A warning from Bernie Sanders to America

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,014
22,355
113
So people like to bitch about billionaires and what they got. I get they don't pay their fair share of taxes.
But don't blame them for being successful. They took all the risk.
Do people expect them to take much of their wealth and start giving it away to buy houses for the poor, randomly pay for peoples health care?
I would love to be a billionaire or even a multimillionaire but I'm not.
One thing I don't do is blame billionaires for my own situation.
I say good for them. They had the smarts and balls to take the risks.
We blame them for cheating the rules to get rich and stay rich.
Nobody expects them to give their money away, that's what taxes are for.

Tax them, make them pay the same tax rate as teachers and cops.

 
  • Like
Reactions: jalimon

DesRicardo

aka Dick Dastardly
Dec 2, 2022
2,465
2,555
113
You are dreaming. There will always be different economic "classes". Accept it and move on with your life.
No dream. This is very real.

Your whole economic model is based on the middle class being prosperous. If they continue to get poorer, what are you going to do? You're no better than a 3rd world country.

Look at this thread made yesterday. China spends billions to improve the country for everyone.

In America, they are still using rail infrastructure from 1890's. :ROFLMAO:

Better watch out what you accept and move on with.
 

kherg007

Well-known member
May 3, 2014
9,151
7,261
113
Billionaires used to be taxed at a higher rate in the USA in the 1950s. Much higher. There was much less inequality then.
However, the USA tax code was written to favor the hedge fund types, who get their income taxed as capital gains not earned income as those of us who get fortnightly paycheques do. Since Reagan almost all the changes in USA tax code have favoured the very wealthy. So it was rigged. I begrudge no rich people and most of them I can admire and say "good on ya".
Folks like Warren Buffet and Michael Bloomberg have talked alot about how taxes are bent to their favour.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

jalimon

Well-known member
Jan 10, 2016
6,840
6,654
113
Billionaires used to be taxed at a higher rate in the USA in the 1950s. Much higher. There was much less inequality then.
However, the USA tax code was written to favor the hedge fund types, who get their income taxed as capital gains not earned income as those of us who get fortnightly paycheques do. Since Reagan almost all the changes in USA tax code have favoured the very wealthy. So it was rigged. I begrudge no rich people and most of them I can admire and say "good on ya".
Folks like Warren Buffet and Michael Bloomberg have talked alot about how taxes are bent to their favour.
Reagan was a disaster. The famous trickle down theory. In the long run the trickle downed towards moving production abroad. Paying pennies abroad so more could go down to the pocket of a few.

Now some orange idiot politicians is capable to make his monkey followers believe tjat these jobs will come back 🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: JuanGoodman

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,443
3,077
113
concentration of wealth is a problem,
why?
capitalism and access to affordable reliable energy have done a great job of reducing world wide abject poverty

1736052304825.png
if you were really concerned about inequality you would focus on the 8% left hand tail instead of the miniscule right hand green tail

1736052622695.png


but no
you and the loonie left liberals want to restrict access to fossil fuels kill innovation and turn the 8% red into 58% red
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,443
3,077
113

This says at least 40%
However there is a lot of not reporting reasons, so they think 50% up to 60+% is actually happening.

And yes is does happen quite regularly. Deductibles alone are now as high as $14,000. Then coverage denial comes in, drug costs, copays, no insurance and more. Also trying to protect spouses.

Sorry dude, it's nasty down there. And btw medical results in job losses, extra loans on mortgages and yes, loaning money to family to save their lives. Would you let let your kid die? Think about it.

so if this is true ( I am skeptical) then the Canadian Governments (Provincial / Federal) are assuming all that bankruptcy risk for the benefit of approx. 50,000 Canadians (assuming a 10:1 US / CAD) >> how long before Canada govts become bankrupt?
Canadas universal health care system is not sustainable and the moron Justin Trudeau & irresponsible provincial liberal / NDP govts has accelerated the time line for its demise


About 500000 Americans filed for bankruptcy protection in 1999 largely because of heavy medical expenses, according to the study, which is to be published next month in a finance journal, Norton's Bankruptcy Adviser.

United States/Population
334.9 million (2023)
500,000 is 0.015% of the population

not at all sufficient to demand the remaining 99.85% of the population immunize this tiny group from theses bankruptcies
that is what health care insurance premiums are for
 
Last edited:

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,735
4,905
113
so if this is true ( I am skeptical) then the Canadian Governments (Provincial / Federal) are assuming all that bankruptcy risk for the benefit of approx. 50,000 Canadians (assuming a 10:1 US / CAD) >> how long before Canada govts become bankrupt?
Canadas universal health care system is not sustainable and the moron Justin Trudeau & irresponsible provincial liberal / NDP govts has accelerated the time line for its demise







500,000 is 0.015% of the population

not at all sufficient to demand the remaining 99.85% of the population immunize this tiny group from theses bankruptcies
that is what health care insurance premiums are for
Per year. Which means since 1999 that's 12.5 MILLION. And that is the number of bankruptcies, not the number of people affected by it. You can easily triple it by adding spouses and children. Suddenly in the last 25 years that's 10% of the population who experienced this.

