Just some highlights:
Currently Jobless:
CEO of a company in CONGO?! lmfao.
PhD from some shady college that is now permanently closed. lmao.
lmao:
Minnesota Politicians assassinated.
- Thread starter Butler1000
- Start date
Currently Jobless:
CEO of a company in CONGO?! lmfao.
PhD from some shady college that is now permanently closed. lmao.
lmao:
We are not discussing Islamic terror in Europe. That's a red herring.
We aren't discussing homicides. That is both a red herring and a criminal justice issue.
We are discussing terrorism in North America being one of the biggest national security threats.
Right wing domestic terrorism is the primary form of terrorism that is a threat to national security in North America - both in number of incidents and number of victims.
They are identified as the primary terrorist threat due to a persistent pattern of violence, over the last several years, with a 320% increase in recent years.
The democrats disowning their own guy because he's a murderous SOB...
keep squirming and spinning lefturds...
keep squirming and spinning lefturds...
right wingers are so easy to foolThe democrats disowning their own guy because he's a murderous SOB...
keep squirming and spinning lefturds...
but hey, that's how fascists get their followers
who else is going back rapists, fraud artists, felons and genocidal racists?
Conspiracy theories about Minnesota shooter aren't just deflection. They're dangerous
False counter-narratives signal to other terrorists that MAGA has their back
where do you get your numbers from ? Truth social lmao https://www.statista.com/statistics/1466623/murder-offenders-in-the-us-by-race/
according to this black people comprise 29.7%
el risitas, have do you have one of RFK jr's brain worms?Sure sure franky...your gaslight strategy don't work....it hasn't work at all...
the guy was just another garden variety, MAGA incel
You claimed body count wasnt a factor when determining whats a greater terrorism threat.
I claim you dont know what you're talking about.
As you can see form AI responses below, body counts play a large factor.
From Google AI (important words in red bold):
While lethality (the number of fatalities) is a significant factor in assessing the impact of a terrorist attack, it's not the sole measure of the overall threat. Terrorism threat levels are typically determined by a combination of factors including intelligence, recent events, the intent and capabilities of terrorist groups, and the frequency of attacks. Lethality is a crucial element, but the broader context of an attack's impact on society, including psychological effects and disruption, is also considered
From Grok: https://x.com/i/grok?conversation=1934618448153227675
Q. Is the threat of terrorism measured by lethality of attacks?
A. The threat of terrorism isn't solely measured by the lethality of attacks, though that’s a significant factor. It’s also assessed by frequency, intent, capability, and impact—both physical and psychological. A single high-casualty attack, like 9/11, can reshape global security perceptions, but so can a series of smaller, frequent attacks that erode public confidence. For example, the FBI and DHS use metrics like attack frequency, target type (e.g., civilian vs. infrastructure), and group capabilities (e.g., access to weapons, funding, or networks) to gauge threat levels. Lethality matters—higher death tolls amplify fear and economic disruption—but non-lethal attacks, like cyberterrorism or propaganda, can also destabilize
Last edited:
Yes, body counts don't matter when terrorism is compared to homicides.
Homicide is a criminal justice issue.
Terrorism is a national security issue.
Therefore, even if Terrorism results in a lower body count, it is considered far more serious.
But within the various categories of terroristic murders committed, the body counts do matter.
There are more right wing terrorist attacks, and they result in higher body count, in North America, than any other form of terrorism.
Therefore they are the biggest national security threat in North America.
Here is results for the last 20 years from AI:
So you are saying that Black people are twice as likely to be falsely arrested. Everyone knows that
No, you said body count doesnt matter when determining how great a terrorism threat is.
You were wrong. Admit it
Now add the 9/11 terror attack, and what do you get??Here is results for the last 20 years from AI:
No, thats not what I said.
Have a look at gun crime stats
Gun Violence in Black Communities
For decades, gun violence has taken a disproportionate and grueling toll on Black communities.
giffords.org
I said even though homicides are more in number, and terror related deaths are lower than homicides, terrorism is still considered the bigger threat, as it is about national security.
You were trying to compare homicides to terrorism.
Here we are comparing terrorism related deaths.
They are not the same.
We are also discussing post 9/11.
9/11 is an extreme outlier and including 9/11 to conveniently "boost" numbers when there is a 320% increase in right wing terrorism recently, would be disingenuous and a false argument.
It is also why the federal agencies don't determine threats that way either.
From a common sense standpoint - which is more likely: A right wing terrorist mass shooting people or a plane hijacked by Islamic terrorists flying into a building killing 1000s?
You're still not getting it.
When it comes to Islamic terrorism it is by far the greater threat when it comes to mass casualties.
When it comes to frequency of terrorist acts in North-America, thats the only thing you've been right about, right-wingers commit more of them.
But right-wingers dont have same death tolls generally speaking than Islamic terrorists do.
And when I pointed that out to you, you said body count didnt matter when it came to assessing terroristic threat, which again I proved you wrong by with this post:
Last but not least, so far in 2025 Islamic terror has caused many more deaths than right-wingers have.
And thats because of this attack: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_New_Orleans_truck_attack
So your saying that right wingers and Islamic account for virtually all of the terrorism but that Islamic are just better at it ?
I guess thats one way of looking at it.
The numbers are skewed though, because only 1% of Americans are muslim (3.4 million).
While about half of the US voting public is right-wing (77 million).
In Europe muslim population is around 5%, which is why they've had so much Islamic terrorism.
Far more (and more deadly) than right-wing terrorism
Islamic terrorism in Europe - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Last edited:
I can't imagine why the middle east would hate americansI guess thats one way of looking at it.
The numbers are skewed though, because only 1% of Americans are muslim (3.4 million).
While about half of the US voting public is right-wing (77 million).
In Europe muslim population is around 5%, which is why they've had so much Islamic terrorism.
Far more (and more deadly) than right-wing terrorism
Islamic terrorism in Europe - Wikipedia
