Its documented that over policing does not significantly reduce crime rates and results in other undesirable outcomes.
School Shooting In Minnesota With A Twist
- Thread starter The Oracle
- Start date
A good responsible and informative take on things.
Apparently he was involved in an internet death cult.
Brain dead take when all the school shooters are white males right wing nuts
Law abiding citizens in crime ridden neighborhoods want more policing not less.
I only checked Uvalde and it turns out you are wrong as usual.
Nothing you post can be taken seriously.
Texas shooting: How false rumours spread that gunman was trans
Images of three trans women were shared online purporting to be of the gunman after the school shooting.
www.bbc.com
So you think law abiding citizens in crime ridden neighborhoods want less policing?
Fake News about all those shooters being "Trans"!!!!
So guns were not one of the main reasons that resulted in the killing of those two children and injuring several others?
Of course the trans story line has been debunked as more right wing fake news. The guy was the usual right wing wacko.... you gonna delete your embarrassing thread now? LOL! Thoughts and prayers!!!!
You're proposing banning trans people from owning guns?..That's one of your better ideas come to think about it.
I know you think you are making an educated statement, but arguments like this don't pass the logic test.
What determines over-policing? Relative to that question, would anyone believe zero police would lead to better outcomes?
Do you really think the Left should be selling the crazy right wing tranny message to the public?
Sometimes before you post you want to run it through your head a few times. Maybe even ask a buddy. Does this sound good?
It is documented that increased policing, does not improve community safety.
It leads to other unintended consequences as well.
Community safety needs more than policing.
Also - "would anyone believe zero police would lead to better outcomes" is a strawman - the choices aren't between over policing and zero policing.
First off, the Toronto land acknowledgement statement on the beginning of their website might give you an idea of the political biases of the John Howard Society.It is documented that increased policing, does not improve community safety.
It leads to other unintended consequences as well.
Community safety needs more than policing.
Also - "would anyone believe zero police would lead to better outcomes" is a strawman - the choices aren't between over policing and zero policing.
My point of who determines what is over-policing still stands.
PS- Perhaps you didn't realize that the zero police was a rhetorical question relative to my entire comment. A community has to find what they consider the optimal amount of police. Like it or not, the amount of police is generally determined by voter sentiment. Criticizing over-policing is often a political slogan of the left. It's a not so distant cousin to defund the police. It doesn't offer much clarity.
The polling bears out that urban residents want more police. Of course polling is only one indicator of voter sentiment. If urban Mayors and city councils commit to increasing the number of policemen they should be held to that commitment.
You have a problem with guns but not the mental health...guns don't kill people...people kill people...
Give a dog a gun and it won't kill anybody...give a pig a gun and it won't kill anybody...
the only exception...