Then on top if that how many didn't go bankrupt but we're severely affected. Retirement savings wiped out. Home had to be sold. Divorced to protect spouses.

And as to why this doesn't affect universal healthcare it's simple. We have a price schedule and no price gouging. They will charge 100 bucks for a Tylenol, 25 bucks per diaper to a new mother, and so many other egregious charges Hollywood would be accused of bad writing if they put it in a movie. 300 for an insulin module that costs 30 bucks here. Same brand.

Ask any American of average means what they prefer. They will happily tell you Canada, warts and all. We have problems too. But ours are solvable.

And btw healthcare premiums have continued to skyrocket. With deductibles up to $14,000. And denial rates average 16%. You think that is a good thing?
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,443
3,077
113
Per year. Which means since 1999 that's 12.5 MILLION. And that is the number of bankruptcies, not the number of people affected by it. You can easily triple it by adding spouses and children. Suddenly in the last 25 years that's 10% of the population who experienced this.
the mortality rate in the US is 0.75% per year vs bankruptcy rate of 0.015%
spouses and children are certainly affect by death
you can not protect the public against adverse life events



Then on top if that how many didn't go bankrupt but we're severely affected. Retirement savings wiped out. Home had to be sold. Divorced to protect spouses.
you can not protect the public against adverse life events

And as to why this doesn't affect universal healthcare it's simple. We have a price schedule and no price gouging. They will charge 100 bucks for a Tylenol, 25 bucks per diaper to a new mother, and so many other egregious charges Hollywood would be accused of bad writing if they put it in a movie. 300 for an insulin module that costs 30 bucks here. Same brand.
what you call price schedule and no price gouging is really government subsidies
again the risk is borne by govt in Canada

Ask any American of average means what they prefer. They will happily tell you Canada, warts and all.
the average American knows diddly squat about Canada let alone our health care system or taxation regime

We have problems too. But ours are solvable.
no it is not solvable and you will sadly get to observe this
an aging demographic, higher than CPI inflation for heath care equipment and materials and excessive govt debt will ensure universal health care is unsustainable

And btw healthcare premiums have continued to skyrocket. With deductibles up to $14,000. And denial rates average 16%. You think that is a good thing?
no it is not a good thing
which is exactly why the govt should not be assuming the risk
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,443
3,077
113
Who cares? well, the 300 million people who work but can't make ends meet.
if Elon Musk , Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos double their wealth does it change your wealth ? NO !
if Elon Musk or Bill Gates Jeff Bezos wealth gets cut in 1/2 does it change your wealth ? NO !

you on the other hand have benefited immensely from the products, services provided by billionaires / millionaires

spite is a terrible foundation for policy making

The country, the society has to work for everyone.
its the other way around

everyone has to work for the benefit of the country / society
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,735
4,905
113
the mortality rate in the US is 0.75% per year vs bankruptcy rate of 0.015%
spouses and children are certainly affect by death
you can not protect the public against adverse life events




you can not protect the public against adverse life events



what you call price schedule and no price gouging is really government subsidies
again the risk is borne by govt in Canada



the average American knows diddly squat about Canada let alone our health care system or taxation regime



no it is not solvable and you will sadly get to observe this
an aging demographic, higher than CPI inflation for heath care equipment and materials and excessive govt debt will ensure universal health care is unsustainable


no it is not a good thing
which is exactly why the govt should not be assuming the risk
See the difference in opinion is simple. I think healthcare is a human right. And you don't. You think that everything should have have a profit motive. I don't.

I don't think a child should when treatment is available, be allowed to suffer or die, because profit is more important.

I'm not sure you even realize that is what you are being an advocate for.
 

DesRicardo

aka Dick Dastardly
Dec 2, 2022
2,465
2,555
113
if Elon Musk , Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos double their wealth does it change your wealth ? NO !
if Elon Musk or Bill Gates Jeff Bezos wealth gets cut in 1/2 does it change your wealth ? NO !
Depends.
How much are they paying in taxes?
Where will this tax revenue go?

you on the other hand have benefited immensely from the products, services provided by billionaires / millionaires

spite is a terrible foundation for policy making
How do we benefit immensely from this?


Spite is when you cut the American working class out the process and the wealth, for your own gain.

its the other way around

everyone has to work for the benefit of the country / society
The vast majority already do this.

It's the rich that don't care. When it all crashes, the rich can pick-up and move anywhere in the world.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
7,009
4,120
113
So it's better to give all the money to a few billionaires? Their problem is at this pace within 10 years or so they will run out of other people's money.
Give the money? What do you mean by "give"?

No one forces you to use their products & services.
You think they're the problem?

Ok let's walk this through...

What if you managed to convinced everyone to stop using Amazon completely.
Tell us what would happen and how that would fix the problem you've been conditioned to believe is caused by successful people.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
7,009
4,120
113
How is inheriting billions taking a risk lol. I am quite fortunate, but the growing stratification of wealth will make our country poorer and more like Haiti
You think most billionaires in the world inherited their vast wealth?
OMFG
 
Toronto Escorts