I'm confused, isn't DEI respect for human rights? Or should it only apply to folks like Enrique Tarrio...another step closer to martial law.
You're right you are confused. DEI has nothing to do with human rights. It has everything to do with social re-engineering and treating people differently based upon race, gender or sexuality.I'm confused, isn't DEI respect for human rights? Or should it only apply to folks like Enrique Tarrio...another step closer to martial law.
ohI'm confused, isn't DEI respect for human rights? Or should it only apply to folks like Enrique Tarrio...another step closer to martial law.
I am sure The Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council is relieved that you accept their definitionI'll accept that as a fair argument.
I say they should get in line and follow executive orders. Executive orders are not opinions and ideas...they are law.
Not really just for that. I got my 2 kids, my family is done.Ya, as long as you have CASH![]()
JL, Wemby bought a book to the All Star game locker room and started reading. He's attempting to follow in the footsteps of his role model Kareem Abdul Jabbar. When Joker saw this he said, "he brought a book can I bring a horse".oh
have you decided to be serious ?
IVJL, Wemby bought a book to the All Star game locker room and started reading. He's attempting to follow in the footsteps of his role model Kareem Abdul Jabbar. When Joker saw this he said, he brought a book can I bring a horse.
And now here's something you'll really like.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/poRQLbstTMY
you really don't follow sportsIV
DIE is an abomination
Equality of opportunity is an achievable goal
Equality of outcome is an unachievable quagmire of inefficiency and reverse discrimination
BTW : your messages are confusing blithering's that i can't be bothered to read three times
Who the fuck is Wemby ?
Which All Star game ?
Which sport ?
Who is joker ?
LOLyou really don't follow sports
I am accepting you saying they are more than opinion with this as backing you up.I am sure The Chief Information Officers (CIO) Council is relieved that you accept their definition
Of course not, because it is factually wrong.so now that it has been established that EOs are "law" , will you accept
" I say they should get in line and follow executive orders. Executive orders are not opinions and ideas...they are law."
noI am accepting you saying they are more than opinion with this as backing you up.
Both executive orders and proclamations have the force of law
, much like regulations issued by federal agencies, so they are codified under Title 3 of the Code of Federal Regulations, which is the formal collection of all of the rules and regulations issued by the executive branch and other federal agencies.
Executive orders are not legislation; they require no approval from Congress, and Congress cannot simply overturn them. Congress may pass legislation that might make it difficult, or even impossible, to carry out the order, such as removing funding. Only a sitting U.S. President may overturn an existing executive order by issuing another executive order to that effect.
Both executive orders and proclamations have the force of law,Of course not, because it is factually wrong.
I am assuming AP refers to the Associated PressEOs aren't law and the AP is under no obligation to name things according to how Trump wants things named in the US.
They should acknowledge that the US official documents now name it that way, but have no obligation to follow it in their own style guide.
You mean you think only americans can be anti-immigrants?Calling for a ban on Americans from this board is sheer insanity. I'd expect much better from you IV.
Doug Ford/aka Canada's trump, is still backing a $100 million contract with Musk's Starlink to buy $50 million's worth of services.This will infuriate the Freedumb types. If Trudeau can integrate the PRC and the EU into the Canadian economy he'll be considered one of Canada's greatest PMs.
Make America Great Again...with listeria, measles and bird flu - blame DEI.
Kirk I'm touched, I'm just a goofy fuck.
And yet that is what skoob was specifically referring to.I am assuming AP refers to the Associated Press
you are referring to the gulf renaming
that is a minor issue
it is not the principle issueAnd yet that is what skoob was specifically referring to.
not enough political interference by the PRC in Canada for you?This will infuriate the Freedumb types. If Trudeau can integrate the PRC and the EU into the Canadian economy he'll be considered one of Canada's greatest PMs.
China officially defines itself as a "near-Arctic state," actively engaging in Arctic affairs and claiming a stake in the region through its Arctic policy, particularly regarding economic opportunities and shipping routes.
Key points about China's Arctic stance:
- Self-designation:
China formally declared itself a "near-Arctic state" in its 2018 Arctic policy white paper.
- Strategic interest:
China sees the Arctic as a potential source of natural resources and a key maritime route, particularly with the melting ice opening up new shipping lanes.
- Polar Silk Road:
China has proposed a "Polar Silk Road" initiative to further its economic engagement in the Arctic.
- Criticisms:
Some nations and experts question China's claim to "near-Arctic state" status due to its geographical distance from the Arctic region.