If I was to reseach your implied conspiracy accusations I would follow the following steps. First, investigate what evidence there is on how the terrorists decided on September 11th. Second, was September 11th a hard date, ie would the same circumstances have existed on the 10th, 12th or 13th. Then I would look at how the decision was made on the NORAD training exercises, were they unusual, was a decison made about timing influenced by outside sources. I would then look at the top ranking officials and their schedules, again were they unusual or influenced by outside sources. Of course rather than doing actual research it is alot easier just to blindly read the conspiracy sites.anomandar said:
or blindly accept that none of this was all unexceptional.
In democratic countries, it's called democracy when people decide they don't like the existing government and "turn against them".VinnyBuff said:best post in this thread.
Actually I do my research before posting and I try very hard to go to the original source and read for myself. I was just not willing to do your research for you, even though I have read the original documents related to your post. Most conspiracy sites just copy and paste from other conspiracy sites, and most conspiracy believers just copy and paste those posts in threads like these. So rather than being negative and all pouty why don't you go read the source material rather than relying on the Coles Note's version.anomandar said:
After the Bay of Tonkin, the "evidence" pointing to those WMDs, and a great many more tall tales from various US luminaries, it is little wonder that half the world suspects the US could somehow involved in just about any calamity anywhere on our planet. Everything except the weather, earthquates, volcanoes, tidal waves etc. The US is like the boy who cried "wolf" - about 50 times too often. LOLwoolf said:
If u did your research as u claim u would not have originally responded in the fasion in which u did. Very vague attitude imo but these are forums so maybe i read into it. The answers are there. Instead u made a post suggesting that i " just blindly read the conspiracy sites" and garble it all down. I do not. I take everything for what it is worth and put into my own perspective. If i see a decent link that has credible information or testimonial from people actually involved. Im listeng/watching/reading and then im passing that information along. Tbh im standing on a soap box with this issue cause i REALLY believe there is something up BIG time. Its scarey my friend, so scarey its gonna take a real change, not only from perspective but real hard change. I cant help but wonder if we have gone past the point of no return. So far gone that we do not even see the lines being crossed anymore. Its just a blurr.dreamer said:
You gave a sarcastic response, that to me was stating that a conspiracy is so obvious that those who do not accept it must be idiots (my opinion and interpretation of what you wrote) My response was simply do research rather than rely on what the conspiracy sites state. If you actually followed my advice maybe you would come to a different conclusion, that the states were pathetically arrogant and unprepared.anomandar said:
Of course i was being sarcastic, your opening statement wasdreamer said:
You are confused on the order of events, just like a true conspiracistanomandar said:
It is well documented by all the conspiracy sites, I am not sure if it remotely could be classified as a documented fact. You just used typical conspiracy terminology, you should be proud.
