comedian, kind of like This Hour Has 22 Minutes on CBC? Or is he trying to pass this stuff off as serious news?
xarir said:
Mr O'reily is a well respected journelist.
I belive he is respected on both sides of the house for his ability to be fair in his interviews
papasmerf said:
Bill O'Reily is as widely respected as an impartial journalist as Tbull is as an impartial message-board moderator.
My "insight ok proof" (???????????):
1. Go to Google.
2. Type in "bill o'reilly respected journalist"
3. Click "I'm feeling Lucky"
4. Read.
1. Go to Google.
2. Type in "bill o'reilly respected journalist"
3. Click "I'm feeling Lucky"
4. Read.
Similar threads
