A Cancer 'Vaccine' Cured 97% of Tumors in Mice. What's That Mean for People?

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
A Cancer 'Vaccine' Cured 97% of Tumors in Mice. What's That Mean for People?

By Rachael Rettner, Senior Writer | March 29, 2018 07:13am ET

A promising new cancer "vaccine" that cured up to 97 percent of tumors in mice will soon be tested in humans for the first time — but experts say that we're still a long way off from this type of drug being prescribed to cancer patients.

Researchers from Stanford University will test the therapy in about 35 people with lymphoma by the end of the year, according to SFGate, a local news outlet in San Francisco. The treatment stimulates the body's immune system to attack cancer cells. In studies in mice with various cancers — including lymphoma, breast cancer and colon cancer — the treatment eliminated cancer tumors in 87 out of 90 mice, even when the tumors had spread to other parts of the body, the researchers said.

Dr. Alice Police, the regional director of breast surgery at Northwell Health Cancer Institute in Westchester, New York, who was not involved in the study, said that the news of a human trial to test this treatment is "exciting." However, she cautioned that results in animal studies don't always translate to people.

"We've been able to cure a lot of cancers in mice for a long time," Police told Live Science. What's more, the current human trials are for patients with lymphoma, and so it could be many years before doctors know if this treatment works for other cancers, such as breast and colon cancer, Police said. [10 Do's and Don'ts to Reduce Your Risk of Cancer]

A cancer vaccine?

The new treatment is not technically a vaccine, a term used for substances that provide long-lasting immunity against disease. But the treatment does involve a vaccine-like injection, SFGate reported. (According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology, a "cancer vaccine" can refer to a treatment that's used to prevent cancer from coming back and destroys cancer cells that are still in the body.)

Instead, the treatment is a type of immunotherapy. It contains a combination of two agents that stimulate T cells, a type of immune cell, to attack cancer. Normally, the body's T cells recognize cancer cells as abnormal and will infiltrate and attack them. But as a tumor grows, it suppresses the activity of the T cells so that these cells can no longer keep the cancer at bay.

The new treatment works by reactivating these T cells. Researchers inject the "vaccine" directly into the tumor. The two agents in the treatment work synergistically in activating the T cells. Because these T cells were already inside the tumors, they have essentially been "prescreened" by the body to recognize cancer-specific proteins, the researchers said.

In the animal studies, injecting the treatment into just one tumor worked to eliminate tumors in other parts of the body (so-called metastatic cancers). This occurs because active T cells migrate to other parts of the body and destroy tumors that have spread.

In a study that was published Jan. 31 in the journal Science Translational Medicine, scientists gave the treatment to mice that were genetically engineered to develop breast cancer in all 10 of their mammary pads. The drug was injected into the first tumor that appeared in the animal, and the researchers found that the treatment also prevented the occurrence of future tumors in many cases, the researchers said.

Promising immunotherapies

Immunotherapy is not new; indeed, several other immunotherapies have been approved for treating cancer. For example, a treatment called CAR T-cell therapy, which was recently approved for some types of leukemia and lymphoma, involves removing certain immune cells from patients' bodies and genetically engineering those cells to fight cancer.

Compared with CAR T-cell therapy, one advantage of the new treatment is that it doesn't require doctors to remove and customize the patient's immune cells for fighting cancer, the researchers said. "We're attacking specific targets without having to identify exactly what proteins the T cells are recognizing," Dr. Ronald Levy, a professor of oncology at Stanford University School of Medicine and the senior author of the Science Translational Medicine study, said in a statement.

It's also interesting that the work may have implications for colon and breast cancer, two cancers for which there are currently no immunotherapies, Police said.

"We've [gone] one step further down the road" to an immunotherapy for these cancers, Police said. "But it's [still] a long way to go."

