Still in other jurisdictions that could get you a sentence of up to five years.the media is making this into something more serious, from what I got from the media he would run up to women, assault them and run. he would probably grope them and run for a thrill.
You're initial comment seemed to say that it was the media which was reporting the kid 'was' pulling the women in alley and raping them. That was the report I was expecting."The suspect was described in the past as a black male, with a heavy build and short hair, who approached victims from behind and molested them before running away."
in that g&m article...so it sounds like this kid was smacking asses and running away giggling like a fag
how the fuck did you get that from my previous comment? you have a serious problem of never admitting a mistake no matter how smallYou're initial comment seemed to say that it was the media which was reporting the kid 'was' pulling the women in alley and raping them. That was the report I was expecting.
HAHAHAHAYou're initial comment seemed to say that it was the media which was reporting the kid 'was' pulling the women in alley and raping them. That was the report I was expecting.
A misunderstanding is one thing, but at least I`m not a liar like you. As far as not admitting i`m wrong, you`re not paying attention, again, as I`ve admitted it a number of time, not that I`m often wrong but certainly a lot less than you.how the fuck did you get that from my previous comment? you have a serious problem of never admitting a mistake no matter how small
This a big problem that the media are talking about these days. When the police say "sexual assault", everyone assumes it's rape. If someone gets off by pinching someone's butt and running away, the police also report it as sexual assault for legal purposes. It's not right to pinch someone's butt without permission and he should be charged, but a distinction should be made in the degree or type of sexual assault that it is.
All the women in the area assume a rapist is running around attacking women when it could or could not be the case.
haha I don;t think so, you buried yourself there with a good example of your bs tactics. that was really ridiculous but thats how you debate peopleA misunderstanding is one thing, but at least I`m not a liar like you. As far as not admitting i`m wrong, you`re not paying attention, again, as I`ve admitted it a number of time, not that I`m often wrong but certainly a lot less than you.
For those who don`t get to the Business forum.
junior gold miners in the final stages of development
As I said a misunderstanding, not much more.HAHAHAHA
Blacky my boy, you even quoted him where he said "wasn't"
LOL - You have to see the humor in that at least????
I'll let others decide for themselves. Your opinion means so little.haha I don;t think so, you buried yourself there with a good example of your bs tactics. that was really ridiculous but thats how you debate people
I was banned for no reason, I didnt break any rules. I didnt post anything stupid that was your opinion, my economic and political school of thought is reputable and irrefutable I didnt make anything up. I do know people who have taken my business advice on this site and have made money.As I said a misunderstanding, not much more.
The BS this guy shoveled in the P&IA forum and here about knowing everything he needs to know and calling anyone who sees things differently as mindless idiots, or some such things, has to be a few bricks short a load. The scary part is that some will believe his advice. I don't remember anyone else being permanently banned from the P&IA forum alone. It's a bloody arena, much more lenient than here. Then he thinks he has a noteworthy legacy there that others should emulate.
Careful, just a word of advice. Fred even gave you a warning about your posts, as do the mods often, but you apparently didn't heed his advice. Another lie will not go over well. You even accuse me, in a pm, of getting you banned, when I actually suggested to Fred, I believe in a post, you be allowed to stay.I was banned for no reason, I didnt break any rules. I didnt post anything stupid that was your opinion, my economic and political school of thought is reputable and irrefutable I didnt make anything up. I do know people who have taken my business advice on this site and have made money.
If he even has a mom, she'll probably say he was a good kid, that she's shocked, and that she doesn't believe the charges against him. All in tears.I'd be interested in hearing what his parents (probably a single mother) has to say about that ....
Canada is the same. Also, I don't believe msog has any source for what he has said. There have been several female columnists recently in Toronto daily newspapers who have been sharply critical of the police for not providing more details. It is the police who have simply said it was a "sexual assault" without any further qualification, it is not the media that is witholding the information--the media is complaining about not having better information to report, and publishing editorials arguing that this lack of better information has been irresponsible.Still in other jurisdictions that could get you a sentence of up to five years.
So it certainly is not an "oh never mind" offense.
His uncle was on cp24 claiming that the police made an error. That he is not that type of kid. That he would never do this. Looks like the kid was living with his uncleIf he even has a mom, she'll probably say he was a good kid, that she's shocked, and that she doesn't believe the charges against him. All in tears.
Always be wary of mothers. They're like battered women. They'd sooner kill you than admit that their kid is a fuckup.
Maybe it was the uncle on earlier occasions.His uncle was on cp24 claiming that the police made an error. That he is not that type of kid. That he would never do this. Looks like the kid was living with his uncle
