Who are you referring to?How is inheriting billions taking a risk lol.
Who are you referring to?How is inheriting billions taking a risk lol.
We blame them for cheating the rules to get rich and stay rich.So people like to bitch about billionaires and what they got. I get they don't pay their fair share of taxes.
But don't blame them for being successful. They took all the risk.
Do people expect them to take much of their wealth and start giving it away to buy houses for the poor, randomly pay for peoples health care?
I would love to be a billionaire or even a multimillionaire but I'm not.
One thing I don't do is blame billionaires for my own situation.
I say good for them. They had the smarts and balls to take the risks.
Not all Billionaire started from scratch. In fact, most had a big head start in life.But don't blame them for being successful. They took all the risk.
So they were born into it. Who cares, good for them.Not all Billionaire started from scratch. In fact, most had a big head start in life.
Who cares? well, the 300 million people who work but can't make ends meet.So they were born into it. Who cares, good for them.
You are dreaming. There will always be different economic "classes". Accept it and move on with your life.Who cares? well, the 300 million people who work but can't make ends meet.
The country, the society has to work for everyone.
No dream. This is very real.You are dreaming. There will always be different economic "classes". Accept it and move on with your life.
Reagan was a disaster. The famous trickle down theory. In the long run the trickle downed towards moving production abroad. Paying pennies abroad so more could go down to the pocket of a few.Billionaires used to be taxed at a higher rate in the USA in the 1950s. Much higher. There was much less inequality then.
However, the USA tax code was written to favor the hedge fund types, who get their income taxed as capital gains not earned income as those of us who get fortnightly paycheques do. Since Reagan almost all the changes in USA tax code have favoured the very wealthy. So it was rigged. I begrudge no rich people and most of them I can admire and say "good on ya".
Folks like Warren Buffet and Michael Bloomberg have talked alot about how taxes are bent to their favour.
why?concentration of wealth is a problem,
Medical bills account for 40% of bankruptcies - PMC
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
This says at least 40%
However there is a lot of not reporting reasons, so they think 50% up to 60+% is actually happening.
And yes is does happen quite regularly. Deductibles alone are now as high as $14,000. Then coverage denial comes in, drug costs, copays, no insurance and more. Also trying to protect spouses.
Sorry dude, it's nasty down there. And btw medical results in job losses, extra loans on mortgages and yes, loaning money to family to save their lives. Would you let let your kid die? Think about it.
About 500000 Americans filed for bankruptcy protection in 1999 largely because of heavy medical expenses, according to the study, which is to be published next month in a finance journal, Norton's Bankruptcy Adviser.
500,000 is 0.015% of the populationUnited States/Population
334.9 million (2023)
Per year. Which means since 1999 that's 12.5 MILLION. And that is the number of bankruptcies, not the number of people affected by it. You can easily triple it by adding spouses and children. Suddenly in the last 25 years that's 10% of the population who experienced this.so if this is true ( I am skeptical) then the Canadian Governments (Provincial / Federal) are assuming all that bankruptcy risk for the benefit of approx. 50,000 Canadians (assuming a 10:1 US / CAD) >> how long before Canada govts become bankrupt?
Canadas universal health care system is not sustainable and the moron Justin Trudeau & irresponsible provincial liberal / NDP govts has accelerated the time line for its demise
500,000 is 0.015% of the population
not at all sufficient to demand the remaining 99.85% of the population immunize this tiny group from theses bankruptcies
that is what health care insurance premiums are for
the mortality rate in the US is 0.75% per year vs bankruptcy rate of 0.015%Per year. Which means since 1999 that's 12.5 MILLION. And that is the number of bankruptcies, not the number of people affected by it. You can easily triple it by adding spouses and children. Suddenly in the last 25 years that's 10% of the population who experienced this.
you can not protect the public against adverse life eventsThen on top if that how many didn't go bankrupt but we're severely affected. Retirement savings wiped out. Home had to be sold. Divorced to protect spouses.
what you call price schedule and no price gouging is really government subsidiesAnd as to why this doesn't affect universal healthcare it's simple. We have a price schedule and no price gouging. They will charge 100 bucks for a Tylenol, 25 bucks per diaper to a new mother, and so many other egregious charges Hollywood would be accused of bad writing if they put it in a movie. 300 for an insulin module that costs 30 bucks here. Same brand.
the average American knows diddly squat about Canada let alone our health care system or taxation regimeAsk any American of average means what they prefer. They will happily tell you Canada, warts and all.
no it is not solvable and you will sadly get to observe thisWe have problems too. But ours are solvable.
no it is not a good thingAnd btw healthcare premiums have continued to skyrocket. With deductibles up to $14,000. And denial rates average 16%. You think that is a good thing?
if Elon Musk , Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos double their wealth does it change your wealth ? NO !Who cares? well, the 300 million people who work but can't make ends meet.
its the other way aroundThe country, the society has to work for everyone.
See the difference in opinion is simple. I think healthcare is a human right. And you don't. You think that everything should have have a profit motive. I don't.the mortality rate in the US is 0.75% per year vs bankruptcy rate of 0.015%
spouses and children are certainly affect by death
you can not protect the public against adverse life events
you can not protect the public against adverse life events
what you call price schedule and no price gouging is really government subsidies
again the risk is borne by govt in Canada
the average American knows diddly squat about Canada let alone our health care system or taxation regime
no it is not solvable and you will sadly get to observe this
an aging demographic, higher than CPI inflation for heath care equipment and materials and excessive govt debt will ensure universal health care is unsustainable
no it is not a good thing
which is exactly why the govt should not be assuming the risk
Depends.if Elon Musk , Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos double their wealth does it change your wealth ? NO !
if Elon Musk or Bill Gates Jeff Bezos wealth gets cut in 1/2 does it change your wealth ? NO !
How do we benefit immensely from this?you on the other hand have benefited immensely from the products, services provided by billionaires / millionaires
spite is a terrible foundation for policy making
The vast majority already do this.its the other way around
everyone has to work for the benefit of the country / society
Give the money? What do you mean by "give"?So it's better to give all the money to a few billionaires? Their problem is at this pace within 10 years or so they will run out of other people's money.
500,000 is 0.15% of 340,000,000 not 0.015%. Who is the moron now.500,000 is 0.015% of the population
You think most billionaires in the world inherited their vast wealth?How is inheriting billions taking a risk lol. I am quite fortunate, but the growing stratification of wealth will make our country poorer and more like Haiti