Massage Adagio

A socratic question..

T

Terminator2000

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
3,495
170
63
let me run an idea by u okay?

say...

a guy has a good job etc etc - money, car

all the vital essentials

he's not bad looking either

not exactly brad pitt

but he does everything he can to keep her entertained

lavish her with good treatment, pampering, dinners

does that cause her to eventually overlook his "flaws"?


---

we're not talking about a huge horn on his face.

Something like maybe a scar..for example. Or a height gap.

---

Your opinions?
 
Seeing as looks are genetic a lot of ugly people have procreated so yes it's possible. :D

Seriously though....
I think confidence is the great equalizer when it comes to imperfections.
 
does that cause her to eventually overlook his "flaws"?
Click to expand...

I would say so.

Let's see if she still stays with you when you lose your job and can't pamper her with lavish gifts. :cool:
 
overlook flaws? Never. Accept, often.

well overlook is a specific thing. I think women can accept flaws and in some case find flaws "not a big deal". In some cases the good in a relationship will permit a woman to accept enourmous flaws (like voting for Bush).

I would however say that there is a fine line between treating a woman you love like a princess and trying to buy affection. Most woman can smell the diference at 100 paces and will respond to one and feel contempt for the other.

A dangerous strategy.
 
Yup..

LordLoki said:
well overlook is a specific thing. I think women can accept flaws and in some case find flaws "not a big deal". In some cases the good in a relationship will permit a woman to accept enourmous flaws (like voting for Bush).

I would however say that there is a fine line between treating a woman you love like a princess and trying to buy affection. Most woman can smell the diference at 100 paces and will respond to one and feel contempt for the other.

A dangerous strategy.
Click to expand...

What he said.

I really wonder about the guys who get into this line of thought. Someone recently said his "looks were a 5". OK! You got it made!
Oh, but maybe the '..bad luck with women" is due to:
hygiene- 4
Listening-2
Sense of humour- 4
empathy-1
Expectations of women-10

just wondering......
 
Bear669 said:
What he said.

I really wonder about the guys who get into this line of thought. Someone recently said his "looks were a 5". OK! You got it made!
Oh, but maybe the '..bad luck with women" is due to:
hygiene- 4
Listening-2
Sense of humour- 4
empathy-1
Expectations of women-10

just wondering......
Click to expand...

So, you're opposing Loki's statement?
 
Terminator2000 said:
let me run an idea by u okay?

say...

a guy has a good job etc etc - money, car

all the vital essentials

he's not bad looking either

not exactly brad pitt

but he does everything he can to keep her entertained

lavish her with good treatment, pampering, dinners

does that cause her to eventually overlook his "flaws"?


---

we're not talking about a huge horn on his face.

Something like maybe a scar..for example. Or a height gap.

---

Your opinions?
Click to expand...
Did this happen to Socrates?
 
answer: just as long as the flaw isn't a small penis.
 
I think it depends on what you want to attract and keep. If you want shallow and not so intelligent, then buying her things will work for a while until something better comes along. If you want someone well-rounded and with a good heart, then your actions alone will be appreciated. After all, actions speak louder than words.
 
shack said:
Did this happen to Socrates?
Click to expand...

Actually, Socrates was quite ugly. He even walked the catwalk once, for a beauty show in Greece, among alot of beautiful people to prove that "True Beauty Lies Within"

Even, tho the crowd mocked and booed him.

And I don't think he was gay. I think he was bisexual
 
I thought a 'gay' Greek..

DonQuixote said:
Socrates wasn't gay. Please.
....

I repeat, Socrates wasn't gay.
He was slandered, however.
Click to expand...

.. of that era was someone who only craved women?!
 
Bear669 said:
.. of that era was someone who only craved women?!
Click to expand...
No, that was a sexual deviant! :)

A Socratic question, BTW, is one that does not require an answer.

Perry
 
big_iguana said:
I thought that was a rhetorical question ???

I thought Socratic questioning was ask the individual to elaborate in his answer enough to make him contradict himself (basically, give him enough rope to hang himself)(please comment)
Click to expand...
Ooooops!

What was I smoking? :D

You are, of course, correct!

Perry
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Toronto Escorts
Top Bottom
Back