The new trial is a phase I study, which means it will test only the safety of the treatment and is not designed determine how effective it is.

https://www.livescience.com/62161-cancer-vaccine-trial.html
 

Freedom1970

Banned
Jan 4, 2011
307
0
16
Just like the Polio virus cure that had 99% cure rate. When University researchers discover great cures " BIG PHARMA " buys up the patents & moth balls them. There is some 4000+ patents that U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and BIG PHARMA COMPANIES have bought & mothballed. Numerous times in the past 3 decades ex top executives from BIG PHARMA have blown the whistle on their Industry. They have said time & time again .... CURES MAKE NO MONEY!!! ... And Big Oil companies do not want us to use revolutionary energy systems
 
Last edited:

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
52,662
10,980
113
Toronto
Charlemagne


A Cancer 'Vaccine' Cured 97% of Tumors in Mice. What's That Mean for People?


It means that our pet mice will live longer.
 

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
Charlemagne


A Cancer 'Vaccine' Cured 97% of Tumors in Mice. What's That Mean for People?


It means that our pet mice will live longer.
It could mean more than that, which is the whole point of the article.
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,063
3,956
113
There's no money in a cure.

There's only money in treatments. They want you to have to swallow a beaker of pills every day for the rest of your (miserable) life.
 

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
10,533
2,497
113
I've heard these promising stories for 40 years........but all I see is continued fundraising for cancer research and no cures.
 

Freedom1970

Banned
Jan 4, 2011
307
0
16
I've heard these promising stories for 40 years........but all I see is continued fundraising for cancer research and no cures.
You have not been following closely. Over the years several types of cures came out. ..... Only to have BIG PHARMA buy the patents & lockem up. Google Polio Virus cure for cancer. P.S. The Cancer Societies are now owned in part by Big Pharma & are part of the Big Money Cancer Industry
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
The new treatment is not . . . a vaccine, a term used for substances that provide long-lasting immunity against disease.

Instead, the treatment is a type of immunotherapy. It contains a combination of two agents that stimulate T cells, a type of immune cell, to [continue to] attack cancer. Normally, the body's T cells recognize cancer cells as abnormal and will infiltrate and attack them. But as a tumor grows, it suppresses the activity of the T cells so that these cells can no longer keep the cancer at bay.
Note typical popularization of science article it takes seven paragraphs to get to what should have been in the first or second paragraph.
 

Big Sleazy

Active member
Sep 13, 2004
3,535
8
38
It means that it will never see the light of day. Too much money and control involved in the Cancer iindustry.
 
O

OnTheWayOut

Maybe if we eat the mice after they take the drug it will be more effective.
 

Dougal Short

Exposed Member
May 20, 2009
1,225
18
38
We don't know, lots of stuff that worked on mice doesn't work for humans.
True enough, but it also means it might work...

The comparison with the polio vaccine isn't really accurate. Polio is caused by a specific virus, which is easily transmittable between humans. "Cancer' on the other hand, is caused my many, many things, and combinations of things. Cancer is in a constant state of mutation and growth.

Both are great news, but in many ways, the cure for polio was child's play, comparatively...
 

Master Baiter

Active member
Dec 20, 2001
1,462
8
38
Next week's headlines.... "Scientist who cured mice of cancer found dead from multiple self-inflicted gunshot wounds to the head after burning research documents"
 

Freedom1970

Banned
Jan 4, 2011
307
0
16
True enough, but it also means it might work...

The comparison with the polio vaccine isn't really accurate. Polio is caused by a specific virus, which is easily transmittable between humans. "Cancer' on the other hand, is caused my many, many things, and combinations of things. Cancer is in a constant state of mutation and growth.

Both are great news, but in many ways, the cure for polio was child's play, comparatively...
Not the Polio vaccine. A cure for cancer by injecting Polio virus into the tumor. Here is the 60 Minutes documentry:
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,833
2,212
113
Ghawar
I've heard these promising stories for 40 years........but all I see is continued fundraising for cancer research and no cures.
If the money donation goes to the Canadian Cancer
society it would be more correct to call it fund raising
for administration of the allocation of funds to cancer
research.
 

HungSowel

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2017
2,875
1,757
113
Patents only last for some 20 years, so if big pharma is trying to kill a cure they can only do so for that long.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts