You mistake my intention. I am not defending the agencies. A pimp is a pimp is a pimp no matter what how you try to dress it up "agencies" and their owners are pimps.hunter001 said:It is pathetic those that would make excuses for "Agencies" that would do due diligence on "their" workers. In the light of day one can determine age of the SP they are "hiring". It sound like you like trolling for ... Whatever dude.
I don't go to S.C.s anymore. I am not that interested in ladies even in their early 20's any more. I only see more mature SPs that are well reviewed and been around sometime. I don't go after the ones guys are drooling over that just turned "19".
A john is a john is a john, no matter how we rationalize our behaviour.
You expect the "agencies" to do more do diligence and yet you offer me only soft excuses why you don't check IDs to ensure you are not seeing underaged SPs. If you are so terribly offended, and your standards are so high, then you should refuse to see an SP that does not provide you with proper ID.
What about the drug, alcohol and gambling addicts that work, should we not be ensuring that these girls are also looked after?
Johns don't get me wrong, it is terrible that a 15 year old girl has been forced into prostitution and it should not happen, but lets not bullshit ourselves here.